• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者的实际和理想死亡地点。意大利癌症死亡情况调查(ISDOC)的结果。

Actual and preferred place of death of cancer patients. Results from the Italian survey of the dying of cancer (ISDOC).

作者信息

Beccaro Monica, Costantini Massimo, Giorgi Rossi Paolo, Miccinesi Guido, Grimaldi Maria, Bruzzi Paolo

机构信息

Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 May;60(5):412-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.043646.

DOI:10.1136/jech.2005.043646
PMID:16614331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2563975/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe actual and preferred place of death of Italian cancer patients and to analyse the preferences met regarding the place of death.

DESIGN

Mortality follow back survey of 2000 cancer deaths, identified with a two stage probability sample representative of the whole country. Information on patients' experience was gathered from the non-professional caregiver with an interview. A section of the interview covered information on the actual and preferred place of death of the patients.

SETTING

30 Italian local health districts randomly selected after stratification in four geographical areas.

PARTICIPANTS

1900 of 2000 (95.0%) caregivers of cancer deaths identified.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of actual and preferred places of death.

RESULTS

Valid interviews were obtained for 66.9% (n = 1271) of the caregivers. Place of death was home for 57.9% of Italian cancer patients, hospital for 34.6%, hospice for 0.7%, nursing home for 6.5%, and ambulance for 0.4%. Wide and significant differences within Italy were seen (home deaths ranged between 94.0% in the south and 28.2% in the north east). Home was the preferred place of death for 93.5% of patients that expressed a preference, with minimal differences within the country (between 89.5% and 99.0%). Overall 67.1% of the sample died in the place where they preferred to die.

CONCLUSIONS

Policymakers should encourage health services to focus on ways of meeting individual preferences on place of death. As home was the preferred place of death for most cancer patients, effective programmes to enable the patients to remain at home should be implemented.

摘要

目的

描述意大利癌症患者实际的和希望的死亡地点,并分析在死亡地点方面其偏好是否得到满足。

设计

对2000例癌症死亡病例进行死亡率回溯调查,采用两阶段概率抽样,该样本具有全国代表性。通过对非专业照料者进行访谈来收集患者的相关经历信息。访谈的一个部分涵盖了患者实际的和希望的死亡地点的信息。

地点

在四个地理区域分层后随机选择30个意大利地方卫生区。

参与者

在确定的2000例癌症死亡病例中,有1900例(95.0%)的照料者参与。

主要观察指标

实际和希望的死亡地点的患病率。

结果

66.9%(n = 1271)的照料者完成了有效访谈。57.9%的意大利癌症患者在家中死亡,34.6%在医院死亡,0.7%在临终关怀机构死亡,6.5%在养老院死亡,0.4%在救护车上死亡。意大利国内存在广泛且显著的差异(家中死亡比例在南部为94.0%,在东北部为28.2%)。对于表达了偏好的患者,93.5%希望在家中死亡,国内差异极小(在89.5%至99.0%之间)。总体而言,67.1%的样本在其希望死亡的地点去世。

结论

政策制定者应鼓励卫生服务机构关注满足患者对死亡地点个人偏好的方式。由于家是大多数癌症患者希望的死亡地点,应实施有效的项目以使患者能够留在家中。

相似文献

1
Actual and preferred place of death of cancer patients. Results from the Italian survey of the dying of cancer (ISDOC).癌症患者的实际和理想死亡地点。意大利癌症死亡情况调查(ISDOC)的结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 May;60(5):412-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.043646.
2
Inequity in the provision of and access to palliative care for cancer patients. Results from the Italian survey of the dying of cancer (ISDOC).癌症患者姑息治疗提供与可及性方面的不平等。意大利癌症临终调查(ISDOC)结果
BMC Public Health. 2007 Apr 27;7:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-66.
3
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响:对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.
4
The last three months of life of Italian cancer patients. Methods, sample characteristics and response rate of the Italian Survey of the Dying of Cancer (ISDOC).意大利癌症患者生命的最后三个月。意大利癌症患者临终情况调查(ISDOC)的方法、样本特征及应答率。
Palliat Med. 2005 Dec;19(8):628-38. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1086oa.
5
When death is imminent: where terminally ill patients with cancer prefer to die and why.当死亡临近时:晚期癌症患者倾向于离世的地点及原因。
Cancer Nurs. 2003 Jun;26(3):245-51. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200306000-00012.
6
A Prospective Cohort Study of Factors Associated With Place of Death Among Patients With Late-Stage Cancer in Southern Africa.一项在南非开展的与晚期癌症患者死亡地点相关因素的前瞻性队列研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):923-932. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
7
Determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death for terminally ill cancer patients.晚期癌症患者死亡意愿地点与实际死亡地点一致性的影响因素。
J Palliat Care. 2003 Winter;19(4):230-7.
8
Variations in the quality and costs of end-of-life care, preferences and palliative outcomes for cancer patients by place of death: the QUALYCARE study.癌症患者临终关怀的质量和费用、偏好以及姑息治疗结局的差异,与死亡地点有关:QUALYCARE 研究。
BMC Cancer. 2010 Aug 2;10:400. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-400.
9
Actual and preferred place of death of home-dwelling patients in four European countries: making sense of quality indicators.四个欧洲国家居家患者的实际死亡地点和首选死亡地点:解读质量指标
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 8;9(4):e93762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093762. eCollection 2014.
10
Place of death and the differences in patient quality of death and dying and caregiver burden.死亡地点与患者死亡质量和临终关怀差异以及照顾者负担。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 1;33(4):357-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.7355. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling End-of-Life Disparities in Chronic Rheumatic Heart Disease: A 22-Year Analysis of the CDC-WONDER Database.揭示慢性风湿性心脏病患者临终差异:对疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)WONDER数据库的22年分析
Cureus. 2024 Dec 5;16(12):e75162. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75162. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Social, health and lifestyle-related determinants of older adults' preferences for place of death in South Tyrol, Italy - a cross-sectional survey study.意大利南蒂罗尔地区老年人对死亡地点偏好的社会、健康和生活方式决定因素——一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):899. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05485-1.
3
Preferred and Actual Places of Death Among Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Single-centre Cohort Study in Japan.晚期癌症患者的首选和实际死亡地点:日本的一项单中心队列研究。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2024 Jul-Sep;30(3):268-274. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_133_2024. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
4
Palliative care patients in the emergency medical service: a retrospective cohort study from Finland.急救医疗服务中的姑息治疗患者:来自芬兰的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 29;24(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10905-4.
5
Cancer patients have a reduced likelihood of dying in hospital with advance care planning in primary health care and a summarizing palliative plan: a prospective controlled non-randomized intervention trial.癌症患者在初级保健中进行预先护理计划和总结性姑息治疗计划的情况下,其在医院死亡的可能性降低:一项前瞻性对照非随机干预试验。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Sep;42(3):471-482. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2346131. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
6
Prospective Study of Preferred Versus Actual Place of Death Among Swedish Palliative Cancer Patients.瑞典癌症终末期患者期望死亡地点与实际死亡地点的前瞻性研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Sep;41(9):969-977. doi: 10.1177/10499091231213640. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
7
Changes in the Place of Death of Patients With Cancer After the Introduction of Insurance-Covered, Home-Based Hospice Care in Korea.韩国推出保险覆盖的居家安宁疗护后癌症患者死亡地点的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341422. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.41422.
8
Is Hospital Hospice Service Associated with Efficient Healthcare Utilization in Deceased Lung Cancer Patients? Hospital Charges at Their End of Life.医院安宁疗护服务是否与肺癌患者死亡时的高效医疗保健利用相关?临终时的医院费用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 20;19(22):15331. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215331.
9
Home Cancer Care Research: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis (1990-2021).家庭癌症护理研究:文献计量学和可视化分析(1990-2021)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 12;19(20):13116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013116.
10
Hospitalisations of patients with cancer in the last stage of life. Reason to improve advance care planning?终末期癌症患者的住院治疗。是否有理由改善临终关怀计划?
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13720. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13720. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The last three months of life of Italian cancer patients. Methods, sample characteristics and response rate of the Italian Survey of the Dying of Cancer (ISDOC).意大利癌症患者生命的最后三个月。意大利癌症患者临终情况调查(ISDOC)的方法、样本特征及应答率。
Palliat Med. 2005 Dec;19(8):628-38. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1086oa.
2
Preferences for place of care and place of death among informal caregivers of the terminally ill.绝症患者非正式照料者对护理地点和死亡地点的偏好。
Palliat Med. 2005 Sep;19(6):492-9. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1050oa.
3
How people die in hospital general wards: a descriptive study.医院普通病房患者的死亡方式:一项描述性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Jul;30(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.01.013.
4
Discrepancy in the preferences of place of death between terminally ill cancer patients and their primary family caregivers in Taiwan.台湾晚期癌症患者与其主要家庭照顾者在死亡地点偏好上的差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(7):1560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.006. Epub 2005 Apr 7.
5
Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences.晚期癌症患者的护理场所:关于患者偏好的定性系统文献综述
J Palliat Med. 2000 Fall;3(3):287-300. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2000.3.287.
6
Dying to be home? Preferred location of death of first-generation black Caribbean and native-born white patients in the United Kingdom.渴望在家中离世?英国第一代加勒比黑人与本土出生白人患者的首选死亡地点
J Palliat Med. 2004 Oct;7(5):628-36. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2004.7.628.
7
Evolution of truth-telling attitudes and practices in Italy.意大利如实告知态度与做法的演变。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004 Dec;52(3):165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.09.002.
8
Place of death: preferences among cancer patients and their carers.死亡地点:癌症患者及其照料者的偏好
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(12):2431-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.005.
9
Determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death for terminally ill cancer patients.晚期癌症患者死亡意愿地点与实际死亡地点一致性的影响因素。
J Palliat Care. 2003 Winter;19(4):230-7.
10
Measuring and improving the quality of dying and death.衡量并改善临终与死亡的质量。
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 2;139(5 Pt 2):410-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_part_2-200309021-00006.