Suppr超能文献

成人鼻内泪囊吻合术后结局的系统评价。

A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults.

机构信息

Common Cold Center, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010 Jan-Feb;24(1):81-90. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3393.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to systematically review the clinical outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery. Data sources included PubMed for English language literature from January 1966 to December 2008 combined with a manual review of citations within article bibliographies.

METHODS

Citations acquired from the targeted search were filtered independently by two researchers. Relevant articles were reviewed to obtain information including interventions and outcome measures. The surgical techniques were categorized into external DCR (EX-DCR), endonasal laser-assisted DCR (LA-DCR), and nonlaser endoscopic endonasal DCR techniques (EN-DCR). Articles were then assigned level-of-evidence grades as defined by the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine.

RESULTS

A total of 73 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Of these, 68 were graded as level 4, 11 were graded as level 3b, and 1 was graded at level 2b evidence. A total of 4800 patients were pooled, from which 4921 DCRs were performed. All studies reported success during the follow-up period, although the outcome measures used were not consistent in the studies. Success varied between 65 and 100% after EX-DCR compared with EN-DCR, which varied from 84 to 94%. The success rate of LA-DCR varied widely between 47 and 100%. There was low evidence base to support the use of silicone stent to improve surgical success. Most studies did not show significantly improved outcomes with an antimetabolite. The overall intra- and postoperative complication rates were 1.0 and 6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DCR is an effective and safe method for the treatment of nasolacrimal obstruction. Meta-analysis of outcomes was not feasible because of the heterogenous patient groups and outcome measures used. Nonetheless, the literature provides considerable levels 3 and 4 evidence to support DCR surgery in adults. Outcomes after EN-DCR and EX-DCR were comparable. The failure rate for LA-DCR was higher.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在系统回顾泪囊鼻腔吻合术(DCR)的临床疗效。资料来源包括 1966 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月期间在 PubMed 上发表的英文文献,同时对文献中的参考文献进行了手工检索。

方法

从目标检索中获取的引文由两位研究者独立筛选。回顾相关文献以获取干预措施和结果评估的信息。手术技术分为外 DCR(EX-DCR)、经鼻激光辅助 DCR(LA-DCR)和非激光内镜经鼻 DCR 技术(EN-DCR)。然后,根据牛津循证医学中心的标准,将文章分为证据水平等级。

结果

共分析了 73 项符合纳入标准的研究。其中,68 项为 4 级证据,11 项为 3b 级证据,1 项为 2b 级证据。共纳入 4800 例患者,共行 4921 例 DCR。所有研究均报告在随访期间获得成功,尽管研究中使用的结果评估指标并不一致。EX-DCR 后成功率为 65%至 100%,而 EN-DCR 后成功率为 84%至 94%。LA-DCR 的成功率差异很大,为 47%至 100%。有低证据支持使用硅胶支架来提高手术成功率。大多数研究并未显示抗代谢药物显著改善结果。总的术中及术后并发症发生率分别为 1.0%和 6%。

结论

DCR 是治疗鼻泪管阻塞的一种有效且安全的方法。由于患者群体和使用的结果评估指标不同,无法进行荟萃分析。然而,文献提供了大量的 3 级和 4 级证据支持成人 DCR 手术。EN-DCR 和 EX-DCR 的结果相似。LA-DCR 的失败率较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验