Nozari Nazbanou, Dell Gary S
Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 405 N. Matthews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
J Mem Lang. 2009 Feb 1;60(2):291-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.09.006.
The lexical bias effect (the tendency for phonological speech errors to create words more often than nonwords) has been debated for over 30 years. One account attributes the effect to a lexical editor, a strategic component of the production system that examines each planned phonological string, and suppresses it if it is a nonword. The alternative explanation is that the effect occurs automatically as a result of phonological-lexical feedback. Using a new paradigm, we explicitly asked participants to do lexical editing on their planned speech and compared performance on this inner lexical decision task to results obtained from the standard lexical decision task in three subsequent experiments. Our experimentally created "lexical editor" needed 300 ms to recognize and suppress nonwords, as determined by comparing reaction times when editing was and was not required. Therefore, we concluded that even though strategic lexical editing can be done, any such editing that occurs in daily speech occurs sporadically, if at all.
词汇偏向效应(即语音言语错误产生单词的频率高于非单词的倾向)已经被争论了30多年。一种解释将该效应归因于词汇编辑机制,它是生成系统的一个策略性组成部分,会检查每个计划好的语音串,如果是非单词则抑制它。另一种解释是,该效应是语音-词汇反馈的自动结果。在三个后续实验中,我们使用了一种新范式,明确要求参与者对他们计划的言语进行词汇编辑,并将这个内部词汇决策任务的表现与标准词汇决策任务的结果进行比较。通过比较需要编辑和不需要编辑时的反应时间,我们实验创建的“词汇编辑机制”识别并抑制非单词需要300毫秒。因此,我们得出结论,即使可以进行策略性词汇编辑,但在日常言语中,任何此类编辑即使会发生,也是偶尔发生的。