CB Defence and Environmental Health Centre, Centres for Biothreat Preparedness and Military Medicine, Helsinki, Finland.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jan;17(1):34-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03178.x.
Rapid detection is essential for timely initiation of medical post-exposure prophylactic measures in the event of intentional release of biological threat agents. We compared real-time PCR assay performance between the Applied Biosystems 7300/7500 and the RAZOR instruments for specific detection of the causative agents of anthrax, brucellosis, tularemia and plague. Furthermore, an assay detecting Bacillus thuringiensis, a Bacillus anthracis surrogate, was developed for field-training purposes. Assay sensitivities for B. anthracis, Brucella spp., Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis were 10-100 fg of target DNA per reaction, and no significant difference in assay performance was observed between the instrument platforms. Specificity testing of the diagnostic panels with both instrument platforms did not reveal any cross-reactivity with other closely related bacteria. The duration of thermocycling with the RAZOR instrument was shorter, i.e. 40 min as compared with 100 min for the Applied Biosystems 7300/7500 instruments. These assays provide rapid tools for the specific detection of four biological threat agents. The detection assays, as well as the training assay for B. thuringiensis powder preparation analysis, may be utilized under field conditions and for field training, respectively.
快速检测对于在发生生物威胁剂故意释放时及时启动医学接触后预防措施至关重要。我们比较了 Applied Biosystems 7300/7500 和 RAZOR 仪器在炭疽、布鲁氏菌病、兔热病和鼠疫病原体的特定检测中的实时 PCR 检测性能。此外,还开发了一种用于现场培训目的的检测苏云金芽孢杆菌(炭疽杆菌替代品)的检测方法。B. anthracis、Brucella spp.、Francisella tularensis 和 Yersinia pestis 的检测灵敏度为每个反应 10-100 fg 目标 DNA,两种仪器平台的检测性能没有明显差异。使用两种仪器平台对诊断面板进行特异性测试未发现与其他密切相关细菌的交叉反应。RAZOR 仪器的热循环时间更短,即 40 分钟,而 Applied Biosystems 7300/7500 仪器为 100 分钟。这些检测方法为四种生物威胁剂的特异性检测提供了快速工具。检测检测方法以及苏云金芽孢杆菌粉末制备分析的培训检测方法可分别在现场条件下和现场培训中使用。