Schnellinger Mark G, Reid Samuel, Louie Jeffrey
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55404, USA.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2010 Jun;49(6):569-73. doi: 10.1177/0009922809352375. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
In most instances, infants and children with moderate to severe head trauma undergo a head computed tomography (CT) scan as part of their initial evaluation. Several authors have advocated a routine second head CT after traumatic brain injury (TBI) to identify progressive lesions that may require surgical intervention. However, recent studies have challenged the need for a routine second brain imaging study after TBI. In addition, recent reports have raised concerns about the potential for malignancy following CT scanning, especially in pediatric patients. The authors performed a retrospective case series of all patients, aged 0 to 21 years, who presented to their 2 emergency departments (EDs) and received an International Classification of Disease-9th revision code related to intracranial injury. Out of 47 children, 5 (11%) underwent neurosurgical intervention following their second imaging study, and 1 of these interventions was unplanned after the first study. Compared with children who did not require an intervention following their second scan, children who received an intervention were more likely to have been subjected to nonaccidental trauma and to have presented to the ED more than 4 hours after the injury. Most children with intracranial injury following blunt trauma who did not require immediate neurosurgical intervention but instead underwent a follow-up brain imaging study did not require subsequent unplanned neurosurgical intervention. Serial brain imaging may not be required for all children with intracranial injury.
在大多数情况下,中重度头部外伤的婴幼儿和儿童在初始评估时会接受头部计算机断层扫描(CT)。几位作者主张在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后进行常规的第二次头部CT检查,以识别可能需要手术干预的进展性病变。然而,最近的研究对TBI后常规进行第二次脑部影像学检查的必要性提出了质疑。此外,最近的报告引发了对CT扫描后尤其是儿科患者发生恶性肿瘤可能性的担忧。作者对所有年龄在0至21岁、前往其两家急诊科就诊并收到与颅内损伤相关的国际疾病分类第九版编码的患者进行了一项回顾性病例系列研究。在47名儿童中,5名(11%)在第二次影像学检查后接受了神经外科干预,其中1次干预在第一次检查后属于非计划性干预。与第二次扫描后不需要干预的儿童相比,接受干预的儿童更有可能遭受非意外创伤,且受伤后到急诊科就诊的时间超过4小时。大多数钝性创伤后颅内损伤但不需要立即进行神经外科干预而是接受了脑部随访影像学检查的儿童,不需要随后进行非计划性神经外科干预。并非所有颅内损伤儿童都需要进行系列脑部影像学检查。