• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用遗传算法优化当前和未来的卫生规划——以救护车位置为例。

Using genetic algorithms to optimise current and future health planning--the example of ambulance locations.

机构信息

Department of Geography, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Geogr. 2010 Jan 28;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-9-4.

DOI:10.1186/1476-072X-9-4
PMID:20109172
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2828441/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ambulance response time is a crucial factor in patient survival. The number of emergency cases (EMS cases) requiring an ambulance is increasing due to changes in population demographics. This is decreasing ambulance response times to the emergency scene. This paper predicts EMS cases for 5-year intervals from 2020, to 2050 by correlating current EMS cases with demographic factors at the level of the census area and predicted population changes. It then applies a modified grouping genetic algorithm to compare current and future optimal locations and numbers of ambulances. Sets of potential locations were evaluated in terms of the (current and predicted) EMS case distances to those locations.

RESULTS

Future EMS demands were predicted to increase by 2030 using the model (R2 = 0.71). The optimal locations of ambulances based on future EMS cases were compared with current locations and with optimal locations modelled on current EMS case data. Optimising the location of ambulance stations locations reduced the average response times by 57 seconds. Current and predicted future EMS demand at modelled locations were calculated and compared.

CONCLUSIONS

The reallocation of ambulances to optimal locations improved response times and could contribute to higher survival rates from life-threatening medical events. Modelling EMS case 'demand' over census areas allows the data to be correlated to population characteristics and optimal 'supply' locations to be identified. Comparing current and future optimal scenarios allows more nuanced planning decisions to be made. This is a generic methodology that could be used to provide evidence in support of public health planning and decision making.

摘要

背景

救护车响应时间是患者生存的关键因素。由于人口统计数据的变化,需要救护车的紧急情况(EMS 情况)数量正在增加,这导致救护车对紧急情况现场的响应时间缩短。本文通过将当前的 EMS 案例与普查区的人口统计因素和预测的人口变化相关联,预测 2020 年至 2050 年每 5 年的 EMS 案例。然后,应用改进的分组遗传算法来比较当前和未来最佳的救护车位置和数量。根据这些位置与当前和预测的 EMS 案例之间的距离,对潜在位置集进行评估。

结果

使用该模型预测未来 EMS 需求将在 2030 年增加(R2 = 0.71)。根据未来 EMS 案例对救护车的最佳位置进行了比较,将其与当前位置以及基于当前 EMS 案例数据建模的最佳位置进行了比较。优化救护车站位置可以将平均响应时间缩短 57 秒。计算并比较了模型化位置的当前和预测未来 EMS 需求。

结论

将救护车重新分配到最佳位置可以提高响应时间,并有助于提高危及生命的医疗事件的生存率。通过在普查区对 EMS 案例“需求”进行建模,可以将数据与人口特征相关联,并确定最佳“供应”位置。比较当前和未来的最佳方案可以做出更细致的规划决策。这是一种通用方法,可以为公共卫生规划和决策提供证据支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c93/2828441/3d4528c2f25e/1476-072X-9-4-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c93/2828441/327791acdff0/1476-072X-9-4-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c93/2828441/493182078aec/1476-072X-9-4-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c93/2828441/3d4528c2f25e/1476-072X-9-4-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c93/2828441/327791acdff0/1476-072X-9-4-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c93/2828441/493182078aec/1476-072X-9-4-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c93/2828441/3d4528c2f25e/1476-072X-9-4-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Using genetic algorithms to optimise current and future health planning--the example of ambulance locations.利用遗传算法优化当前和未来的卫生规划——以救护车位置为例。
Int J Health Geogr. 2010 Jan 28;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-9-4.
2
EMS relocation in a rural area using a geographic information system can improve response time to motor vehicle crashes.在农村地区使用地理信息系统进行紧急医疗服务重新部署可以缩短对机动车碰撞事故的响应时间。
J Trauma. 2011 Oct;71(4):1023-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318230f6f0.
3
Optimizing the location of ambulances in Tijuana, Mexico.优化墨西哥蒂华纳市救护车的停放位置。
Comput Biol Med. 2017 Jan 1;80:107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
4
Factors affecting ambulance utilization for asthma attack treatment: understanding where to target interventions.影响哮喘发作治疗救护车使用率的因素:了解干预措施的目标方向
Public Health. 2015 May;129(5):501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
5
The association between ambulance hospital turnaround times and patient acuity, destination hospital, and time of day.救护车医院周转时间与患者病情、目的地医院和一天中的时间之间的关联。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):366-70. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.561412. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
6
The Effect of Ambulance Staffing Models in a Metropolitan, Fire-Based EMS System.大城市基于消防的急救医疗服务系统中救护车人员配备模式的影响
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Apr;32(2):175-179. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16001539. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
7
Performance evaluation of an EMS system using queuing theory and location analysis: A case study.运用排队论和区位分析对医疗救护系统进行性能评估:案例研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;51:32-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
8
Using optimization to provide decision support for strategic emergency medical service planning - Three case studies.运用优化方法为战略紧急医疗服务规划提供决策支持——三个案例研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jan;133:103975. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103975. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Simulation-based decision support framework for dynamic ambulance redeployment in Singapore.新加坡基于模拟的动态救护车重新部署决策支持框架。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Oct;106:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
10
Dynamic ambulance relocation: a scoping review.动态救护车调配:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 14;13(12):e073394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073394.

引用本文的文献

1
Delivery of public health interventions by the ambulance sector: a scoping review.救护车部门提供公共卫生干预措施:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):2082. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16473-2.
2
Optimal Planning of Health Services through Genetic Algorithm and Discrete Event Simulation: A Proposed Model and Its Application to Stroke Rehabilitation Care.基于遗传算法和离散事件模拟的卫生服务优化规划:一种模型提议及其在中风康复护理中的应用
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Oct 22;7(2):23814683221134098. doi: 10.1177/23814683221134098. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
3
Reorganization of an Emergency Medical System in a Mixed Urban-Rural Area.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of drainage networks on cholera outbreaks in Lusaka, Zambia.排水网络对赞比亚卢萨卡霍乱疫情的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99(11):1982-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.151076. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
2
Using hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions to measure access to primary health care: an application of spatial structural equation modeling.利用非住院治疗敏感疾病的住院情况来衡量初级卫生保健的可及性:空间结构方程模型的应用
Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Aug 28;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-8-51.
3
A method for statistically comparing spatial distribution maps.
城乡混合地区急救医疗体系的重组。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12369. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912369.
4
Dynamic reflections of multidimensional health poverty in Pakistan.巴基斯坦多维健康贫困的动态反映。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 5;16(11):e0258947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258947. eCollection 2021.
5
Coverage versus response time objectives in ambulance location.救护车选址中的覆盖范围与响应时间目标
Int J Health Geogr. 2021 Jul 2;20(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12942-021-00285-x.
6
Workplace Employees' Annual Physical Checkup and During Hire on the Job to Increase Health-care Awareness Perception to Prevent Disease Risk: A Work for Policy-Implementable Option Globally.职场员工年度体检及在职期间体检,以提高健康保健意识,预防疾病风险:一项全球范围内可实施的政策工作方案。
Saf Health Work. 2019 Jun;10(2):132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
7
A two-stage spatial allocation model for elderly healthcare facilities in large-scale affordable housing communities: a case study in Nanjing City.面向大型保障性住房社区的养老设施两阶段空间配置模型:以南京市为例。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Dec 12;17(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0898-6.
8
Does the edge effect impact on the measure of spatial accessibility to healthcare providers?边缘效应是否会影响医疗服务提供者空间可达性的衡量?
Int J Health Geogr. 2017 Dec 11;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12942-017-0119-3.
9
Impact of geographic accessibility on utilization of the annual health check-ups by income level in Japan: A multilevel analysis.日本地理可达性对不同收入水平人群年度健康检查利用情况的影响:一项多层次分析。
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0177091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177091. eCollection 2017.
10
The demographic impact on the demand for emergency medical services in the urban and rural regions of Bavaria, 2012-2032.2012 - 2032年巴伐利亚州城乡地区人口结构对紧急医疗服务需求的影响
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2015;23(4):181-188. doi: 10.1007/s10389-015-0675-6. Epub 2015 May 26.
一种用于对空间分布图进行统计比较的方法。
Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Jan 30;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-8-7.
4
Spatial analysis of risk factor of cholera outbreak for 2003-2004 in a peri-urban area of Lusaka, Zambia.赞比亚卢萨卡市周边地区2003 - 2004年霍乱暴发风险因素的空间分析。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Sep;79(3):414-21.
5
Mobile phones, in combination with a computer locator system, improve the response times of emergency medical services in central London.手机与计算机定位系统相结合,可缩短伦敦市中心紧急医疗服务的响应时间。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Mar;90(2):113-6. doi: 10.1308/003588408X242079.
6
Determining geographic areas and populations with timely access to cardiac catheterization facilities for acute myocardial infarction care in Alberta, Canada.确定加拿大艾伯塔省能够及时使用心脏导管插入设施进行急性心肌梗死治疗的地理区域和人群。
Int J Health Geogr. 2007 Oct 16;6:47. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-6-47.
7
Outcome prediction for guidance of initial resuscitation protocol: Shock first or CPR first.用于指导初始复苏方案的结局预测:先抗休克还是先心肺复苏。
Resuscitation. 2007 Jan;72(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.05.018. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
8
Current practices in spatial analysis of cancer data: mapping health statistics to inform policymakers and the public.癌症数据空间分析的当前实践:绘制健康统计数据以告知政策制定者和公众。
Int J Health Geogr. 2006 Nov 8;5:49. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-5-49.
9
Defining rational hospital catchments for non-urban areas based on travel-time.基于出行时间界定非城市地区合理的医院服务区域。
Int J Health Geogr. 2006 Oct 3;5:43. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-5-43.
10
Emergency medical service systems in Japan: past, present, and future.日本的紧急医疗服务体系:过去、现在与未来。
Resuscitation. 2006 Jun;69(3):365-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.04.001.