Avorn J, Everitt D E, Baker M W
Geriatric Research and Training Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Arch Intern Med. 1991 Apr;151(4):694-8.
A random national sample of 501 physicians and 298 nurse practitioners was presented a case vignette describing a patient with epigastric pain and endoscopy showing diffuse gastritis. Respondents were encouraged to request further information and then were asked for recommendations. History available if requested included substantial use of aspirin, coffee, cigarettes, and alcohol, and severe psychosocial stress. More than one third of the physicians chose to initiate therapy without seeking a relevant history. Nearly half of all physicians indicated that a prescription would be the single most effective therapy; 65% recommended a histamine antagonist. By contrast, only 19% of nurse practitioners opted to treat without taking further history; the nurse sample asked an average of 2.6 questions vs 1.6 for physicians; only 20% of the nurses recommended a prescription medication. These findings raise concerns about the adequacy of basic history taking in this setting and the underuse of nonpharmacologic approaches in favor of excessive reliance on prescription drugs, even when not indicated by clinical circumstances.
对来自全国的501名医生和298名执业护士进行了随机抽样,向他们展示了一个病例摘要,描述了一名患有上腹部疼痛且内镜检查显示弥漫性胃炎的患者。鼓励受访者要求提供更多信息,然后询问他们的建议。如果被要求,可获得的病史包括大量使用阿司匹林、咖啡、香烟和酒精,以及严重的社会心理压力。超过三分之一的医生选择在不了解相关病史的情况下开始治疗。几乎所有医生中有近一半表示开处方将是最有效的单一治疗方法;65%的医生推荐使用组胺拮抗剂。相比之下,只有19%的执业护士选择在不进一步了解病史的情况下进行治疗;护士样本平均询问2.6个问题,而医生平均询问1.6个问题;只有20%的护士推荐使用处方药。这些发现引发了人们对这种情况下基本病史采集是否充分的担忧,以及对非药物治疗方法使用不足而过度依赖处方药的担忧,即使临床情况并未表明需要使用处方药。