• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

书面评估不是高级心血管生命支持课程技能表现的预测指标。

Written evaluation is not a predictor for skills performance in an Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support course.

机构信息

Center for Simulation, Advanced Education, and Innovation, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2010 Apr;81(4):453-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.018. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.018
PMID:20117875
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Both a written cognitive knowledge evaluation and a practical evaluation that tests psychomotor skills, cognitive knowledge, and affective behaviors such as leadership and team skills are required for successful completion of American Heart Association (AHA) Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) course. The 2005 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendations noted that in Basic Life Support (BLS) there is little to no correlation between written and practical skills. The current study was conducted to determine if there is a correlation between written and practical evaluations in an ACLS course.

METHODS

34 senior nursing students from four nursing programs participated in two separate ACLS classes, completing both the written and practical evaluations. Immediately following the courses, all participants served as team leader for a video recorded simulated cardiac arrest event. A panel of expert ACLS instructors who did not participate as instructors in the courses reviewed each video and independently scored team leaders' performances.

RESULTS

Spearman's rho correlation coefficient between the written test scores and practical skills performance was 0.194 (2-tailed significance=0.272).

CONCLUSION

The ACLS written evaluation was not a predictor of participant skills in managing a simulated cardiac arrest event immediately following an ACLS course. The single case simulations used in ACLS skills evaluation test a narrow portion of ACLS content while written evaluation tests can more practically test a broader spectrum of content. Both work in concert to define participant knowledge and neither should be used exclusively to determine participant competence.

摘要

目的

成功完成美国心脏协会(AHA)高级心血管生命支持(ACLS)课程需要书面认知知识评估和实际评估,实际评估测试心理运动技能、认知知识和领导能力以及团队合作等情感行为。2005 年国际复苏联合会(ILCOR)科学和治疗建议共识指出,在基础生命支持(BLS)中,书面技能和实际技能之间几乎没有相关性。本研究旨在确定 ACLS 课程中的书面评估和实际评估之间是否存在相关性。

方法

来自四个护理项目的 34 名高级护理学生参加了两个单独的 ACLS 课程,完成了书面和实际评估。课程结束后,所有参与者都担任了一个记录在案的模拟心脏骤停事件的团队负责人。一组没有参与课程教学的专家 ACLS 讲师审查了每个视频,并独立对团队负责人的表现进行评分。

结果

书面测试成绩与实际技能表现之间的斯皮尔曼 rho 相关系数为 0.194(双侧显著性=0.272)。

结论

ACLS 书面评估不能预测参与者在完成 ACLS 课程后立即处理模拟心脏骤停事件的技能。ACLS 技能评估中使用的单个案例模拟仅测试 ACLS 内容的一小部分,而书面评估可以更实际地测试更广泛的内容。两者共同作用以定义参与者的知识,两者都不应单独用于确定参与者的能力。

相似文献

1
Written evaluation is not a predictor for skills performance in an Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support course.书面评估不是高级心血管生命支持课程技能表现的预测指标。
Resuscitation. 2010 Apr;81(4):453-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.018. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
2
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.国际复苏联合委员会(ILCOR)关于儿科和新生儿患者的科学共识及治疗建议:儿科基础与高级生命支持
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):e955-77. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0206. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
3
2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic life support.2005年美国心脏协会(AHA)关于儿科和新生儿患者心肺复苏(CPR)及紧急心血管护理(ECC)的指南:儿科基础生命支持
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):e989-1004. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0219.
4
Paediatric life support instructors courses in Spain. Spanish Paediatric and Neonatal Resuscitation Group.西班牙的儿科生命支持教员课程。西班牙儿科与新生儿复苏小组。
Resuscitation. 1999 Jul;41(2):205-9.
5
Learning advanced cardiac life support: a comparison study of the effects of low- and high-fidelity simulation.学习高级心脏生命支持:低仿真度与高仿真度模拟效果的比较研究
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 Mar-Apr;30(2):91-5.
6
High-fidelity simulation enhances ACLS training.高保真模拟增强了高级心血管生命支持培训。
Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(3):266-73. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.910466.
7
[The teaching of basic pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the degree course in medicine and surgery].[医学与外科学学位课程中的小儿基本心肺复苏教学]
An Esp Pediatr. 1999 Jun;50(6):571-5.
8
Comparison of traditional advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) course instruction vs. a scenario-based, performance oriented team instruction (SPOTI) method for Korean paramedic students.韩国护理专业学生的传统高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)课程教学与基于情景、以表现为导向的团队教学(SPOTI)方法的比较。
J Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.11.078. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
9
Cardiologists' knowledge of the 2005 American Heart Association Resuscitation Guidelines: The Athens Study.心脏病专家对 2005 年美国心脏协会复苏指南的了解:雅典研究。
Heart Lung. 2011 Jul-Aug;40(4):278-84. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2011.01.009.
10
Hospital employees improve basic life support skills and confidence with a personal resuscitation manikin and a 24-min video instruction.医院员工通过使用个人复苏模拟人及24分钟的视频指导来提高基本生命支持技能和信心。
Resuscitation. 2009 Aug;80(8):898-902. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Education Research: High-Fidelity Simulation to Evaluate Diagnostic Reasoning Reveals Failure to Detect Viral Encephalitis in Medical Trainees.教育研究:运用高保真模拟评估诊断推理发现医学实习生未能检测出病毒性脑炎
Neurol Educ. 2022 Nov 17;1(2):e200020. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200020. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Monitoring and evaluation in disaster management courses: a scoping review.灾害管理课程中的监测与评估:一项范围综述
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 6;25(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06659-0.
3
Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness.
为医疗急救人员应对危机做准备:灾难培训计划及其效果的系统文献回顾。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 24;30(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01056-8.
4
Predicting electrocardiogram interpretation performance in Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support simulation: comparing knowledge tests and simulation performance among Mexican medical students.预测高级心血管生命支持模拟中的心电图解读表现:比较墨西哥医学生的知识测试与模拟表现
PeerJ. 2019 Mar 15;7:e6632. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6632. eCollection 2019.
5
Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs. Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.模拟教学与标准培训在医学本科生高质量心肺复苏教学中效果的随机对照试验
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;20(1):15-22. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.11.39040. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
6
Crisis Team Management in a Scarce Resource Setting: Angkor Hospital for Children in Siem Reap, Cambodia.资源稀缺环境下的危机团队管理:柬埔寨暹粒省吴哥儿童医院
Front Public Health. 2017 Jul 5;5:154. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00154. eCollection 2017.
7
Flipping the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Classroom with Team-based Learning: Comparison of Cognitive Testing Performance for Medical Students at the University of California, Irvine, United States.通过基于团队的学习翻转高级心脏生命支持课堂:美国加利福尼亚大学欧文分校医学生认知测试表现的比较
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 Feb 18;13:11. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.11. eCollection 2016.
8
Correlation of Simulation Examination to Written Test Scores for Advanced Cardiac Life Support Testing: Prospective Cohort Study.高级心脏生命支持测试中模拟考试与笔试成绩的相关性:前瞻性队列研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;16(6):907-12. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.10.26974. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
9
PHTLS ® (Prehospital Trauma Life Support) provider courses in Germany - who takes part and what do participants think about prehospital trauma care training?德国的PHTLS®(院前创伤生命支持)提供者课程——哪些人参加以及参与者对院前创伤护理培训有何看法?
J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2014 Jul 7;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-8-7. eCollection 2014.
10
The European Paediatric Life Support course improves assessment and care of dehydrated children in the emergency department.欧洲儿科生命支持课程提高了急诊科脱水儿童的评估和护理水平。
Eur J Pediatr. 2011 Sep;170(9):1151-7. doi: 10.1007/s00431-011-1428-3. Epub 2011 Feb 22.