Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Physiotherapy. 2010 Mar;96(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
To investigate the hypoalgesic effect of amplitude-modulated frequency during interferential current therapy using an experimentally induced mechanical pain model in normal subjects. This study examined pain pressure sensitivities achieved when the amplitude-modulated frequency parameter was present (100Hz) and absent (0Hz).
Randomised controlled crossover trial with repeated measures.
University research laboratory.
Forty-six healthy volunteers (23 males, 23 females).
Two interferential therapy protocols (with and without amplitude-modulated frequencies) were applied to the lumbar area on two different days.
Pressure pain thresholds over the lumbar area were measured before, during and after application of the interferential therapy protocols.
A three-way analysis of variance with repeated measures failed to show any statistically significant difference between the two protocols in modifying pressure pain threshold values (mean difference 0.017kg/cm(2), 95% confidence interval -0.384 to 0.350, P=0.93). Statistically significant differences were identified (P<0.001) between measurements, indicating a comparable decrease in pain sensitivity in both groups. However, the increase in pressure pain thresholds (0.76kg/cm(2)) failed to reach a level of clinical importance.
The addition of an amplitude-modulated frequency parameter to interferential therapy did not influence mechanical pain sensitivity in healthy subjects. Amplitude-modulated frequency is therefore unlikely to have a physiological hypoalgesic effect.
在正常受试者的机械性疼痛模型中,通过实验性诱导,研究干扰电流治疗中调幅频率的镇痛效果。本研究检测了在存在(100Hz)和不存在(0Hz)调幅频率参数时获得的疼痛压力敏感度。
随机对照交叉试验,重复测量。
大学研究实验室。
46 名健康志愿者(23 名男性,23 名女性)。
两种干扰治疗方案(有和无调幅频率)分别在两天内应用于腰部区域。
在应用干扰治疗方案前后,测量腰部区域的压力疼痛阈值。
三次方差分析(重复测量)未能显示两种方案在改变压力疼痛阈值值方面存在统计学差异(平均差异 0.017kg/cm2,95%置信区间 -0.384 至 0.350,P=0.93)。测量之间存在统计学显著差异(P<0.001),表明两组的疼痛敏感度均有相当程度的下降。然而,压力疼痛阈值的增加(0.76kg/cm2)并未达到临床重要性水平。
在干扰治疗中添加调幅频率参数并未影响健康受试者的机械性疼痛敏感性。因此,调幅频率不太可能具有生理镇痛效果。