Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds.
Obes Rev. 2010 Mar;11(3):251-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00714.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
This report describes a set of scientific procedures used to assess the impact of foods and food ingredients on the expression of appetite (psychological and behavioural). An overarching priority has been to enable potential evaluators of health claims about foods to identify justified claims and to exclude claims that are not supported by scientific evidence for the effect cited. This priority follows precisely from the principles set down in the PASSCLAIM report. The report allows the evaluation of the strength of health claims, about the effects of foods on appetite, which can be sustained on the basis of the commonly used scientific designs and experimental procedures. The report includes different designs for assessing effects on satiation as opposed to satiety, detailed coverage of the extent to which a change in hunger can stand alone as a measure of appetite control and an extensive discussion of the statistical procedures appropriate for handling data in this field of research. Because research in this area is continually evolving, new improved methodologies may emerge over time and will need to be incorporated into the framework. One main objective of the report has been to produce guidance on good practice in carrying out appetite research, and not to set down a series of commandments that must be followed.
本报告描述了一组用于评估食物和食品成分对食欲(心理和行为)表达影响的科学程序。首要任务是使潜在的食品健康声称评估者能够识别合理的声称,并排除没有所引用效果的科学证据支持的声称。这一优先事项正是遵循了 PASSCLAIM 报告中规定的原则。该报告允许评估关于食物对食欲影响的健康声称的强度,这些声称可以基于常用的科学设计和实验程序来维持。该报告包括评估饱腹感与饱腹感的不同设计,详细涵盖了饥饿感的变化是否可以作为食欲控制的衡量标准,以及对该研究领域数据处理的适当统计程序的广泛讨论。由于该领域的研究不断发展,新的改进方法可能会随着时间的推移而出现,并需要纳入框架中。该报告的一个主要目标是就进行食欲研究的良好实践提供指导,而不是制定一系列必须遵循的戒律。