• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大肠杆菌和酵母中蛋白质复合物的比较进化分析。

Comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in E. coli and yeast.

机构信息

Research Department of Structural & Molecular Biology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Genomics. 2010 Feb 1;11:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-79.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2164-11-79
PMID:20122144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2837643/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proteins do not act in isolation; they frequently act together in protein complexes to carry out concerted cellular functions. The evolution of complexes is poorly understood, especially in organisms other than yeast, where little experimental data has been available.

RESULTS

We generated accurate, high coverage datasets of protein complexes for E. coli and yeast in order to study differences in the evolution of complexes between these two species. We show that substantial differences exist in how complexes have evolved between these organisms. A previously proposed model of complex evolution identified complexes with cores of interacting homologues. We support findings of the relative importance of this mode of evolution in yeast, but find that it is much less common in E. coli. Additionally it is shown that those homologues which do cluster in complexes are involved in eukaryote-specific functions. Furthermore we identify correlated pairs of non-homologous domains which occur in multiple protein complexes. These were identified in both yeast and E. coli and we present evidence that these too may represent complex cores in yeast but not those of E. coli.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that there are differences in the way protein complexes have evolved in E. coli and yeast. Whereas some yeast complexes have evolved by recruiting paralogues, this is not apparent in E. coli. Furthermore, such complexes are involved in eukaryotic-specific functions. This implies that the increase in gene family sizes seen in eukaryotes in part reflects multiple family members being used within complexes. However, in general, in both E. coli and yeast, homologous domains are used in different complexes.

摘要

背景

蛋白质并非孤立地发挥作用;它们经常在蛋白质复合物中共同作用,以执行协同的细胞功能。复合物的进化还不太清楚,尤其是在除酵母以外的生物体中,那里几乎没有实验数据。

结果

为了研究这两个物种之间复合物进化的差异,我们为大肠杆菌和酵母生成了准确、高覆盖率的蛋白质复合物数据集。我们表明,这两个生物体之间的复合物进化存在显著差异。之前提出的复合物进化模型确定了具有相互作用同源物核心的复合物。我们支持该模型在酵母中的相对重要性的发现,但发现它在大肠杆菌中要少见得多。此外,还表明那些在复合物中聚类的同源物参与了真核生物特有的功能。此外,我们还鉴定了在多个蛋白质复合物中出现的相关非同源结构域对。这些在酵母和大肠杆菌中都有发现,我们提供的证据表明,这些在酵母中也可能代表复合物的核心,但在大肠杆菌中则不然。

结论

我们的结果表明,大肠杆菌和酵母中蛋白质复合物的进化方式存在差异。虽然一些酵母复合物是通过招募旁系同源物进化而来的,但在大肠杆菌中则不明显。此外,这样的复合物涉及真核生物特有的功能。这意味着真核生物中基因家族大小的增加部分反映了多个家族成员在复合物中被使用。然而,一般来说,在大肠杆菌和酵母中,同源结构域用于不同的复合物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/e4bf1b90393e/1471-2164-11-79-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/35b47d93e731/1471-2164-11-79-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/556675ba2acb/1471-2164-11-79-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/b5fe8509451a/1471-2164-11-79-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/c59d4e5aea14/1471-2164-11-79-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/d67b8b99393c/1471-2164-11-79-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/e4bf1b90393e/1471-2164-11-79-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/35b47d93e731/1471-2164-11-79-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/556675ba2acb/1471-2164-11-79-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/b5fe8509451a/1471-2164-11-79-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/c59d4e5aea14/1471-2164-11-79-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/d67b8b99393c/1471-2164-11-79-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/2837643/e4bf1b90393e/1471-2164-11-79-6.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in E. coli and yeast.大肠杆菌和酵母中蛋白质复合物的比较进化分析。
BMC Genomics. 2010 Feb 1;11:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-79.
2
Evolutionary rate heterogeneity of core and attachment proteins in yeast protein complexes.酵母蛋白复合物核心和附属蛋白的进化速率异质性。
Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5(7):1366-75. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt096.
3
Detection of overlapping protein complexes in gene expression, phenotype and pathways of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using Prorank based Fuzzy algorithm.使用基于Prorank的模糊算法检测酿酒酵母基因表达、表型和通路中的重叠蛋白质复合物。
Gene. 2016 Apr 15;580(2):144-158. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
4
Predicting protein complexes from weighted protein-protein interaction graphs with a novel unsupervised methodology: Evolutionary enhanced Markov clustering.利用一种新颖的无监督方法从加权蛋白质 - 蛋白质相互作用图预测蛋白质复合物:进化增强的马尔可夫聚类。
Artif Intell Med. 2015 Mar;63(3):181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2014.12.012. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
5
Identification of Essential Proteins Based on a New Combination of Local Interaction Density and Protein Complexes.基于局部相互作用密度与蛋白质复合物新组合的必需蛋白质鉴定
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 30;10(6):e0131418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131418. eCollection 2015.
6
Comparison of the small molecule metabolic enzymes of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.大肠杆菌和酿酒酵母小分子代谢酶的比较
Genome Res. 2002 Jun;12(6):916-29. doi: 10.1101/gr.228002.
7
Higher-order genomic organization of cellular functions in yeast.酵母细胞功能的高阶基因组组织
J Comput Biol. 2009 Feb;16(2):303-16. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2008.15TT.
8
Comparative assessment of performance and genome dependence among phylogenetic profiling methods.系统发育谱分析方法之间性能和基因组依赖性的比较评估。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Sep 27;7:420. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-420.
9
Evolutionary cores of domain co-occurrence networks.结构域共现网络的进化核心
BMC Evol Biol. 2005 Mar 23;5:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-5-24.
10
A survey of computational methods for protein complex prediction from protein interaction networks.从蛋白质相互作用网络预测蛋白质复合物的计算方法综述。
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2013 Apr;11(2):1230002. doi: 10.1142/S021972001230002X. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Diverging co-translational protein complex assembly pathways are governed by interface energy distribution.分歧的共翻译蛋白质复合物组装途径由界面能量分布控制。
Nat Commun. 2024 Mar 25;15(1):2638. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46881-w.
2
Mechanisms of Cotranslational Protein Maturation in Bacteria.细菌中翻译共转运蛋白成熟的机制。
Front Mol Biosci. 2021 May 25;8:689755. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.689755. eCollection 2021.
3
Identification of protein complexes and functional modules in E. coli PPI networks.鉴定大肠杆菌蛋白质相互作用网络中的蛋白质复合物和功能模块。

本文引用的文献

1
Global functional atlas of Escherichia coli encompassing previously uncharacterized proteins.包含此前未被鉴定蛋白质的大肠杆菌全功能图谱。
PLoS Biol. 2009 Apr 28;7(4):e96. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000096.
2
Up-to-date catalogues of yeast protein complexes.最新的酵母蛋白质复合物目录。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Feb;37(3):825-31. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn1005. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
3
Complex fate of paralogs.旁系同源基因的复杂命运
BMC Microbiol. 2020 Aug 6;20(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01904-6.
4
Protein Melting Temperature Cannot Fully Assess Whether Protein Folding Free Energy Underlies the Universal Abundance-Evolutionary Rate Correlation Seen in Proteins.蛋白质融解温度无法全面评估蛋白质折叠自由能是否为蛋白质中所见的普遍丰度-进化速率相关性的基础。
Mol Biol Evol. 2019 Sep 1;36(9):1955-1963. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz119.
5
Diversity in protein domain superfamilies.蛋白质结构域超家族的多样性。
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2015 Dec;35:40-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
6
Coverage of protein domain families with structural protein-protein interactions: current progress and future trends.具有结构型蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用的蛋白质结构域家族覆盖情况:当前进展与未来趋势
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2014 Nov-Dec;116(2-3):187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
7
Evolutionary, physicochemical, and functional mechanisms of protein homooligomerization.蛋白质同源寡聚化的进化、物理化学和功能机制。
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2013;117:3-24. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386931-9.00001-5.
8
Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies.结构域超家族中的功能位点可塑性
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 May;1834(5):874-89. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.02.042. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
9
The evolution of multimeric protein assemblages.多聚体蛋白组装体的进化。
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 May;29(5):1353-66. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr300. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
10
The repatterning of eukaryotic genomes by random genetic drift.真核生物基因组的随机遗传漂变重组。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2011;12:347-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101412.
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Dec 18;8:337. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-337.
4
Protein complex evolution does not involve extensive network rewiring.蛋白质复合体的进化并不涉及广泛的网络重新布线。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Jul 25;4(7):e1000132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000132.
5
Fission yeast SWI/SNF and RSC complexes show compositional and functional differences from budding yeast.裂殖酵母的SWI/SNF和RSC复合物在组成和功能上与芽殖酵母存在差异。
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008 Aug;15(8):873-80. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1452. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
6
Functional maps of protein complexes from quantitative genetic interaction data.基于定量遗传相互作用数据构建的蛋白质复合物功能图谱。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Apr 18;4(4):e1000065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000065.
7
Integration of genomic data for inferring protein complexes from global protein-protein interaction networks.整合基因组数据以从全局蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络推断蛋白质复合物。
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2008 Feb;38(1):5-16. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2007.908912.
8
Are protein complexes made of cores, modules and attachments?蛋白质复合物是由核心、模块和附件组成的吗?
Proteomics. 2008 Feb;8(3):425-34. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700801.
9
MIPS: analysis and annotation of genome information in 2007.MIPS:2007年基因组信息的分析与注释
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D196-201. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm980. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
10
Predicting protein function with hierarchical phylogenetic profiles: the Gene3D Phylo-Tuner method applied to eukaryotic genomes.利用分层系统发育谱预测蛋白质功能:应用于真核生物基因组的Gene3D系统发育调整器方法
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Nov;3(11):e237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030237. Epub 2007 Oct 18.