Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, California, USA.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Jun;29(5):783-8. doi: 10.1002/nau.20820.
Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) can mediate structural and functional detrusor changes, which can lead to bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms. We investigate if sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) can prevent these structural and functional changes in a rat model of BOO.
24 female Sprague-Dawley rats (250 gm) were divided into 4 groups: control (CTRL), BOO, SNS, and both (BOO/SNS). BOO was achieved by partially occluding the proximal urethra. SNS involved stimulating the S1-S4 dorsal roots with a unipolar S1 lead, 8 hours daily. Urodynamics were performed at baseline and after 6 weeks. Bladders were harvested, stained, and scored for detrusor hypertrophy and fibrosis (scale = 1-5).
BOO caused an increase in mean voiding pressure (P(det) = 35 +/- 2 mmHg vs. 23 +/- 1 mmHg, p = 0.02), an increase in mean bladder capacity (C = 1230 +/- 250 microl vs. 484 +/- 60 microl, p = 0.03), and a decrease in mean volume at first non-voiding contraction (67 +/- 16 microl vs. 110 +/- 24 microl, p = 0.02) compared to CTRL. Addition of SNS neither significantly affected P(det) (30 +/- 3 mm Hg vs. 35 +/- 2 mmHg, p = 0.2), nor C (630 +/- 90 microl vs. 1230 +/- 250 microl, p = 0.06) compared to BOO, but eliminated non-voiding contractions. Detrusor hypertrophy and fibrosis were both significantly greater in BOO vs. CTRL and vs. BOO/SNS.
Partial BOO caused functional and structural changes in the rat bladder. SNS in obstructed rats prevents these alterations, without adversely affecting detrusor contractility.
膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)可介导逼尿肌的结构和功能改变,从而导致烦人的下尿路症状。我们研究了骶神经刺激(SNS)是否可以预防 BOO 大鼠模型中的这些结构和功能变化。
将 24 只雌性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠(250 克)分为 4 组:对照组(CTRL)、BOO 组、SNS 组和 BOO/SNS 组。通过部分阻塞近端尿道来实现 BOO。SNS 通过单极 S1 导联刺激 S1-S4 背根来实现,每天 8 小时。在基线和 6 周后进行尿动力学检查。采集膀胱,染色,并对逼尿肌肥大和纤维化进行评分(评分范围为 1-5)。
BOO 导致平均排尿压(P(det))升高(35 +/- 2 mmHg 比 23 +/- 1 mmHg,p = 0.02),膀胱容量增加(C = 1230 +/- 250 microl 比 484 +/- 60 microl,p = 0.03),以及首次非逼尿收缩时的平均尿量减少(67 +/- 16 microl 比 110 +/- 24 microl,p = 0.02)与 CTRL 相比。与 BOO 相比,添加 SNS 既没有显著影响 P(det)(30 +/- 3 mmHg 比 35 +/- 2 mmHg,p = 0.2),也没有显著影响 C(630 +/- 90 microl 比 1230 +/- 250 microl,p = 0.06),但消除了非逼尿收缩。与 CTRL 和 BOO/SNS 相比,逼尿肌肥大和纤维化在 BOO 中均显著增加。
部分 BOO 导致大鼠膀胱的功能和结构改变。在梗阻大鼠中,SNS 可预防这些改变,而不会对逼尿肌收缩力产生不利影响。