• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

游离主动脉瓣环置换术与同种异体主动脉瓣环置换术的远期结果:前瞻性随机试验结果。

Late outcomes following freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Harefield and Royal Brompton NHS Trust, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jan 26;55(4):368-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.030.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.030
PMID:20117443
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to compare long-term results after homograft versus Freestyle (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) aortic root replacement.

BACKGROUND

The ideal substitute for aortic root replacement remains undetermined.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2005, 166 patients (age 65 +/- 8 years) undergoing total aortic root replacement were randomized to receive a homograft (n = 76) or a Freestyle bioprosthesis (n = 90). Six patients randomly assigned to homograft crossed over to Freestyle because of unavailability of suitably sized homografts. Median follow-up was 7.6 years (maximum 11 years; 1,035 patient-years). "Evolving" aortic valve dysfunction was defined as aortic regurgitation >/=2/4 and/or peak gradient >20 mm Hg.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. Concomitant procedures were performed in 44% and 47% of Freestyle and homograft patients, respectively (p = 0.5). Overall hospital mortality was 4.8% (1% for isolated root replacement). Eight-year survival was 80 +/- 5% in the Freestyle group versus 77 +/- 6% in the homograft group (p = 0.9). Freedom from need for reoperation at 8 years was significantly higher after Freestyle root replacement (100 +/- 0% vs. 90 +/- 5% after homograft replacement; p = 0.02). All reoperations were secondary to structural valve deterioration (n = 6). At last echocardiographic follow-up, actuarial freedom from evolving aortic valve dysfunction was 86 +/- 5% for Freestyle bioprostheses versus 37 +/- 7% for homografts (p < 0.001). Clinically, freedom from New York Heart Association functional class III to IV and freedom from valve-related complications were similar between groups (p = 0.7 and p = 0.9, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this patient group, late survival is similar after homograft versus Freestyle root replacement. However, Freestyle aortic root replacement is associated with significantly less progressive aortic valve dysfunction and a lower need for reoperations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较同种异体移植物与 Freestyle(美敦力公司,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市)主动脉根部置换的长期结果。

背景

主动脉根部置换的理想替代物仍未确定。

方法

1997 年至 2005 年间,166 例(年龄 65±8 岁)接受全主动脉根部置换的患者被随机分为同种异体移植物组(n=76)或 Freestyle 生物瓣组(n=90)。由于同种异体移植物尺寸不合适,随机分配至同种异体移植物组的 6 例患者交叉至 Freestyle 组。中位随访时间为 7.6 年(最长 11 年;1035 患者-年)。“进展性”主动脉瓣功能障碍定义为主动脉瓣反流≥2/4 级和/或峰值梯度>20mmHg。

结果

两组患者的特征无差异。Freestyle 和同种异体移植物组分别有 44%和 47%的患者同时行其他手术(p=0.5)。总住院死亡率为 4.8%(单纯根部置换为 1%)。Freestyle 组 8 年生存率为 80±5%,同种异体移植物组为 77±6%(p=0.9)。Freestyle 根部置换 8 年无再次手术率明显高于同种异体移植物置换(100±0%vs.90±5%;p=0.02)。所有再次手术均继发于结构性瓣膜退化(n=6)。最后一次超声心动图随访时,Freestyle 生物瓣的无进展性主动脉瓣功能障碍的实际无事件生存率为 86±5%,同种异体移植物为 37±7%(p<0.001)。临床方面,两组纽约心脏协会心功能 III 级至 IV 级的无事件生存率和瓣膜相关并发症的无事件生存率无差异(p=0.7 和 p=0.9)。

结论

在该患者群体中,同种异体移植物与 Freestyle 根部置换的晚期生存率相似。然而,Freestyle 主动脉根部置换与进展性主动脉瓣功能障碍发生率较低和再手术需求较低相关。

相似文献

1
Late outcomes following freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial.游离主动脉瓣环置换术与同种异体主动脉瓣环置换术的远期结果:前瞻性随机试验结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jan 26;55(4):368-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.030.
2
Mid-term pattern of survival, hemodynamic performance and rate of complications after medtronic freestyle versus homograft full aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial.美敦力自由式人工血管与同种异体主动脉根部置换术后的中期生存模式、血流动力学表现及并发症发生率:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果
J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 Nov;13(6):972-5; discussion 975-6.
3
Rate of progression and functional significance of aortic root calcification after homograft versus freestyle aortic root replacement.同种异体主动脉根置换与自由式主动脉根置换术后主动脉根钙化的进展率及功能意义
Circulation. 2009 Sep 15;120(11 Suppl):S269-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843748.
4
The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.同种异体主动脉瓣:1022例瓣膜置换术长达29年、随访率99.3%的随访结果
J Heart Valve Dis. 2001 May;10(3):334-44; discussion 335.
5
A quantitative study of calcium deposition in the aortic wall following Medtronic Freestyle compared with homograft aortic root replacement. A prospective randomized trial.一项关于美敦力自由式瓣膜植入术后与同种异体主动脉根部置换术后主动脉壁钙沉积的定量研究。一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2000 Jan;9(1):97-103.
6
Transvalvular velocities after full aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial between the homograft and the Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis.全主动脉根部置换术后的跨瓣流速:同种异体移植物与美敦力Freestyle生物瓣膜假体前瞻性随机试验的结果
J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Jan;11(1):54-8; discussion 58-9.
7
Aortic homograft: a suitable substitute for aortic valve replacement.主动脉同种异体移植:主动脉瓣置换的合适替代物。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Sep;80(3):832-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.056.
8
Ten-year outcome after aortic valve replacement with the freestyle stentless bioprosthesis.使用 Freestyle 无支架生物瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换术后的十年随访结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Aug;80(2):480-6; discussion 486-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.027.
9
Pulmonary autograft versus aortic homograft for aortic valve replacement: interim results from a prospective randomized trial.肺动脉自体移植与主动脉同种异体移植用于主动脉瓣置换:一项前瞻性随机试验的中期结果。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2000 Mar;9(2):176-88; discussion 188-9.
10
Aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis: 5-year results.使用美敦力Freestyle生物瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换术:5年结果
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Oct;11(4 Suppl 1):35-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Full-root aortic valve replacement using Medtronic Freestyle bioroots for infective endocarditis.使用美敦力Freestyle生物瓣根进行全根主动脉瓣置换术治疗感染性心内膜炎。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Mar 5;40(3). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf034.
2
State-of-the-Art Review of Aortic Root Reconstruction: Contemporary Techniques and Challenges.主动脉根部重建的最新综述:当代技术与挑战
Innovations (Phila). 2024 Nov-Dec;19(6):600-610. doi: 10.1177/15569845241299804. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
3
Biological Surgical Options in Young Patients for the Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis: Is the Jury Still Out? A Review.
年轻患者严重主动脉瓣狭窄治疗中的生物外科手术选择:尚无定论?综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 26;23(8):274. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2308274. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Surgical Challenges in Infective Endocarditis: State of the Art.感染性心内膜炎的外科挑战:最新进展
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 11;12(18):5891. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185891.
5
The Use of the Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft for Aortic Valve Replacement: Is It Still an Option?冷冻保存的主动脉同种异体移植物用于主动脉瓣置换:它仍然是一种选择吗?
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Jun 8;10(6):248. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10060248.
6
Impact of aortic root repair or replacement in severe destructive aortic valve endocarditis with paravalvular abscesses on long-term survival.主动脉根部修复或置换术对伴有瓣周脓肿的重度破坏性主动脉瓣心内膜炎患者长期生存的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb 21;34(3):361-368. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab330.
7
Commentary: One rose does not make a bouquet.评论:一枝独秀不是春。
JTCVS Tech. 2020 Dec 8;5:4-5. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.11.033. eCollection 2021 Feb.
8
Treatment of aortic valve endocarditis with stented or stentless valve.带支架或无支架瓣膜治疗主动脉瓣心内膜炎。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;164(2):480-487.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.068. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
9
A biological approach to aortic valve disease: durability and survival.主动脉瓣疾病的生物学研究方法:耐用性与生存率
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 Dec;17(12):754-756. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-00446-8.
10
Degeneration of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Update 2020.生物瓣心脏瓣膜的退行性变:2020 年更新。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(19):e018506. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018506. Epub 2020 Sep 21.