12th Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sotiria General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Heart Lung. 2011 Jul-Aug;40(4):278-84. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2011.01.009.
The study objective was to determine cardiologists' theoretic knowledge of the 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) resuscitation guidelines.
The questionnaire consisted of demographic questions, resuscitation experience questions, a question regarding confidence in resuscitation skills, and 20 theoretic knowledge questions.
For the theoretic knowledge questions, the participants' overall mean score was 9.9 ± 4.6 (range 3-20). Participants who had received advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training scored significantly higher. Furthermore, those who had attended the ACLS course in the preceding year scored significantly higher compared with those who had attended the ACLS course more than 1 year before the survey (19.1 ± .6 vs 16.7 ± .67, P = .001). Theoretic knowledge of resuscitation did not increase with seniority. Furthermore, no correlation was observed between the theoretic knowledge scores and participants' self-appraisal of resuscitation knowledge.
Cardiologists have knowledge gaps in the 2005 AHA resuscitation guidelines. Resuscitation knowledge decay 1 year after the course is evident.
本研究旨在确定心脏病专家对 2005 年美国心脏协会(AHA)复苏指南的理论知识掌握程度。
问卷包括人口统计学问题、复苏经验问题、对复苏技能信心的问题以及 20 个理论知识问题。
对于理论知识问题,参与者的总体平均得分为 9.9±4.6(范围 3-20)。接受过高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)培训的参与者得分显著更高。此外,与参加 ACLS 课程超过 1 年前的参与者相比,参加 ACLS 课程的参与者在过去一年中参加 ACLS 课程的得分显著更高(19.1±0.6 与 16.7±0.67,P=0.001)。复苏理论知识与资历无关。此外,理论知识得分与参与者对复苏知识的自我评估之间没有相关性。
心脏病专家对 2005 年 AHA 复苏指南存在知识差距。在课程结束 1 年后,复苏知识明显衰减。