Suppr超能文献

关于词汇偏差的更多探讨:“词汇编辑工具”能有多高效?

More on Lexical Bias: How Efficient Can a "Lexical Editor" Be?

作者信息

Nozari Nazbanou, Dell Gary S

机构信息

Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 405 N. Matthews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2009 Feb 1;60(2):291-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.09.006.

Abstract

The lexical bias effect (the tendency for phonological speech errors to create words more often than nonwords) has been debated for over 30 years. One account attributes the effect to a lexical editor, a strategic component of the production system that examines each planned phonological string, and suppresses it if it is a nonword. The alternative explanation is that the effect occurs automatically as a result of phonological-lexical feedback. Using a new paradigm, we explicitly asked participants to do lexical editing on their planned speech and compared performance on this inner lexical decision task to results obtained from the standard lexical decision task in three subsequent experiments. Our experimentally created "lexical editor" needed 300 ms to recognize and suppress nonwords, as determined by comparing reaction times when editing was and was not required. Therefore, we concluded that even though strategic lexical editing can be done, any such editing that occurs in daily speech occurs sporadically, if at all.

摘要

词汇偏向效应(即语音言语错误产生单词的频率高于非单词的倾向)已经被争论了30多年。一种解释将该效应归因于词汇编辑机制,它是生成系统的一个策略性组成部分,会检查每个计划好的语音串,如果是非单词则抑制它。另一种解释是,该效应是语音-词汇反馈的自动结果。在三个后续实验中,我们使用了一种新范式,明确要求参与者对他们计划的言语进行词汇编辑,并将这个内部词汇决策任务的表现与标准词汇决策任务的结果进行比较。通过比较需要编辑和不需要编辑时的反应时间,我们实验创建的“词汇编辑机制”识别并抑制非单词需要300毫秒。因此,我们得出结论,即使可以进行策略性词汇编辑,但在日常言语中,任何此类编辑即使会发生,也是偶尔发生的。

相似文献

6
Phoneme and Stress Programming Interact During Nonword Repetition Learning.音素和重音编程在非词重复学习过程中相互作用。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jul 20;63(7):2219-2228. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00262. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
8
Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming.
Mem Cognit. 2002 Apr;30(3):399-411. doi: 10.3758/bf03194940.
9
Sequential dependencies in the lexical decision task.
Psychol Res. 1997;60(4):264-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00419412.

引用本文的文献

1
Is working memory domain-general or domain-specific?工作记忆是领域一般性的还是领域特殊性的?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Nov;28(11):1023-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.06.006. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
Predictive Coding and Internal Error Correction in Speech Production.言语产生中的预测编码与内部错误校正
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023 Mar 8;4(1):81-119. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00088. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Language production: Methods and methodologies.语言产生:方法与方法论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Dec;3(4):395-421. doi: 10.3758/BF03214545.
7
Spoonish spanerisms: A lexical bias effect in Spanish.勺子式言语错乱:西班牙语中的词汇偏向效应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):949-53. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.949.
9
A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task.词汇判断任务的扩散模型解释
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):159-82. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.159.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验