Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box #8109, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1872-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0863-y. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
Because of uncertainties about the complexity of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair for varying patient populations, surgeons may be reluctant to perform this procedure. This study aimed to delineate the risk factors that can be identified in the preoperative setting predictive of longer operative times and complexity in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Patient demographics including body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, previous laparoscopic and open surgical procedures, ventral hernia repairs, and hernia characteristics (defect size and location, adhesions, incarceration) were recorded prospectively. Data are given as mean +/- standard deviation. Times (min) required for abdominal access, adhesiolysis, and mesh placement as well as the total operative time were recorded during each case as outcome measures of operative difficulty. Univariate analyses were performed with the t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test as well as multivariate analyses using the stepwise analysis of covariance model to determine demographic and clinical variables influencing operative times.
The study enrolled 180 patients (78 men and 102 women) with a mean age of 54.8 +/- 12.2 years and a mean BMI of 33.3 +/- 13.0 kg/m(2). Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly longer (p < 0.05) adhesiolysis and total operative times for patients with prior ventral hernia repairs, suprapubic hernia, bowel adhesion to the abdominal wall or hernia sac, and larger hernia defect. The total operative time also was increased (p < 0.05) with incarcerated hernia contents. Mesh placement time was increased (p < 0.05) with incarcerated hernia contents, suprapubic hernia location, hernias requiring larger mesh for repair, and decreased postgraduate year of the surgical assistant. The time required to obtain abdominal access was longer (p < 0.05) with a greater BMI and a higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification. The operative times were not increased with a history of peritonitis, diabetes, immunosuppression, cancer, or with higher numbers of previous open or laparoscopic surgeries.
At least 10 preoperatively identifiable patient variables, either alone or in combination, are predictive of prolonged operative times during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and may be used as surrogates to determine the complexity of a minimally invasive approach.
由于腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术对于不同患者人群的复杂性存在不确定性,外科医生可能不愿意进行该手术。本研究旨在确定术前可识别的预测腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术手术时间延长和复杂性的危险因素。
前瞻性记录患者的人口统计学资料,包括体重指数(BMI)、合并症、既往腹腔镜和开放手术、腹壁疝修补术以及疝特征(缺损大小和位置、粘连、嵌顿)。数据以平均值±标准差表示。记录每个病例的腹部入路、粘连松解和网片放置所需的时间以及总手术时间,作为手术难度的结果测量指标。使用 t 检验或 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行单因素分析,以及使用逐步协方差模型的多因素分析来确定影响手术时间的人口统计学和临床变量。
该研究纳入了 180 例患者(78 名男性和 102 名女性),平均年龄为 54.8±12.2 岁,平均 BMI 为 33.3±13.0kg/m2。多因素分析显示,既往有腹壁疝修补术、耻骨上疝、肠粘连至腹壁或疝囊以及较大疝缺损的患者,粘连松解和总手术时间显著延长(p<0.05)。内容物嵌顿的疝患者的总手术时间也增加(p<0.05)。内容物嵌顿的疝、耻骨上疝位置、需要较大网片修补的疝以及手术助理的研究生后年限增加,网片放置时间延长(p<0.05)。BMI 较大和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级较高的患者获得腹部入路所需的时间延长(p<0.05)。腹膜炎、糖尿病、免疫抑制、癌症或既往开放或腹腔镜手术次数增加与手术时间延长无关。
至少有 10 个术前可识别的患者变量,单独或组合使用,可预测腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术的手术时间延长,并可作为替代指标来确定微创方法的复杂性。