Suppr超能文献

主观困倦是否能预测客观的睡眠倾向?

Does subjective sleepiness predict objective sleep propensity?

机构信息

School of Psychology, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Sleep. 2010 Jan;33(1):123-9. doi: 10.1093/sleep/33.1.123.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Research has shown variability in the correlations observed between subjective sleepiness and objective polysomnographic sleep latency. The present study evaluated whether eliciting subjective judgments of sleepiness after a 1-minute period of quiet with eyes closed would strengthen the relationship between subjective and objective measures.

DESIGN

Subjective judgments of sleepiness were collected following three 1-minute conditions (eyes-closed, eyes-open fixed gaze, and visual reaction time task) using the Stanford Sleepiness Scale and a visual analogue scale, prior to a measure of polysomnographic sleep latency. For each participant, subjective and objective measures were obtained a total of 12 times half-hourly from 20:00 to 01:30.

SETTING

Sleep laboratory of the Flinders University.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 12 young adult good sleepers.

RESULTS

Within-subjects correlations between subjective and objective sleepiness across an evening period of increasing sleepiness were generally high (means approximately -0.63) and significant (P < 0.05). Contrary to expectation, there were no differences in correlations among the 3 conditions. Unexpectedly, when the correlations were calculated across subjects, correlations were noticeably weaker (means around -0.42), whereas the correlation means calculated across subjects, controlling for clock time, were close to 0.

CONCLUSIONS

In controlled laboratory conditions, high correlations between subjective and objective measures of sleepiness within subjects were found across a large range of sleepiness (20:00 to 01:30) for all conditions. Calculating correlations within subjects and across a range of the circadian variation in sleepiness contributed substantially to the strength of the relationship found. These results suggest that the variability of prior research findings may be due, at least partly, to the way in which correlations were derived.

摘要

研究对象

研究表明,主观嗜睡与客观多导睡眠潜伏期之间观察到的相关性存在差异。本研究评估了在闭眼安静 1 分钟后诱发主观嗜睡判断是否会增强主观和客观测量之间的关系。

设计

使用斯坦福嗜睡量表和视觉模拟量表,在多导睡眠潜伏期测量之前,共收集了三种 1 分钟状态(闭眼、睁眼固定注视和视觉反应时间任务)下的主观嗜睡判断。对于每个参与者,从 20:00 到 01:30,每隔半小时总共获得 12 次主观和客观测量。

地点

弗林德斯大学睡眠实验室。

参与者

12 名年轻健康的睡眠者。

结果

在一个晚上逐渐增加嗜睡的时间段内,主观和客观嗜睡之间的个体内相关性通常很高(平均值约为-0.63)且显著(P<0.05)。与预期相反,在三种条件之间没有相关性差异。出乎意料的是,当跨受试者计算相关性时,相关性明显较弱(平均值约为-0.42),而当跨受试者计算相关性并控制时钟时间时,相关性接近 0。

结论

在受控的实验室条件下,在所有条件下,从 20:00 到 01:30,在较大的嗜睡范围内,个体内主观和客观嗜睡测量之间的相关性很高。在个体内和一系列睡眠中昼夜变化范围内计算相关性,大大增强了发现的关系的强度。这些结果表明,先前研究结果的可变性可能部分归因于相关性的推导方式。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Comment on short-term variation in subjective sleepiness.关于主观嗜睡的短期变化的评论。
Percept Mot Skills. 2005 Dec;101(3):943-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.101.3.943-948.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验