文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

从复杂调查数据中估计模型调整后的风险、风险差异和风险比。

Estimating model-adjusted risks, risk differences, and risk ratios from complex survey data.

机构信息

Statistics and Epidemiology Unit, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2194, USA.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Mar 1;171(5):618-23. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp440. Epub 2010 Feb 4.


DOI:10.1093/aje/kwp440
PMID:20133516
Abstract

There is increasing interest in estimating and drawing inferences about risk or prevalence ratios and differences instead of odds ratios in the regression setting. Recent publications have shown how the GENMOD procedure in SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina) can be used to estimate these parameters in non-population-based studies. In this paper, the authors show how model-adjusted risks, risk differences, and risk ratio estimates can be obtained directly from logistic regression models in the complex sample survey setting to yield population-based inferences. Complex sample survey designs typically involve some combination of weighting, stratification, multistage sampling, clustering, and perhaps finite population adjustments. Point estimates of model-adjusted risks, risk differences, and risk ratios are obtained from average marginal predictions in the fitted logistic regression model. The model can contain both continuous and categorical covariates, as well as interaction terms. The authors use the SUDAAN software package (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina) to obtain point estimates, standard errors (via linearization or a replication method), confidence intervals, and P values for the parameters and contrasts of interest. Data from the 2006 National Health Interview Survey are used to illustrate these concepts.

摘要

人们越来越感兴趣的是在回归设置中估计和推断风险或流行率比和差异,而不是odds 比。最近的出版物展示了如何在非基于人群的研究中使用 SAS 中的 GENMOD 过程(SAS Institute Inc.,Cary,北卡罗来纳州)来估计这些参数。在本文中,作者展示了如何直接从复杂抽样调查设置中的逻辑回归模型中获得模型调整后的风险、风险差异和风险比估计值,从而得出基于人群的推论。复杂抽样调查设计通常涉及加权、分层、多阶段抽样、聚类,以及可能的有限人口调整的某种组合。模型调整后的风险、风险差异和风险比的点估计值是从拟合逻辑回归模型中的平均边际预测中获得的。该模型可以包含连续和分类协变量,以及交互项。作者使用 SUDAAN 软件包(Research Triangle Institute,Research Triangle Park,North Carolina)来获得感兴趣的参数和对比的点估计值、标准误差(通过线性化或复制方法)、置信区间和 P 值。使用 2006 年全国健康访谈调查的数据来说明这些概念。

相似文献

[1]
Estimating model-adjusted risks, risk differences, and risk ratios from complex survey data.

Am J Epidemiol. 2010-2-4

[2]
A set of SAS macros for calculating and displaying adjusted odds ratios (with confidence intervals) for continuous covariates in logistic B-spline regression models.

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008-10

[3]
[Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].

Epidemiol Prev. 2001

[4]
Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2007-9

[5]
Practical considerations in the analysis of complex sample survey data.

Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1999-10

[6]
Assessment of risks by predicting counterfactuals.

Stat Med. 2009-12-30

[7]
Standard errors for attributable risk for simple and complex sample designs.

Biometrics. 2005-9

[8]
Testing and estimating model-adjusted effect-measure modification using marginal structural models and complex survey data.

Am J Epidemiol. 2010-8-26

[9]
Inference for odds ratio regression models with sparse dependent data.

Biometrics. 1998-3

[10]
On modelling response propensity for dwelling unit (DU) level non-response adjustment in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).

Stat Med. 2007-4-15

引用本文的文献

[1]
Relative Excess Risk of Metabolic Syndrome Due to Interaction Between Handgrip Strength and Dietary Patterns Among Korean Youth.

Nutrients. 2025-7-10

[2]
Mental Health Symptoms and Receipt of Mental Health Care Among US Adults Diagnosed With Kidney Disease.

Prev Chronic Dis. 2025-7-3

[3]
Prevalence of and differences in participation restrictions among US cancer survivors.

Int J Cancer. 2025-6-30

[4]
Prescription Stimulant Use, Misuse, and Use Disorder Among US Adults Aged 18 to 64 Years.

JAMA Psychiatry. 2025-3-19

[5]
Racial and ethnic disparities in the perceived neighborhood walking environment and self-reported sleep health: A nationally representative sample of the United States.

Sleep Health. 2025-3-11

[6]
The impact of age at initial HPV vaccination on cervical cancer screening participation in a nationally representative cohort of women in the United States.

J Med Screen. 2025-9

[7]
Shiftwork and leisure-time physical inactivity (LTPI) among U.S. workers.

Chronobiol Int. 2025-1

[8]
Associations Between Health-Related Social Needs and Cardiovascular Health Among US Adults.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2024-12-3

[9]
Factors and reasons for planning to quit smoking among a nationally representative sample of adults who smoke: Findings from the 2021 ITC EUREST-PLUS Spain Survey.

Tob Prev Cessat. 2024-11-20

[10]
Self-assessed threshold for cold temperatures and thermal insulation of clothing among poultry workers.

Sci Rep. 2024-9-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索