伤口浸润或骶管镇痛提供的术后镇痛效果比较。
A comparison of postoperative analgesia provided by wound infiltration or caudal analgesia.
作者信息
Schindler M, Swann M, Crawford M
机构信息
Department of Anesthesia, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, N.S.W., Australia.
出版信息
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1991 Feb;19(1):46-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9101900108.
PMID:2012294
Abstract
A prospective randomised study was performed to compare postoperative analgesia produced by caudal block with that of local wound infiltration in 54 children following unilateral inguinal herniotomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the analgesia produced by these two methods. The requirement for additional postoperative analgesia and the incidence of side-effects was similar in the two groups.
摘要
进行了一项前瞻性随机研究，以比较54例单侧腹股沟疝修补术后儿童尾端阻滞与局部伤口浸润所产生的术后镇痛效果。这两种方法所产生的镇痛效果无统计学显著差异。两组术后额外镇痛的需求和副作用发生率相似。
Zotero 插件