获得计划生育服务会增加儿童的机会吗？来自反贫困战争和第十章早期的证据。
Does Access to Family Planning Increase Children's Opportunities? Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X.
作者信息
Bailey Martha J, Malkova Olga, McLaren Zoë M
机构信息
University of Michigan, 611 Tappan Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109;
University of Kentucky, Gatton College of Business and Economics, Lexington, KY, 40502;
出版信息
J Hum Resour. 2019 Fall;54(4):825-856. doi: 10.3368/jhr.54.4.1216-8401R1. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between parents' access to family planning and the economic resources of their children. Using the county-level introduction of U.S. family planning programs between 1964 and 1973, we find that children born after programs began had 2.8% higher household incomes. They were also 7% less likely to live in poverty and 12% less likely to live in households receiving public assistance. A bounding exercise suggests that the direct effects of family planning programs on parents' resources account for roughly two-thirds of these gains.
摘要
本文考察了父母获得计划生育服务与子女经济资源之间的关系。利用1964年至1973年间美国计划生育项目在县级层面的推行情况，我们发现项目开始后出生的孩子家庭收入高出2.8%。他们生活在贫困中的可能性也降低了7%，生活在接受公共援助家庭中的可能性降低了12%。一项边界分析表明，计划生育项目对父母资源的直接影响约占这些收益的三分之二。
相似文献
1
Does Access to Family Planning Increase Children's Opportunities? Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X.获得计划生育服务会增加儿童的机会吗？来自反贫困战争和第十章早期的证据。
J Hum Resour. 2019 Fall;54(4):825-856. doi: 10.3368/jhr.54.4.1216-8401R1. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
2
Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.取暖还是吃饭：低收入家庭能源援助计划与3岁以下儿童的营养和健康风险
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1293-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2943.
3
DO FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS DECREASE POVERTY? EVIDENCE FROM PUBLIC CENSUS DATA.计划生育项目能减少贫困吗？来自公开人口普查数据的证据。
CESifo Econ Stud. 2014;60(2):312-337. doi: 10.1093/cesifo/ifu011.
4
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学：家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
6
Reexamining the Impact of Family Planning Programs on US Fertility: Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X().重新审视计划生育项目对美国生育率的影响：来自反贫困战争和第十类项目早期的证据
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2012 Apr;4(2):62-97. doi: 10.1257/app.4.2.62.
7
Poverty in America: trends and new patterns.美国的贫困：趋势与新模式。
Popul Bull. 1985 Jun;40(3):1-44.
8
Comparison of Health, Development, Maternal Bonding, and Poverty Among Children Born After Denial of Abortion vs After Pregnancies Subsequent to an Abortion.比较拒绝堕胎和堕胎后继续妊娠所生孩子的健康、发育、母婴关系和贫困情况。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Nov 1;172(11):1053-1060. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1785.
9
Promoting Children's Physical Activity in Low-Income Communities in Colorado: What Are the Barriers and Opportunities?在科罗拉多州的低收入社区促进儿童身体活动：有哪些障碍和机会？
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Dec 14;14:E134. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170111.
10
Parents' Incomes and Children's Outcomes: A Quasi-Experiment.父母收入与子女成长结果：一项准实验
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2010 Jan;2(1):86-115. doi: 10.1257/app.2.1.86.
引用本文的文献
1
Effect of universal no-cost coverage on use of long-acting reversible contraception and all prescription contraception: population based, controlled, interrupted time series analysis.全民免费覆盖对长效可逆避孕法及所有处方避孕法使用情况的影响：基于人群的对照中断时间序列分析
BMJ. 2025 Jul 28;390:e083874. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083874.
2
Economic opportunity begins with contraception: Comment on "Intergenerational Mobility Begins Before Birth" by Ananth Seshadri, Anson Zhou.经济机遇始于避孕：评阿南特·塞沙德里、安森·周所著的《代际流动始于出生之前》
J Monet Econ. 2022 Jul;129:21-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 May 18.
3
Prep School for Poor Kids: The Long-Run Impacts of Head Start on Human Capital and Economic Self-Sufficiency.贫困儿童预科学校：“启智计划”对人力资本和经济自给自足的长期影响。
Am Econ Rev. 2021 Dec;111(12):3963-4001. doi: 10.1257/aer.20181801.
4
Contraceptive Consistency and Poverty after Birth.产后避孕的持续性与贫困状况
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2021 Dec;40(6):1277-1311. doi: 10.1007/s11113-020-09623-6. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
5
The children of the missed pill.漏服药物的儿童。
J Health Econ. 2021 Sep;79:102496. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102496. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
6
The long-term impact of restricted access to abortion on children's socioeconomic outcomes.限制堕胎对儿童社会经济结果的长期影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0248638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248638. eCollection 2021.
7
Strengthening society with contraception.以避孕措施增强社会力量。
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7838):S162-S164. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-03530-8.
8
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of the Nurse-Family Partnership's home visiting program in South Carolina on maternal and child health outcomes.一项评价南卡罗来纳州“护士-家庭合作”家访项目对母婴健康结局影响的随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2020 Dec 4;21(1):997. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04916-9.
9
Trends in Birth Rates After Elimination of Cost Sharing for Contraception by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案取消避孕费用分担后出生率的变化趋势》。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24398.
10
DO FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS DECREASE POVERTY? EVIDENCE FROM PUBLIC CENSUS DATA.计划生育项目能减少贫困吗？来自公开人口普查数据的证据。
CESifo Econ Stud. 2014;60(2):312-337. doi: 10.1093/cesifo/ifu011.
本文引用的文献
1
Economic Status and Health in Childhood: The Origins of the Gradient.儿童时期的经济状况与健康：梯度的起源。
Am Econ Rev. 2002;92(5):1308-34. doi: 10.1257/000282802762024520.
2
Early-life origins of life-cycle well-being: research and policy implications.生命周期幸福感的生命周期起源：研究和政策意义。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2015 Winter;34(1):208-42. doi: 10.1002/pam.21805.
3
Fifty Years of Family Planning: New Evidence on the Long-Run Effects of Increasing Access to Contraception.计划生育五十年：增加避孕措施可及性的长期影响新证据
Brookings Pap Econ Act. 2013 Spring;2013:341-409. doi: 10.1353/eca.2013.0001.
4
The intergenerational transmission of inequality: maternal disadvantage and health at birth.代际不平等传递：母亲劣势与出生健康。
Science. 2014 May 23;344(6186):856-61. doi: 10.1126/science.1251872.
5
Marriage Meets the Joneses: Relative Income, Identity, and Marital Status.婚姻与攀比：相对收入、身份认同和婚姻状况
J Hum Resour. 2011 Jun 20;46(3):482-517. doi: 10.3368/jhr.46.3.482.
6
Abortion before & after Roe.罗诉韦德案前后的堕胎情况。
J Health Econ. 2013 Sep;32(5):804-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
7
The Opt-In Revolution? Contraception and the Gender Gap in Wages.选择加入的革命？避孕与工资性别差距
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2012 Jul;4(3):225-254. doi: 10.1257/app.4.3.225.
8
Reexamining the Impact of Family Planning Programs on US Fertility: Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X().重新审视计划生育项目对美国生育率的影响：来自反贫困战争和第十类项目早期的证据
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2012 Apr;4(2):62-97. doi: 10.1257/app.4.2.62.
9
The Power of the Pill for the Next Generation: Oral Contraception's Effects on Fertility, Abortion, and Maternal & Child Characteristics.避孕药对下一代的影响：口服避孕药对生育能力、堕胎以及母婴特征的作用
Rev Econ Stat. 2012 Feb 1;94(1):37-51. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00230.
10
Subsidized Contraception, Fertility, and Sexual Behavior.补贴避孕、生育与性行为
Rev Econ Stat. 2009 Oct 1;91(1):137. doi: 10.1162/rest.91.1.137.
Zotero 插件