Suppr超能文献

词汇通达交互式两步模型的病例系列测试:从图片命名预测单词重复

A Case-Series Test of the Interactive Two-step Model of Lexical Access: Predicting Word Repetition from Picture Naming.

作者信息

Dell Gary S, Martin Nadine, Schwartz Myrna F

机构信息

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2007 May 1;56(4):490-520. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.007.

Abstract

Lexical access in language production, and particularly pathologies of lexical access, are often investigated by examining errors in picture naming and word repetition. In this article, we test a computational approach to lexical access, the two-step interactive model, by examining whether the model can quantitatively predict the repetition-error patterns of 65 aphasic subjects from their naming errors. The model's characterizations of the subjects' naming errors were taken from the companion paper to this one (Schwartz, Dell, N. Martin, Gahl & Sobel, 2006), and their repetition was predicted from the model on the assumption that naming involves two error prone steps, word and phonological retrieval, whereas repetition only creates errors in the second of these steps. A version of the model in which lexical-semantic and lexical-phonological connections could be independently lesioned was generally successful in predicting repetition for the aphasics. An analysis of the few cases in which model predictions were inaccurate revealed the role of input phonology in the repetition task.

摘要

语言产生中的词汇通达,尤其是词汇通达的病理学问题,常常通过检查图片命名和单词重复中的错误来进行研究。在本文中,我们通过检验该模型能否根据65名失语症患者的命名错误来定量预测其重复错误模式,对一种词汇通达的计算方法——两步交互模型进行了测试。该模型对患者命名错误的表征取自本文的姊妹论文(施瓦茨、戴尔、N. 马丁、加尔和索贝尔,2006年),并且在假设命名涉及两个容易出错的步骤(单词检索和语音检索)而重复仅在其中第二个步骤产生错误的前提下,根据该模型对他们的重复情况进行了预测。一个词汇语义和词汇语音连接可独立受损的模型版本在预测失语症患者的重复情况方面总体上是成功的。对少数模型预测不准确的案例进行的分析揭示了输入语音在重复任务中的作用。

相似文献

2
Naming and repetition in aphasia: Steps, routes, and frequency effects.
J Mem Lang. 2010 Nov 1;63(4):541-559. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.001.
3
Integrity of input verbal short-term memory ability predicts naming accuracy in aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2023;37(6):813-834. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2043233. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers.
Psychol Rev. 1997 Oct;104(4):801-38. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.4.801.
5
Lexical retrieval deficit in picture naming: implications for word production models.
Brain Lang. 1996 Jun;53(3):283-314. doi: 10.1006/brln.1996.0050.
6
The Roles of Retrieval Practice Versus Errorless Learning in Strengthening Lexical Access in Aphasia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jul 13;61(7):1700-1717. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0352.
7
Facilitation and interference in naming: A consequence of the same learning process?
Cognition. 2017 Aug;165:61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 May 11.
9
Origins of nonword phonological errors in aphasic picture naming.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004 Mar 1;21(2):159-86. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000519.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of different types of transcranial magnetic stimulation on post-stroke aphasia patients: a network meta-analysis.
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 28;16:1597504. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1597504. eCollection 2025.
3
The serial order system in word production and working memory: A case series approach.
Cortex. 2025 May;186:128-146. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.04.001. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
6
Revealing Linguistic and Verbal Short-Term and Working Memory Abilities in People with Severe Aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2024;38(10):1608-1643. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2322770. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
7
Establishing and evaluating the gradient of item naming difficulty in post-stroke aphasia and semantic dementia.
Cortex. 2024 Oct;179:103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.007. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
8
A Rose by Any Other Name: Mapping Taxonomic and Thematic Naming Errors Poststroke.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Oct 1;36(10):2251-2267. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02236.
9
Assessing Relative Linguistic Impairment With Model-Based Item Selection.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Aug 5;67(8):2600-2619. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00439. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
10
Four dimensions of naturalistic language production in aphasia after stroke.
Brain. 2025 Jan 7;148(1):291-312. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae195.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of semantic memory loss on phonological representations.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1994 Winter;6(1):57-69. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.57.
2
A semantic contribution to nonword recall? Evidence for intact phonological processes in semantic dementia.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005 Mar;22(2):183-212. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000068.
3
Interactivity and continuity in normal and aphasic language production.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005 Mar;22(2):131-68. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000031.
5
Models of errors of omission in aphasic naming.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004 Mar 1;21(2):125-45. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000320.
6
Connectionism and Cognitive Neuropsychology: Comments on Harley's Reflections.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004 Feb 1;21(1):27-30. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000168.
7
Brain imaging, connectionism, and cognitive neuropsychology.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004 Feb 1;21(1):21-5. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000159.
10
When does word meaning affect immediate serial recall in semantic dementia?
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Mar;4(1):20-42. doi: 10.3758/cabn.4.1.20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验