Suppr超能文献

基于患者和实践层面的结直肠癌筛查干预措施在医保参保人员中的效果:CHOICE 试验的设计和基线结果。

Effectiveness of a patient- and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: design and baseline findings of the CHOICE trial.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2010 Apr 1;116(7):1664-73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24962.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

: Evidence-based interventions have been found effective in increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Translating these successful interventions into real world settings, such as health plans, can be challenging.

METHODS

: CHOICE (Communicating Health Options through Information and Cancer Education) is a controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a patient- and practice-level intervention to increase use of recommended CRC screening tests. The patient-level intervention was a patient decision aid and stage-targeted brochures, mailed to eligible health plan members, to provide information about CRC, available screening tests, and how to obtain CRC screening at their physicians' practices. The practice-level intervention was academic detailing to prepare practices to facilitate CRC testing once the patient was activated by the decision aid. Surveys and claims data will be used to assess CRC screening test completion.

RESULTS

: Thirty-two primary care practices in Florida and Georgia participated. The authors recruited 443 participating health plan members for the trial; 211 were patients in intervention practices, and 232 were in usual care practices. Study participants reflected an insured population; the majority were white and aged <60 years. The authors also mailed the intervention to 343 people from intervention practices who did not respond to the eligibility or baseline survey. Receipt of screening in that group will be compared with screening among 319 people from usual care practices who did not respond to these surveys using claims data.

CONCLUSIONS

: The CHOICE study will demonstrate the effect of 2 combined evidence-based interventions on CRC screening test completion among health plan members. Cancer 2010. (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

循证干预措施已被证明可有效提高结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率。但将这些成功的干预措施转化到实际环境中,如医疗保健计划中,可能具有挑战性。

方法

CHOICE(通过信息和癌症教育传达健康选择)是一项对照试验,旨在测试患者和实践层面干预措施对提高推荐 CRC 筛查测试使用率的有效性。患者层面的干预措施是患者决策辅助工具和针对特定阶段的宣传册,寄给符合条件的医疗保健计划成员,以提供有关 CRC、可用筛查测试以及如何在医生诊所获得 CRC 筛查的信息。实践层面的干预措施是学术细化,以准备实践,以便在患者通过决策辅助工具被激活后促进 CRC 测试。将使用调查和索赔数据评估 CRC 筛查测试完成情况。

结果

佛罗里达州和佐治亚州的 32 家初级保健诊所参与了该研究。作者招募了 443 名参加试验的医疗保健计划成员;其中 211 名患者来自干预实践,232 名患者来自常规护理实践。研究参与者反映了一个参保人群;大多数是白人,年龄<60 岁。作者还向干预实践中未回复资格或基线调查的 343 人邮寄了干预措施。将使用索赔数据比较该组的筛查率与常规护理实践中未回复这些调查的 319 人的筛查率。

结论

CHOICE 研究将展示 2 种综合循证干预措施对医疗保健计划成员 CRC 筛查测试完成情况的影响。癌症 2010. (c)2010 年美国癌症协会。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Multilevel interventions: measurement and measures.多层次干预措施:测量与方法
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 May;2012(44):67-77. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs011.

本文引用的文献

4
Effects of colon cancer risk counseling for first-degree relatives.对一级亲属进行结肠癌风险咨询的效果。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jul;16(7):1485-91. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0914.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验