Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010 Apr;22(2):129-33. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328336eb28.
The management of jaundice in the newborn infant is an area of clinical practice sorely lacking an evidence-based foundation, and neonatal bilirubin neurotoxicity (kernicterus) continues to occur worldwide.
Studies suggest that measuring serum or plasma bilirubin binding, in particular the nonalbumin-bound or unbound bilirubin concentration (Bf), would improve jaundice management as it better predicts bilirubin neurotoxicity than the conventionally used total bilirubin concentration (BT). However, many misconceptions persist regarding the relationships between BT, Bf, the magnitude and distribution of the neonatal bilirubin load, and the risk of bilirubin neurotoxicity.
Overcoming these misconceptions and integrating Bf and BT into the management of neonatal jaundice may help move clinical practice from its tradition-based approach centered primarily on BT toward an evidence-based approach that will substantially improve our ability to predict bilirubin neurotoxicity and improve the clinical management of this generally benign, but potentially catastrophic, newborn condition.
新生儿黄疸的管理是临床实践中严重缺乏循证基础的领域,新生儿胆红素神经毒性(核黄疸)仍在全球范围内发生。
研究表明,测量血清或血浆胆红素结合,特别是非白蛋白结合或未结合胆红素浓度(Bf),将改善黄疸管理,因为它比传统使用的总胆红素浓度(BT)更好地预测胆红素神经毒性。然而,关于 BT、Bf、新生儿胆红素负荷的大小和分布以及胆红素神经毒性的风险之间的关系,仍然存在许多误解。
克服这些误解,将 Bf 和 BT 纳入新生儿黄疸的管理中,可能有助于将临床实践从以 BT 为中心的传统方法转变为基于证据的方法,这将极大地提高我们预测胆红素神经毒性的能力,并改善这种通常良性但潜在灾难性的新生儿疾病的临床管理。