Dell Gary S, Martin Nadine, Schwartz Myrna F
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
J Mem Lang. 2007 May 1;56(4):490-520. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.007.
Lexical access in language production, and particularly pathologies of lexical access, are often investigated by examining errors in picture naming and word repetition. In this article, we test a computational approach to lexical access, the two-step interactive model, by examining whether the model can quantitatively predict the repetition-error patterns of 65 aphasic subjects from their naming errors. The model's characterizations of the subjects' naming errors were taken from the companion paper to this one (Schwartz, Dell, N. Martin, Gahl & Sobel, 2006), and their repetition was predicted from the model on the assumption that naming involves two error prone steps, word and phonological retrieval, whereas repetition only creates errors in the second of these steps. A version of the model in which lexical-semantic and lexical-phonological connections could be independently lesioned was generally successful in predicting repetition for the aphasics. An analysis of the few cases in which model predictions were inaccurate revealed the role of input phonology in the repetition task.
语言产生中的词汇通达,尤其是词汇通达的病理学问题,常常通过检查图片命名和单词重复中的错误来进行研究。在本文中,我们通过检验该模型能否根据65名失语症患者的命名错误来定量预测其重复错误模式,对一种词汇通达的计算方法——两步交互模型进行了测试。该模型对患者命名错误的表征取自本文的姊妹论文(施瓦茨、戴尔、N. 马丁、加尔和索贝尔,2006年),并且在假设命名涉及两个容易出错的步骤(单词检索和语音检索)而重复仅在其中第二个步骤产生错误的前提下,根据该模型对他们的重复情况进行了预测。一个词汇语义和词汇语音连接可独立受损的模型版本在预测失语症患者的重复情况方面总体上是成功的。对少数模型预测不准确的案例进行的分析揭示了输入语音在重复任务中的作用。