Suppr超能文献

读者经验对计算机断层冠状动脉造影中冠状动脉斑块检测的可变性、评估时间和准确性的影响。

Effect of reader experience on variability, evaluation time and accuracy of coronary plaque detection with computed tomography coronary angiography.

机构信息

Computer Vision Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2010 Jul;20(7):1599-606. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1709-7. Epub 2010 Jan 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of reader experience on variability, evaluation time and accuracy in the detection of coronary artery plaques with computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA).

METHODS

Three independent, blinded readers with three different experience levels twice labelled 50 retrospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-gated contrast-enhanced dual-source CTCA data sets (15 female, age 67.3 +/- 10.4 years, range 46-86 years) indicating the presence or absence of coronary plaques. The evaluation times for the readings were recorded. Intra- and interobserver variability expressed as kappa statistics and sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated for plaque detection, with a consensus reading of the three readers taken as the standard of reference. A bootstrap method was applied in the statistical analysis to account for clustering.

RESULTS

Significant correlations were found between reader experience and, respectively, evaluation times (r = -0.59, p < 0.05) and intraobserver variability (r = 0.73, p < 0.05). The evaluation time significantly differed among the readers (p < 0.05). The observer variability for plaque detection, compared with the consensus, varied between kappa = 0.582 and kappa = 0.802. Variability of plaque detection was significantly smaller (p < 0.05) and more accurate (p < 0.05) for the most experienced reader.

CONCLUSION

Reader experience significantly correlated with observer variability, evaluation time and accuracy of coronary plaque detection at CTCA.

摘要

目的

评估在 CTCA 检测冠状动脉斑块时,读者经验对检测的变异性、评估时间和准确性的影响。

方法

三位独立的、盲目的经验水平不同的读者两次对 50 个回顾性心电图(ECG)门控双源 CTCA 数据集进行标注,以指示是否存在冠状动脉斑块。记录了阅读的评估时间。计算了斑块检测的观察者内和观察者间变异性的kappa 统计量以及敏感性、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值,以三位读者的共识阅读作为参考标准。统计分析采用了自举法来考虑聚类。

结果

读者经验与评估时间(r = -0.59,p < 0.05)和观察者内变异性(r = 0.73,p < 0.05)分别呈显著相关。读者之间的评估时间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。与共识相比,斑块检测的观察者变异性在 kappa = 0.582 到 kappa = 0.802 之间变化。与经验最丰富的读者相比,斑块检测的变异性显著较小(p < 0.05)且更准确(p < 0.05)。

结论

在 CTCA 检测冠状动脉斑块时,读者经验与观察者变异性、评估时间和准确性显著相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验