Division of Rheumatology, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Ponte de Lima, Portugal.
Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Jun;29(6):629-35. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1380-z. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
This work was performed as part of the Portuguese participation in the 3E Initiative 2007-2008, dedicated to the use of methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatic conditions. Three questions raised by Portuguese rheumatologists and considered relevant to clinical practice remained out of the selection of a set of ten key questions formulated to further establish multinational recommendations on the use of MTX in rheumatic diseases. The authors collected and analyzed all the evidence available by using a systematic literature search methodology and selection criteria concerning the following issues in rheumatoid arthritis (RA): (1) the management of MTX after clinical remission; (2) the management of MTX during infections and (3) the screening and treatment of tuberculosis in patients on MTX treatment. A total of 1,862 references were identified, of which 163 were selected for detailed analysis and 12 included in the final review. The evidence was appraised according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (EBM) levels of evidence. Although with limited evidence, the authors concluded that: (1) extending the interval for MTX therapy may be a valid alternative regimen in a subset of RA patients in clinical remission (EBM level 2b); (2) MTX may be safe during some common infections in RA patients (EBM level 3b/4); (3) screening and treatment of TB in patients on MTX should be similar to the general population (EBM level 4). The evidence available to support clinical decisions in this area is very limited in number and quality. There is a need for further research and while that is unavailable, practical decisions have to rely on experience and expert opinion.
这项工作是葡萄牙参与 2007-2008 年 3E 倡议的一部分,致力于在风湿性疾病中使用甲氨蝶呤 (MTX)。葡萄牙风湿病学家提出的三个问题,被认为与临床实践相关,但未被纳入为进一步制定关于风湿性疾病中 MTX 使用的多国建议而选择的十项关键问题。作者使用系统文献检索方法收集和分析了所有可用证据,并根据类风湿关节炎 (RA) 中的以下问题制定了选择标准:(1) 临床缓解后 MTX 的管理;(2) 感染期间 MTX 的管理;(3) MTX 治疗患者的结核病筛查和治疗。共确定了 1862 篇参考文献,其中 163 篇被选为详细分析,12 篇被纳入最终综述。证据根据牛津循证医学中心 (EBM) 的证据水平进行评估。尽管证据有限,作者得出结论:(1) 在临床缓解的 RA 患者亚组中,延长 MTX 治疗间隔可能是一种有效的替代方案(EBM 级别 2b);(2) MTX 在 RA 患者的一些常见感染期间可能是安全的(EBM 级别 3b/4);(3) MTX 治疗患者的结核病筛查和治疗应与普通人群相似(EBM 级别 4)。在这一领域支持临床决策的证据数量和质量非常有限。需要进一步研究,在没有研究的情况下,实际决策必须依赖经验和专家意见。