• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Subsidized Contraception, Fertility, and Sexual Behavior.补贴避孕、生育与性行为
Rev Econ Stat. 2009 Oct 1;91(1):137. doi: 10.1162/rest.91.1.137.
2
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.公共资助的避孕服务对意外怀孕的影响及其对医疗补助支出的意义。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95.
3
A benefit-cost analysis of family planning services in Iowa.爱荷华州计划生育服务的效益成本分析。
Eval Health Prof. 1988 Dec;11(4):403-24. doi: 10.1177/016327878801100401.
4
States continue to expand eligibility for family planning services under Medicaid.各州继续扩大医疗补助计划下计划生育服务的资格范围。
State Reprod Health Monit. 1996 Sep;7(3):3-5.
5
Is Medicaid pronatalist? The effect of eligibility expansions on abortions and births.医疗补助计划是否鼓励生育?资格扩张对堕胎和生育的影响。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 May-Jun;30(3):108-13, 127.
6
Family planning services in the United States.美国的计划生育服务。
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1975;9(2):124-8.
7
[Fertility trends and socioeconomic development in the Philippines].[菲律宾的生育趋势与社会经济发展]
Demogr Inf. 1991:48-52, 154.
8
Assessment of the fertility impact of family planning programmes in Egypt.埃及计划生育项目对生育影响的评估。
Egypt Popul Fam Plann Rev. 1990 Dec;24(2):42-59.
9
A brief introduction to China's family planning programme.中国计划生育政策简介。
China Popul Newsl. 1984 Aug;1(3):4-10.
10
Estimating the fertility effect of expansions of publicly funded family planning services in California.估计加利福尼亚州扩大公共资助计划生育服务的生育效果。
Womens Health Issues. 2011 Nov-Dec;21(6):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Who Is Financially Constrained in Their Choice of Contraceptive Method? Lessons from M-CARES.在避孕方法选择上哪些人面临经济限制?来自M-CARES的经验教训。
AEA Pap Proc. 2024 May;114:442-448. doi: 10.1257/pandp.20241108.
2
First-in-line subcutaneous injectable for reversible, non-hormonal male contraception.首款用于可逆性、非激素男性避孕的皮下注射药物。
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1007/s13346-025-01871-3.
3
Economic opportunity begins with contraception: Comment on "Intergenerational Mobility Begins Before Birth" by Ananth Seshadri, Anson Zhou.经济机遇始于避孕:评阿南特·塞沙德里、安森·周所著的《代际流动始于出生之前》
J Monet Econ. 2022 Jul;129:21-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 May 18.
4
The Missing Baby Bust: The Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic for Contraceptive Use, Pregnancy, and Childbirth Among Low-Income Women.失踪的婴儿潮:新冠疫情对低收入女性避孕、怀孕及分娩的影响
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022;41(4):1549-1569. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09703-9. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
5
Coverage Effects of the ACA's Medicaid Expansion on Adult Reproductive-Aged Women, Postpartum Mothers, and Mothers with Older Children.ACA 医保扩面对成年育龄妇女、产后母亲和有大龄儿童母亲的覆盖效果。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 May;26(5):1104-1114. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03384-8. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
6
The children of the missed pill.漏服药物的儿童。
J Health Econ. 2021 Sep;79:102496. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102496. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
7
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of the Nurse-Family Partnership's home visiting program in South Carolina on maternal and child health outcomes.一项评价南卡罗来纳州“护士-家庭合作”家访项目对母婴健康结局影响的随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2020 Dec 4;21(1):997. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04916-9.
8
Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.州层面的医疗保险覆盖情况与避孕药具使用:2017年行为风险因素监测系统的调查结果
Contracept X. 2019 Nov 15;2:100014. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2019.100014. eCollection 2020.
9
Family planning and fertility in South Africa under apartheid.种族隔离制度下南非的计划生育与生育情况
Eur Rev Econ Hist. 2019 Aug;23(3):365-395. doi: 10.1093/ereh/hey016. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
10
Does Access to Family Planning Increase Children's Opportunities? Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X.获得计划生育服务会增加儿童的机会吗?来自反贫困战争和第十章早期的证据。
J Hum Resour. 2019 Fall;54(4):825-856. doi: 10.3368/jhr.54.4.1216-8401R1. Epub 2019 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of Medicaid family planning expansions on unplanned births.医疗补助计划中计划生育服务扩展对意外怀孕生育的影响。
Womens Health Issues. 2007 Mar-Apr;17(2):66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2007.02.012.
2
Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.美国女性的生育力、计划生育与生殖健康:来自2002年全国家庭成长调查的数据
Vital Health Stat 23. 2005 Dec(25):1-160.
3
Births: final data for 2003.出生情况:2003年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005 Sep 8;54(2):1-116.
4
The availability and use of publicly funded family planning clinics: U.S. trends, 1994-2001.公共资助的计划生育诊所的可及性与使用情况:美国趋势,1994 - 2001年
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;36(5):206-15. doi: 10.1363/psrh.36.206.04.
5
Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000.2000年美国的堕胎发生率及服务情况。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;35(1):6-15. doi: 10.1363/3500603.
6
The impact of government policies and neighborhood characteristics on teenage sexual activity and contraceptive use.政府政策和社区特征对青少年性行为及避孕措施使用的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2002 Nov;92(11):1773-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.11.1773.
7
Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.减少青少年意外怀孕的干预措施:随机对照试验的系统评价
BMJ. 2002 Jun 15;324(7351):1426. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1426.
8
The economics of family planning and underage conceptions.计划生育与未成年怀孕的经济学
J Health Econ. 2002 Mar;21(2):207-25. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00115-1.
9
Reproductive health services for adolescents under the State Children's Health Insurance Program.国家儿童健康保险计划下为青少年提供的生殖健康服务。
Fam Plann Perspect. 2001 Mar-Apr;33(2):81-7.
10
Teenage abortion and pregnancy statistics by state, 1996.1996年各州青少年堕胎与怀孕统计数据。
Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 Nov-Dec;32(6):272-80.

补贴避孕、生育与性行为

Subsidized Contraception, Fertility, and Sexual Behavior.

作者信息

Kearney Melissa S, Levine Phillip B

机构信息

Department of Economics, Wellesley College, and NBER.

出版信息

Rev Econ Stat. 2009 Oct 1;91(1):137. doi: 10.1162/rest.91.1.137.

DOI:10.1162/rest.91.1.137
PMID:20130787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2815331/
Abstract

We examine the impact of recent state-level Medicaid policy changes that expanded eligibility for family planning services to higher-income women and to Medicaid clients whose benefits would expire otherwise. We show that the income-based policy change reduced overall births to non-teens by about 2% and to teens by over 4%; estimates suggest a decline of 9% among newly eligible women. The reduction in fertility appears to have been accomplished via greater use of contraception. Our calculations indicate that allowing higher-income women to receive federally funded family planning cost on the order of $6,800 for each averted birth.

摘要

我们研究了近期州层面医疗补助政策变化的影响,这些变化将计划生育服务的资格扩大到了高收入女性以及那些福利否则就会过期的医疗补助客户。我们发现,基于收入的政策变化使非青少年的总体生育率降低了约2%,青少年的生育率降低了超过4%;据估计,新符合资格的女性生育率下降了9%。生育率的下降似乎是通过更多地使用避孕措施实现的。我们的计算表明,让高收入女性获得联邦资助的计划生育服务,每避免一例生育的成本约为6800美元。