Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Foundation, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.
Cancer Sci. 2010 Mar;101(3):826-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01472.x. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
(Cancer Sci 2010; 101: 826-830) The purpose was to ascertain whether the recurrence risk patterns for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (P) and ER-negative (N) breast cancer support the ER-related clinical divergence suggested by the observed different mortality patterns and gene expression profiles. Both recurrence and death were considered in a series of 771 patients undergoing mastectomy. ER status was available for 539 patients. The hazard rates for recurrence and mortality throughout 15 years of follow-up were assessed. The recurrence dynamics displays a bimodal pattern for both ERP and ERN tumors with comparable peak timings. The two curves cross during the 3rd year. By contrast, the mortality dynamics are definitely different for ERP and ERN tumors: during the early follow-up period ERN patients have their highest mortality risk, while ERP patients have their lowest mortality risk. The two curves cross during the 5th year. In spite of the different mortality dynamics, the recurrence dynamics do not demonstrate a major distinction in timing between ERP and ERN breast cancers, suggesting that the metastasis development process following mastectomy is apparently similar for both ER categories. The observed differences in the mortality risk are plausibly attributable to ER-related factors influencing the clinical course from recurrence to death. These clinical findings apparently contradict the occurrence of two different types of breast cancer, notwithstanding the distinct epidemiological, clinical, and molecular features linked to ERP and ERN tumors, although ER levels may concur to establish the event risk levels.
(Cancer Sci 2010; 101: 826-830)目的是确定雌激素受体(ER)阳性(P)和 ER 阴性(N)乳腺癌患者的复发风险模式是否支持观察到的不同死亡率模式和基因表达谱所提示的与 ER 相关的临床差异。对 771 例接受乳房切除术的患者进行了一系列复发和死亡考虑。有 539 名患者可获得 ER 状态。评估了 15 年随访期间复发和死亡率的危险率。对于 ERP 和 ERN 肿瘤,复发动态均呈现双峰模式,峰值时间相当。两条曲线在第 3 年相交。相比之下,ERP 和 ERN 肿瘤的死亡率动态明显不同:在早期随访期间,ERN 患者的死亡率风险最高,而 ERP 患者的死亡率风险最低。两条曲线在第 5 年相交。尽管死亡率动态不同,但 ERP 和 ERN 乳腺癌的复发动态在时间上并没有明显区别,这表明乳房切除术后面临转移发展的过程对这两种 ER 类别明显相似。观察到的死亡率风险差异可能归因于影响从复发到死亡的临床过程的与 ER 相关的因素。这些临床发现显然与两种不同类型的乳腺癌的发生相矛盾,尽管与 ERP 和 ERN 肿瘤相关的明显不同的流行病学、临床和分子特征,但 ER 水平可能有助于确定事件风险水平。