Suppr超能文献

评估脊髓损伤运动员的人工汗液。

Evaluation of artificial sweat in athletes with spinal cord injuries.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Health Sciences, Central Washington University, 400 East University Way, Ellensburg, WA 98923, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 May;109(1):125-31. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1371-4. Epub 2010 Feb 5.

Abstract

Athletes with spinal cord injury often experience high heat storage due to reduced sweating capacity below the spinal injury. Spray bottle (SB) may be used to apply mist for evaporative cooling during breaks in competitions. This study examined the efficacy of SB during rest breaks. Seven participants, four female and three males, (mean +/- SD age 24 +/- 4.1 year, weight 56.2 +/- 7.0 kg, upper-body VO(2) peak 2.4 +/- 0.6 l/min) volunteered for the study. Participants were paraplegic athletes (T3-T12/L1) with both complete and incomplete lesions. Participants arm-cranked using a ramp protocol in an environment of 21 +/- 1.5 degrees C and 55 +/- 3% rh once using a SB during 1-min rest between 7-min stages of increasing intensity and once without the SB (CON). Mean total work was similar (p = 0.86) for the SB and CON (2495.7 +/- 914.6 vs. 2407.1 +/- 982.3 kJ, respectively). Likewise, the mean work times were similar between trials (27 +/- 6 and 26 +/- 7 min for SB and CON, respectively). Furthermore, there were no significant differences detected between trials for skin temperature, rectal temperature, esophageal temperature (p > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences detected between trials for RPE (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the application of artificial sweat via SB was ineffective in attenuating the onset of uncompensable heat strain during high-intensity arm exercise in a comfortable environment.

摘要

脊髓损伤运动员由于脊髓损伤以下的出汗能力降低,常常会经历高热储存。喷雾瓶(SB)可用于在比赛休息期间喷洒雾状以进行蒸发冷却。本研究检查了 SB 在休息期间的效果。七名参与者,四名女性和三名男性,(平均+/- SD 年龄 24+/-4.1 岁,体重 56.2+/-7.0 公斤,上半身 VO2 峰值 2.4+/-0.6 l/min)自愿参加了这项研究。参与者是截瘫运动员(T3-T12/L1),有完全和不完全的损伤。参与者在环境温度为 21+/-1.5 摄氏度和相对湿度为 55+/-3%的情况下,使用斜坡方案进行手臂曲柄运动,一次使用 SB 在 7 分钟的递增强度阶段之间的 1 分钟休息期间进行喷雾,一次不使用 SB(CON)。使用 SB 和 CON 的平均总工作量相似(p = 0.86)(分别为 2495.7+/-914.6 和 2407.1+/-982.3 kJ)。同样,两次试验之间的平均工作时间也相似(SB 和 CON 分别为 27+/-6 和 26+/-7 分钟)。此外,在两次试验之间,皮肤温度、直肠温度、食管温度均无显著差异(p > 0.05)。试验之间的 RPE 也没有统计学差异(p > 0.05)。总之,在舒适的环境中进行高强度手臂运动时,通过 SB 应用人造汗液对减轻不可补偿性热应激的发生没有效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验