• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗酒精问题时对饮酒目标的初始偏好:I. 戒酒组和非戒酒组的基线差异。

Initial preference for drinking goal in the treatment of alcohol problems: I. Baseline differences between abstinence and non-abstinence groups.

机构信息

Division of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.

出版信息

Alcohol Alcohol. 2010 Mar-Apr;45(2):128-35. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agp096.

DOI:10.1093/alcalc/agp096
PMID:20130149
Abstract

AIMS

To compare baseline characteristics of clients initially preferring abstinence with those preferring non-abstinence at the screening stage of a randomized controlled trial of treatment for alcohol problems (UKATT) and to identify predictors of goal preference from client characteristics present before the preference was stated.

METHODS

From discussions with clients entering the trial (N = 742), screeners noted whether clients were aiming for abstinence 'probably yes' or 'probably no'. Differences between the two groups thus formed were explored by univariate comparisons among client characteristics recorded at baseline assessment and by logistic regression analysis with pre-existing characteristics as independent variables.

RESULTS

Across all UKATT sites, 54.3% of clients expressed a preference for abstinence and 45.7% for non-abstinence. In univariate comparisons, clients preferring abstinence were significantly (P < 0.01) more likely to: (i) be female, (ii) be unemployed, (iii) report drinking more heavily but less frequently, (iv) have been detoxified in the 2 weeks prior to assessment, (v) report more alcohol problems, (vi) be in the action stage of change, (vii) report greater negative expectancies of drinking, (viii) report greater mental and physical ill-health, (ix) report less social support for drinking and (x) be more confident of their ability to resist heavy drinking in tempting situations. In the logistic regression model, the strongest predictors of goal preference were gender, drinking pattern, recent detoxification and social support for drinking.

CONCLUSION

The implications of these findings for service delivery are best considered in conjunction with findings from a companion paper reporting treatment outcomes associated with each goal preference.

摘要

目的

比较随机对照试验(UKATT)治疗酒精问题筛选阶段最初选择戒酒和非戒酒的客户的基线特征,并确定在陈述目标偏好之前存在的客户特征预测目标偏好。

方法

从参与试验的客户讨论中(N=742),筛查人员注意到客户是否“可能是”或“可能否”戒酒。通过在基线评估中记录的客户特征的单变量比较和使用现有特征作为自变量的逻辑回归分析,探讨由此形成的两组之间的差异。

结果

在所有 UKATT 地点,54.3%的客户表示倾向于戒酒,45.7%的客户倾向于非戒酒。在单变量比较中,选择戒酒的客户更有可能(P < 0.01):(i)女性,(ii)失业,(iii)报告饮酒量较大但频率较低,(iv)在评估前 2 周已戒毒,(v)报告更多的酒精问题,(vi)处于改变的行动阶段,(vii)报告更多的负面饮酒期望,(viii)报告更多的精神和身体不健康,(ix)报告较少的饮酒社交支持,(x)在诱人的情况下更有信心抵制豪饮。在逻辑回归模型中,目标偏好的最强预测因素是性别、饮酒模式、最近的戒毒和饮酒的社会支持。

结论

这些发现对服务提供的影响最好与报告与每个目标偏好相关的治疗结果的伴生文件的发现一起考虑。

相似文献

1
Initial preference for drinking goal in the treatment of alcohol problems: I. Baseline differences between abstinence and non-abstinence groups.治疗酒精问题时对饮酒目标的初始偏好:I. 戒酒组和非戒酒组的基线差异。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2010 Mar-Apr;45(2):128-35. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agp096.
2
Initial preference for drinking goal in the treatment of alcohol problems: II. Treatment outcomes.治疗酒精问题时对饮酒目标的初始偏好:二、治疗结果。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2010 Mar-Apr;45(2):136-42. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agq005.
3
Drinking Goal Trajectories and Their Association with Client Characteristics and Outcomes among Clients in Outpatient Alcohol Treatment.门诊酒精治疗患者的饮酒目标轨迹及其与患者特征和结局的关系。
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Nov 10;53(13):2140-2151. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1461222. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
4
Efficacy of extended-release naltrexone in patients with relatively higher severity of alcohol dependence.长效纳曲酮治疗酒精依赖严重程度相对较高患者的疗效。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011 Oct;35(10):1804-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01524.x. Epub 2011 May 16.
5
Accounting for self-selected drinking goals in the assessment of treatment outcome.在治疗结果评估中考虑自我选择的饮酒目标。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Sep;22(3):439-43. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.3.439.
6
The effect of drinking goals at treatment entry on longitudinal alcohol use patterns among adults with alcohol dependence.治疗开始时饮酒目标对酒精依赖成年人纵向饮酒模式的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Sep 1;132(1-2):182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
7
Drinking goal selection in behavioral self-management treatment of chronic alcoholics.慢性酗酒者行为自我管理治疗中的饮酒目标选择
Addict Behav. 1997 Mar-Apr;22(2):247-55. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(96)00013-5.
8
Exploring treatment attendance and its relationship to outcome in a randomized controlled trial of treatment for alcohol problems: secondary analysis of the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT).探索治疗依从性及其与酒精问题治疗随机对照试验结局的关系:英国酒精治疗试验(UKATT)的二次分析。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2011 Sep-Oct;46(5):592-9. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agr079. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
9
Predicting drinking outcomes: Evidence from the United Kingdom Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT).预测饮酒结果:来自英国酒精治疗试验(UKATT)的证据。
Addict Behav. 2017 Aug;71:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.02.023. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
10
Abstinence expectancy and abstinence among men undergoing inpatient treatment for alcoholism.接受住院戒酒治疗的男性的戒酒期望与戒酒情况
J Subst Abuse. 1991;3(1):39-57. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(05)80005-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of varenicline and bupropion, in combination and alone, for alcohol use disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial.伐尼克兰与安非他酮联合及单独使用治疗酒精使用障碍的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的多中心试验。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 May 13;54:101310. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101310. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial on the efficacy of varenicline and bupropion in combination and alone for treatment of alcohol use disorder: Protocol for the COMB study.一项关于伐尼克兰和安非他酮联合及单药治疗酒精使用障碍疗效的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心试验:COMB 研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 11;19(1):e0296118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296118. eCollection 2024.
3
The Relationship between Mindfulness and Readiness to Change in Alcohol Drinkers.饮酒者的正念与改变意愿之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 1;20(9):5690. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095690.
4
Prior Periods of Abstinence Among Adults With an Alcohol Use Disorder: A Qualitative Template Analysis.患有酒精使用障碍的成年人之前的戒酒期:一项定性模板分析
Subst Abuse. 2023 Mar 22;17:11782218231162468. doi: 10.1177/11782218231162468. eCollection 2023.
5
Modeling ability to resist alcohol in the human laboratory: A pilot study.人类实验室中抗酒精能力的建模:一项初步研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Oct 7;5:100105. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100105. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Using machine learning to examine predictors of treatment goal change among individuals seeking treatment for alcohol use disorder.利用机器学习检查寻求治疗酒精使用障碍的个体治疗目标变化的预测因素。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Sep;140:108825. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108825. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
7
Expanding the continuum of substance use disorder treatment: Nonabstinence approaches.扩展物质使用障碍治疗的连续体:非戒除方法。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2022 Feb;91:102110. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102110. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
8
Long-term safety and efficacy of nalmefene in Japanese patients with alcohol dependence.纳美芬治疗日本酒精依赖患者的长期安全性和有效性。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Aug;74(8):431-438. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13017. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
World Health Organization risk drinking level reductions are associated with improved functioning and are sustained among patients with mild, moderate and severe alcohol dependence in clinical trials in the United States and United Kingdom.世界卫生组织降低风险饮酒水平与改善功能有关,并且在美国和英国的临床试验中,在轻度、中度和重度酒精依赖患者中持续存在。
Addiction. 2020 Sep;115(9):1668-1680. doi: 10.1111/add.15011. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
10
Preresolution Drinking Problem Severity Profiles Associated with Stable Moderation Outcomes of Natural Recovery Attempts.预解决饮酒问题严重程度特征与自然康复尝试稳定节制结果相关。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Mar;44(3):738-745. doi: 10.1111/acer.14287. Epub 2020 Feb 18.