• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结合社区参与式研究与随机临床试验:保护罩对抗烟草(PHAT)戒烟研究。

Combining community participatory research with a randomized clinical trial: the Protecting the Hood Against Tobacco (PHAT) smoking cessation study.

机构信息

Department of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0610, USA.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 2010 Jan-Feb;39(1):50-63. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.06.004
PMID:20109986
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This article describes the process and results of a smoking cessation intervention randomized clinical trial (RCT) that was conducted as a community-based participatory research project. This RCT tested whether outcomes are improved by adding social justice and tobacco industry targeting messages to a smoking cessation program conducted among African American adults within a low-income community in San Francisco, California. This study provides lessons for future similar research projects that focus on urban low-income populations.

METHODS

Participants were randomly allocated to receive a smoking-cessation program (control group [CG]) or CG care plus tobacco industry and media (IAM) messages. Primary interventions were behavioral. At intake, participants reporting severe withdrawal or smoking > or = 25 cigarettes daily were offered free nicotine replacement therapy. Baseline data were from an in-person interview. Outcome measures included self-reported smoking status; validation of quitting was by salivary cotinine assays.

RESULTS

Of 87 participants providing baseline data, 31% (27) did not join the RCT. Proportions quitting in the CG and IAM group were 11.5% and 13.6% at 6 months and 5.3% and 15.8% at 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

African Americans in underserved inner-city neighborhoods can be recruited into RCTs with community participatory approaches. Differences between the CG and IAM in proportions who quit were 2.1% and 10.5% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. More than 3 years with adequate funding, high staffing ratios, and intense outreach and follow-up schedules are needed to achieve recruitment and study goals.

摘要

背景

本文描述了一项作为社区参与式研究项目开展的戒烟干预随机临床试验(RCT)的过程和结果。该 RCT 旨在检验在加利福尼亚州旧金山一个低收入社区中针对非裔美国成年人开展的戒烟项目中增加社会公正和烟草业针对性信息能否改善结果。本研究为未来关注城市低收入人群的类似研究项目提供了经验教训。

方法

参与者被随机分配接受戒烟计划(对照组[CG])或 CG 护理加烟草业和媒体(IAM)信息。主要干预措施是行为干预。在入组时,报告严重戒断或每天吸烟≥25 支的参与者可获得免费尼古丁替代疗法。基线数据来自面对面访谈。主要结局指标包括自我报告的吸烟状况;通过唾液可替宁检测来验证戒烟情况。

结果

在提供基线数据的 87 名参与者中,31%(27 名)未参加 RCT。CG 和 IAM 组分别在 6 个月和 12 个月时的戒烟比例为 11.5%和 13.6%,5.3%和 15.8%。

结论

可以通过社区参与式方法招募服务不足的内城贫困非裔美国人参加 RCT。CG 和 IAM 组在 6 个月和 12 个月时的戒烟比例分别相差 2.1%和 10.5%。需要 3 年以上的充足资金、高人员配备比例以及密集的外展和随访计划才能实现招募和研究目标。

相似文献

1
Combining community participatory research with a randomized clinical trial: the Protecting the Hood Against Tobacco (PHAT) smoking cessation study.结合社区参与式研究与随机临床试验:保护罩对抗烟草(PHAT)戒烟研究。
Heart Lung. 2010 Jan-Feb;39(1):50-63. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
2
A bespoke smoking cessation service compared with treatment as usual for people with severe mental ill health: the SCIMITAR+ RCT.针对严重精神健康问题患者的定制化戒烟服务与常规治疗相比:SCIMITAR+RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(50):1-116. doi: 10.3310/hta23500.
3
A pilot randomised trial to assess the methods and procedures for evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Exercise Assisted Reduction then Stop (EARS) among disadvantaged smokers.一项评估运动辅助戒烟(EARS)对弱势吸烟者的临床效果和成本效益的方法和程序的初步随机试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jan;18(4):1-324. doi: 10.3310/hta18040.
4
Babies Living Safe & Smokefree: randomized controlled trial of a multilevel multimodal behavioral intervention to reduce low-income children's tobacco smoke exposure.保障婴儿安全与无烟环境:一项多层次多模式行为干预减少低收入儿童烟草烟雾暴露的随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4145-7.
5
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.
6
A review of the efficacy of smoking-cessation pharmacotherapies in nonwhite populations.非白人人群中戒烟药物疗法的疗效综述。
Clin Ther. 2008 May;30(5):800-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.010.
7
Management and Point-of-Care for Tobacco Dependence (PROMPT): a feasibility mixed methods community-based participatory action research project in Ottawa, Canada.烟草依赖的管理与即时护理(PROMPT):加拿大渥太华一项基于社区参与式行动研究的可行性混合方法项目。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 25;8(1):e018416. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018416.
8
The Ottawa Citizen Engagement and Action Model (OCEAM): A Citizen engagement Strategy Operationalized Through The Participatory Research in Ottawa, Management and Point-of-care of Tobacco (PROMPT) Study: A Community Based Participatory Action Research Project in Inner City Ottawa.渥太华公民参与与行动模式(OCEAM):一种通过渥太华烟草管理与现场护理参与式研究(PROMPT)实施的公民参与策略:渥太华市中心的一项基于社区的参与式行动研究项目。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 May 21;2:20. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0034-y. eCollection 2016.
9
A randomized clinical trial of a financial education intervention with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for low socio-economic status Australian smokers: a study protocol.一项针对澳大利亚社会经济地位较低的吸烟者的财务教育干预与尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)的随机临床试验:研究方案。
Addiction. 2014 Oct;109(10):1602-11. doi: 10.1111/add.12669. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
10
Smoking Cessation Intervention for severe Mental Ill Health Trial (SCIMITAR): a pilot randomised control trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a bespoke smoking cessation service.重度精神疾病戒烟干预试验(SCIMITAR):一项定制戒烟服务的临床有效性和成本效益的试点随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Mar;19(25):1-148, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta19250.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-Based Interventions to Address Disparities in Cardiometabolic Diseases Among Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups.以社区为基础的干预措施,以解决少数族裔和少数民族群体中心血管代谢疾病的差异。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023 Aug;25(8):467-477. doi: 10.1007/s11883-023-01119-w. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Promoting nurse-led behaviour change interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease in disadvantaged communities: A scoping review.促进以护士为主导的行为改变干预措施,以预防弱势社区的心血管疾病:范围综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):2071-2095. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13867. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
3
Personalised multicomponent interventions for tobacco dependence management in low socioeconomic populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
针对低社会经济地位人群烟草依赖管理的个性化多成分干预措施:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 May 27;76(8):716-29. doi: 10.1136/jech-2021-216783.
4
Community-engaged and community-based participatory research to promote American Heart Association Life's Simple 7 among African American adults: A systematic review.社区参与和社区为基础的参与式研究,以促进美国心脏协会的“生命简单 7”在非裔美国成年人中的应用:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 1;15(9):e0238374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238374. eCollection 2020.
5
Automated Mobile Delivery of Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation Among Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Adults: Feasibility Study.自动化移动支付戒烟经济奖励在社会经济地位低下的成年人中应用:可行性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 15;8(4):e15960. doi: 10.2196/15960.
6
Individual-level behavioural smoking cessation interventions tailored for disadvantaged socioeconomic position: a systematic review and meta-regression.针对社会经济地位不利人群的个体化行为戒烟干预措施:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Dec;4(12):e628-e644. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30220-8.
7
Identifying evidence of effectiveness in the co-creation of research: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the international healthcare literature.识别共同创造研究中的有效性证据:国际医疗保健文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Apr 12;43(1):197-208. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz126.
8
Financial incentives to Medicaid smokers for engaging tobacco quit line treatment: maximising return on investment.为 Medicaid 吸烟者提供财务激励以参与戒烟热线治疗:实现投资回报最大化。
Tob Control. 2020 May;29(3):320-325. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054811. Epub 2019 May 30.
9
Paying Low-Income Smokers to Quit? The Cost-Effectiveness of Incentivizing Tobacco Quit Line Engagement for Medicaid Recipients Who Smoke.向低收入吸烟者付费以使其戒烟?为符合条件的 Medicaid 烟民提供激励以使其参与戒烟热线的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2019 Feb;22(2):177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
10
A scoping review and meta-analysis of psychosocial and pharmacological treatments for cannabis and tobacco use among African Americans.一项针对非裔美国人使用大麻和烟草的心理社会和药物治疗的范围综述和荟萃分析。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Dec;31(8):922-943. doi: 10.1037/adb0000326.