• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在生成指代表达时视觉语境的运用。

The use of visual context during the production of referring expressions.

作者信息

Fukumura Kumiko, van Gompel Roger P G, Pickering Martin J

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Sep;63(9):1700-15. doi: 10.1080/17470210903490969. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1080/17470210903490969
PMID:20127548
Abstract

Most theories of reference assume that a referent's saliency in the linguistic context determines the choice of referring expression. However, it is less clear whether cognitive factors relating to the nonlinguistic context also have an effect. We investigated whether visual context influences the choice of a pronoun over a repeated noun phrase when speakers refer back to a referent in a preceding sentence. In Experiment 1, linguistic mention as well as visual presence of a competitor with the same gender as the referent resulted in fewer pronouns for the referent, suggesting that both linguistic and visual context determined the choice of referring expression. Experiment 2 showed that even when the competitor had a different gender from the referent, its visual presence reduced pronoun use, indicating that visual context plays a role even if the use of a pronoun is unambiguous. Thus, both linguistic and nonlinguistic information affect the choice of referring expression.

摘要

大多数指称理论认为,所指对象在语言语境中的显著性决定了指称表达的选择。然而,与非语言语境相关的认知因素是否也有影响,这一点尚不太明确。我们研究了在说话者回指前一句中的所指对象时,视觉语境是否会影响代词相对于重复名词短语的选择。在实验1中,与所指对象性别相同的竞争者在语言提及以及视觉上的出现,导致用于所指对象的代词减少,这表明语言和视觉语境都决定了指称表达的选择。实验2表明,即使竞争者与所指对象性别不同,其视觉出现也会减少代词的使用,这表明即使代词的使用是明确的,视觉语境也会起作用。因此,语言和非语言信息都会影响指称表达的选择。

相似文献

1
The use of visual context during the production of referring expressions.在生成指代表达时视觉语境的运用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Sep;63(9):1700-15. doi: 10.1080/17470210903490969. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
2
Producing pronouns and definite noun phrases: do speakers use the addressee's discourse model?生成代词和定指名词短语:说话者是否使用了受话者的话语模型?
Cogn Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(7):1289-311. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01255.x. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
3
Ambiguous pronoun resolution: contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts.歧义代词解析:对比首次提及和主语偏好解释
Psychol Sci. 2005 Apr;16(4):260-4. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01525.x.
4
Is anaphoric reference cooperative?回指是合作性的吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(6):1109-28. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1070184. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
5
Is the generic pronoun he still comprehended as excluding women?通用代词“他”是否仍被理解为将女性排除在外?
Am J Psychol. 2009 Winter;122(4):483-96.
6
How WM load influences linguistic processing in adults: a computational model of pronoun interpretation in discourse.WM 负荷如何影响成人的语言处理:语篇中代词解释的计算模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;5(3):564-80. doi: 10.1111/tops.12029. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
7
Early decreases in alpha and gamma band power distinguish linguistic from visual information during spoken sentence comprehension.在口语句子理解过程中,α和γ波段功率的早期下降可区分语言信息与视觉信息。
Brain Res. 2008 Jul 11;1219:78-90. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.065. Epub 2008 May 1.
8
Differential effects of constraints in the processing of Russian cataphora.俄语前指处理中限制条件的差异效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Feb;63(2):371-400. doi: 10.1080/17470210902974120. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
9
Gender affects semantic competition: the effect of gender in a non-gender-marking language.性别影响语义竞争:非性别标记语言中的性别效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jul;39(4):1012-21. doi: 10.1037/a0031215. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
10
Informativity renders a referent more accessible: Evidence from eyetracking.信息性使所指对象更容易被获取:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):507-25. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0917-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking symbolic and visual context in Referring Expression Generation.重新思考指称表达生成中的符号和视觉语境。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Mar 21;6:1067125. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1067125. eCollection 2023.
2
The effects of semantic similarity on Mandarin speakers' referential expressions.语义相似性对普通话使用者指称表达的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Nov;76(11):2579-2595. doi: 10.1177/17470218231154578. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
3
Representations underlying pronoun choice in Italian and English.代词选择所依据的表象:意大利语与英语。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Aug;75(8):1428-1447. doi: 10.1177/17470218211051989. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
4
Talking about SOME and ALL: What determines the usage of quantity-denoting expressions?谈谈“一些”和“所有”:是什么决定了数量表达词的用法?
Discourse Process. 2018;55(8):686-703. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1317170. Epub 2017 May 25.
5
Referential Choices in a Collaborative Storytelling Task: Discourse Stages and Referential Complexity Matter.协作式故事讲述任务中的指称选择:语篇阶段和指称复杂性很重要。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 20;9:176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00176. eCollection 2018.
6
Referential choice in a second language: evidence for a listener-oriented approach.第二语言中的指称选择:以听众为导向方法的证据。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(10):1257-1272. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1220604. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
7
Cognitive Modeling of Individual Variation in Reference Production and Comprehension.指称生成与理解中个体差异的认知建模
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 7;7:506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00506. eCollection 2016.
8
Synthesizing meaning and processing approaches to prosody: performance matters.合成韵律的意义和处理方法:表现很重要。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015;30(1-2):88-102. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.840733.
9
Stored object knowledge and the production of referring expressions: the case of color typicality.存储的物体知识与指代表达的生成:以颜色典型性为例
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 6;6:935. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00935. eCollection 2015.
10
Integrating mechanisms of visual guidance in naturalistic language production.整合自然语言生成中视觉引导的机制。
Cogn Process. 2015 May;16(2):131-50. doi: 10.1007/s10339-014-0642-0. Epub 2014 Nov 23.