Analysis Group Inc, Boston, MA 02199, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Apr;26(4):849-60. doi: 10.1185/03007991003613910.
The approaching availability of lower-cost generic angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may affect formulary policies for patients maintained on the ARB valsartan.
Estimate the economic impact of switching from valsartan (including valsartan-based single-pill combinations) to other ARBs without apparent medical reasons.
Patients with essential hypertension and at least 6 months of continuous valsartan treatment free of hospitalization, cardiovascular events, renal events or ARB-associated adverse events were identified from the MarketScan administrative claims database from January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2008. Those who subsequently switched to a different ARB with at least a 5% copayment decrease (switchers) were matched to those who did not switch (maintainers) according to propensity score quintiles and selected baseline characteristics. Refills were not required after the index fill for the switched-to ARB or maintained valsartan. Matched switchers and maintainers were compared in terms of medication discontinuation, healthcare resource use and costs during the 6 months following the index fill.
A total of 99,926 valsartan maintainers and 2150 switchers (with a mean copayment decrease of $16.5 per month) were identified and matched. After matching, switching from versus maintaining valsartan was associated with an 8% higher risk of medication discontinuation (p < 0.008), 19.1 additional outpatient visits/100 patients (p = 0.002) and 9.3 additional hypertension-related inpatient days/100 patients (p = 0.030). Concurrently, switching from versus maintaining valsartan was associated with higher total medical costs by $748/patient (p < 0.001), driven largely by higher costs for hypertension-related medical services by $492/patient (p = 0.004).
Exact reasons for switching were not available and the study assessed only the short-term impacts of switching.
Hypertension patients maintained on valsartan who switched to a different ARB with a lower copayment experienced substantial increases in medication discontinuation, healthcare resource use and costs compared to those who maintained valsartan treatment.
低成本仿制药血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)即将上市,可能会影响到将 ARB 缬沙坦用于患者的处方政策。
评估无明显医学原因从缬沙坦(包括缬沙坦复方单片制剂)换药至其他 ARB 的经济学影响。
从 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 3 月 31 日 MarketScan 行政索赔数据库中,确定了患有原发性高血压且至少连续 6 个月接受缬沙坦治疗且无住院、心血管事件、肾脏事件或 ARB 相关不良事件的患者。那些随后改用至少降低 5%共付额(换药者)的不同 ARB 的患者,根据倾向评分五分位数和选定的基线特征与未换药者(维持者)相匹配。在切换至 ARB 或维持缬沙坦的索引填充后,不再需要补充药物。在索引填充后的 6 个月内,比较换药者和维持者的药物停药、医疗资源使用和成本情况。
共确定了 99926 名缬沙坦维持者和 2150 名换药者(每月共付额平均降低 16.5 美元),并进行了匹配。匹配后,与维持缬沙坦相比,切换至其他 ARB 与药物停药风险增加 8%(p < 0.008)、每 100 名患者增加 19.1 次门诊就诊(p = 0.002)和每 100 名患者增加 9.3 天高血压相关住院天数(p = 0.030)相关。同时,与维持缬沙坦相比,切换至其他 ARB 还导致患者的总医疗费用增加 748 美元/人(p < 0.001),这主要是由于高血压相关医疗服务成本增加 492 美元/人(p = 0.004)所致。
无法得知确切的换药原因,研究仅评估了换药的短期影响。
与维持缬沙坦治疗相比,用较低共付额的其他 ARB 换药的高血压患者,在药物停药、医疗资源使用和成本方面经历了显著增加。