• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获得计划生育服务会增加儿童的机会吗?来自反贫困战争和第十章早期的证据。

Does Access to Family Planning Increase Children's Opportunities? Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X.

作者信息

Bailey Martha J, Malkova Olga, McLaren Zoë M

机构信息

University of Michigan, 611 Tappan Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109;

University of Kentucky, Gatton College of Business and Economics, Lexington, KY, 40502;

出版信息

J Hum Resour. 2019 Fall;54(4):825-856. doi: 10.3368/jhr.54.4.1216-8401R1. Epub 2019 Oct 2.

DOI:10.3368/jhr.54.4.1216-8401R1
PMID:31768076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6876122/
Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between parents' access to family planning and the economic resources of their children. Using the county-level introduction of U.S. family planning programs between 1964 and 1973, we find that children born after programs began had 2.8% higher household incomes. They were also 7% less likely to live in poverty and 12% less likely to live in households receiving public assistance. A bounding exercise suggests that the direct effects of family planning programs on parents' resources account for roughly two-thirds of these gains.

摘要

本文考察了父母获得计划生育服务与子女经济资源之间的关系。利用1964年至1973年间美国计划生育项目在县级层面的推行情况,我们发现项目开始后出生的孩子家庭收入高出2.8%。他们生活在贫困中的可能性也降低了7%,生活在接受公共援助家庭中的可能性降低了12%。一项边界分析表明,计划生育项目对父母资源的直接影响约占这些收益的三分之二。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98be/6876122/85736d2260bc/nihms-1006442-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98be/6876122/f9f84e6a65e0/nihms-1006442-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98be/6876122/93e1ad510fee/nihms-1006442-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98be/6876122/85736d2260bc/nihms-1006442-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98be/6876122/f9f84e6a65e0/nihms-1006442-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98be/6876122/93e1ad510fee/nihms-1006442-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98be/6876122/85736d2260bc/nihms-1006442-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Does Access to Family Planning Increase Children's Opportunities? Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X.获得计划生育服务会增加儿童的机会吗?来自反贫困战争和第十章早期的证据。
J Hum Resour. 2019 Fall;54(4):825-856. doi: 10.3368/jhr.54.4.1216-8401R1. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
2
Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.取暖还是吃饭:低收入家庭能源援助计划与3岁以下儿童的营养和健康风险
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1293-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2943.
3
DO FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS DECREASE POVERTY? EVIDENCE FROM PUBLIC CENSUS DATA.计划生育项目能减少贫困吗?来自公开人口普查数据的证据。
CESifo Econ Stud. 2014;60(2):312-337. doi: 10.1093/cesifo/ifu011.
4
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
5
Cash Transfers and Child and Adolescent Development现金转移与儿童及青少年发展
6
Reexamining the Impact of Family Planning Programs on US Fertility: Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X().重新审视计划生育项目对美国生育率的影响:来自反贫困战争和第十类项目早期的证据
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2012 Apr;4(2):62-97. doi: 10.1257/app.4.2.62.
7
Poverty in America: trends and new patterns.美国的贫困:趋势与新模式。
Popul Bull. 1985 Jun;40(3):1-44.
8
Comparison of Health, Development, Maternal Bonding, and Poverty Among Children Born After Denial of Abortion vs After Pregnancies Subsequent to an Abortion.比较拒绝堕胎和堕胎后继续妊娠所生孩子的健康、发育、母婴关系和贫困情况。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Nov 1;172(11):1053-1060. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1785.
9
Promoting Children's Physical Activity in Low-Income Communities in Colorado: What Are the Barriers and Opportunities?在科罗拉多州的低收入社区促进儿童身体活动:有哪些障碍和机会?
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Dec 14;14:E134. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170111.
10
Parents' Incomes and Children's Outcomes: A Quasi-Experiment.父母收入与子女成长结果:一项准实验
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2010 Jan;2(1):86-115. doi: 10.1257/app.2.1.86.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of universal no-cost coverage on use of long-acting reversible contraception and all prescription contraception: population based, controlled, interrupted time series analysis.全民免费覆盖对长效可逆避孕法及所有处方避孕法使用情况的影响:基于人群的对照中断时间序列分析
BMJ. 2025 Jul 28;390:e083874. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083874.
2
Economic opportunity begins with contraception: Comment on "Intergenerational Mobility Begins Before Birth" by Ananth Seshadri, Anson Zhou.经济机遇始于避孕:评阿南特·塞沙德里、安森·周所著的《代际流动始于出生之前》
J Monet Econ. 2022 Jul;129:21-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 May 18.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Economic Status and Health in Childhood: The Origins of the Gradient.儿童时期的经济状况与健康:梯度的起源。
Am Econ Rev. 2002;92(5):1308-34. doi: 10.1257/000282802762024520.
2
Early-life origins of life-cycle well-being: research and policy implications.生命周期幸福感的生命周期起源:研究和政策意义。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2015 Winter;34(1):208-42. doi: 10.1002/pam.21805.
3
Fifty Years of Family Planning: New Evidence on the Long-Run Effects of Increasing Access to Contraception.计划生育五十年:增加避孕措施可及性的长期影响新证据
Prep School for Poor Kids: The Long-Run Impacts of Head Start on Human Capital and Economic Self-Sufficiency.
贫困儿童预科学校:“启智计划”对人力资本和经济自给自足的长期影响。
Am Econ Rev. 2021 Dec;111(12):3963-4001. doi: 10.1257/aer.20181801.
4
Contraceptive Consistency and Poverty after Birth.产后避孕的持续性与贫困状况
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2021 Dec;40(6):1277-1311. doi: 10.1007/s11113-020-09623-6. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
5
The children of the missed pill.漏服药物的儿童。
J Health Econ. 2021 Sep;79:102496. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102496. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
6
The long-term impact of restricted access to abortion on children's socioeconomic outcomes.限制堕胎对儿童社会经济结果的长期影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0248638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248638. eCollection 2021.
7
Strengthening society with contraception.以避孕措施增强社会力量。
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7838):S162-S164. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-03530-8.
8
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of the Nurse-Family Partnership's home visiting program in South Carolina on maternal and child health outcomes.一项评价南卡罗来纳州“护士-家庭合作”家访项目对母婴健康结局影响的随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2020 Dec 4;21(1):997. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04916-9.
9
Trends in Birth Rates After Elimination of Cost Sharing for Contraception by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案取消避孕费用分担后出生率的变化趋势》。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24398.
10
DO FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS DECREASE POVERTY? EVIDENCE FROM PUBLIC CENSUS DATA.计划生育项目能减少贫困吗?来自公开人口普查数据的证据。
CESifo Econ Stud. 2014;60(2):312-337. doi: 10.1093/cesifo/ifu011.
Brookings Pap Econ Act. 2013 Spring;2013:341-409. doi: 10.1353/eca.2013.0001.
4
The intergenerational transmission of inequality: maternal disadvantage and health at birth.代际不平等传递:母亲劣势与出生健康。
Science. 2014 May 23;344(6186):856-61. doi: 10.1126/science.1251872.
5
Marriage Meets the Joneses: Relative Income, Identity, and Marital Status.婚姻与攀比:相对收入、身份认同和婚姻状况
J Hum Resour. 2011 Jun 20;46(3):482-517. doi: 10.3368/jhr.46.3.482.
6
Abortion before & after Roe.罗诉韦德案前后的堕胎情况。
J Health Econ. 2013 Sep;32(5):804-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
7
The Opt-In Revolution? Contraception and the Gender Gap in Wages.选择加入的革命?避孕与工资性别差距
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2012 Jul;4(3):225-254. doi: 10.1257/app.4.3.225.
8
Reexamining the Impact of Family Planning Programs on US Fertility: Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X().重新审视计划生育项目对美国生育率的影响:来自反贫困战争和第十类项目早期的证据
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2012 Apr;4(2):62-97. doi: 10.1257/app.4.2.62.
9
The Power of the Pill for the Next Generation: Oral Contraception's Effects on Fertility, Abortion, and Maternal & Child Characteristics.避孕药对下一代的影响:口服避孕药对生育能力、堕胎以及母婴特征的作用
Rev Econ Stat. 2012 Feb 1;94(1):37-51. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00230.
10
Subsidized Contraception, Fertility, and Sexual Behavior.补贴避孕、生育与性行为
Rev Econ Stat. 2009 Oct 1;91(1):137. doi: 10.1162/rest.91.1.137.