Department of Psychology, Cognitive and Developmental Psychology, University of Zürich, Switzerland.
Dev Sci. 2010 Mar;13(2):320-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00881.x.
We investigated whether great apes, like human infants, monkeys and dogs, are subject to a strong gravity bias when tested with the tubes task, and--in case of mastery--what the source of competence on the tubes task is. We presented 22 apes with three versions of the tubes task, in which an object is dropped down a tube connected to one of three potential hiding places and the subject is required to locate the object. In two versions, apes were confronted with a causal tube that varied in the amount of perceptual information it provided (i.e. presence or absence of acoustic cues). The third version was a non-causal adaptation of the task in which a painted line 'connected' dropping and hiding places. Results indicate that apes neither have a reliable gravity bias when tested with the tubes, nor understand the causal function of the tube. Even though there is evidence that they can integrate tube-related causal information to localize the object, they seem to depend mainly on non-causal inferences when searching for an invisibly displaced object.
我们研究了大型猿类是否像人类婴儿、猴子和狗一样,在接受管任务测试时受到强烈的重力偏向,如果掌握了任务,那么掌握管任务的能力来源是什么。我们向 22 只猿类展示了三种版本的管任务,其中一个物体从连接到三个潜在隐藏地点之一的管中掉落,要求对象找到该物体。在两个版本中,猿类面临的是一个因果管,它在提供的感知信息数量上有所不同(即是否存在声音线索)。第三个版本是任务的非因果适应,其中一条画的线“连接”了掉落和隐藏的地方。结果表明,猿类在接受管任务测试时既没有可靠的重力偏向,也不理解管的因果作用。尽管有证据表明它们可以整合与管相关的因果信息来定位物体,但它们在寻找看不见的移动物体时似乎主要依赖于非因果推理。