• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于患者和实践层面的结直肠癌筛查干预措施在医保参保人员中的效果:CHOICE 试验的设计和基线结果。

Effectiveness of a patient- and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: design and baseline findings of the CHOICE trial.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2010 Apr 1;116(7):1664-73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24962.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.24962
PMID:20143439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2938956/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

: Evidence-based interventions have been found effective in increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Translating these successful interventions into real world settings, such as health plans, can be challenging.

METHODS

: CHOICE (Communicating Health Options through Information and Cancer Education) is a controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a patient- and practice-level intervention to increase use of recommended CRC screening tests. The patient-level intervention was a patient decision aid and stage-targeted brochures, mailed to eligible health plan members, to provide information about CRC, available screening tests, and how to obtain CRC screening at their physicians' practices. The practice-level intervention was academic detailing to prepare practices to facilitate CRC testing once the patient was activated by the decision aid. Surveys and claims data will be used to assess CRC screening test completion.

RESULTS

: Thirty-two primary care practices in Florida and Georgia participated. The authors recruited 443 participating health plan members for the trial; 211 were patients in intervention practices, and 232 were in usual care practices. Study participants reflected an insured population; the majority were white and aged <60 years. The authors also mailed the intervention to 343 people from intervention practices who did not respond to the eligibility or baseline survey. Receipt of screening in that group will be compared with screening among 319 people from usual care practices who did not respond to these surveys using claims data.

CONCLUSIONS

: The CHOICE study will demonstrate the effect of 2 combined evidence-based interventions on CRC screening test completion among health plan members. Cancer 2010. (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

循证干预措施已被证明可有效提高结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率。但将这些成功的干预措施转化到实际环境中,如医疗保健计划中,可能具有挑战性。

方法

CHOICE(通过信息和癌症教育传达健康选择)是一项对照试验,旨在测试患者和实践层面干预措施对提高推荐 CRC 筛查测试使用率的有效性。患者层面的干预措施是患者决策辅助工具和针对特定阶段的宣传册,寄给符合条件的医疗保健计划成员,以提供有关 CRC、可用筛查测试以及如何在医生诊所获得 CRC 筛查的信息。实践层面的干预措施是学术细化,以准备实践,以便在患者通过决策辅助工具被激活后促进 CRC 测试。将使用调查和索赔数据评估 CRC 筛查测试完成情况。

结果

佛罗里达州和佐治亚州的 32 家初级保健诊所参与了该研究。作者招募了 443 名参加试验的医疗保健计划成员;其中 211 名患者来自干预实践,232 名患者来自常规护理实践。研究参与者反映了一个参保人群;大多数是白人,年龄<60 岁。作者还向干预实践中未回复资格或基线调查的 343 人邮寄了干预措施。将使用索赔数据比较该组的筛查率与常规护理实践中未回复这些调查的 319 人的筛查率。

结论

CHOICE 研究将展示 2 种综合循证干预措施对医疗保健计划成员 CRC 筛查测试完成情况的影响。癌症 2010. (c)2010 年美国癌症协会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8241/2938956/0e05b47a87d2/nihms-230621-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8241/2938956/0e05b47a87d2/nihms-230621-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8241/2938956/0e05b47a87d2/nihms-230621-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a patient- and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: design and baseline findings of the CHOICE trial.基于患者和实践层面的结直肠癌筛查干预措施在医保参保人员中的效果:CHOICE 试验的设计和基线结果。
Cancer. 2010 Apr 1;116(7):1664-73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24962.
2
Effectiveness of a patient and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: the CHOICE trial.在健康计划成员中实施患者和实践层面结直肠癌筛查干预的效果:CHOICE 试验。
Cancer. 2011 Aug 1;117(15):3352-62. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25924. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
3
Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较决策辅助工具加患者导航与常规护理对弱势群体结直肠癌筛查完成情况的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Jul 8;15:275. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-275.
4
Colorectal cancer screening in primary care: translating research into practice.基层医疗中的结直肠癌筛查:将研究转化为实践。
Med Care. 2010 Oct;48(10):900-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ec5591.
5
Effect of Combined Patient Decision Aid and Patient Navigation vs Usual Care for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Vulnerable Patient Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.联合患者决策辅助工具与患者导航服务对比常规护理对弱势患者群体进行结直肠癌筛查的效果:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):967-974. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1294.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of offering postvisit decision support and assistance in obtaining physician-recommended colorectal cancer screening: the e-assist: Colon Health study-a protocol study.随机试验评估提供就诊后决策支持和帮助获得医生推荐的结直肠癌筛查的有效性和影响:e-辅助:结肠健康研究-方案研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 7;9(1):e023986. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023986.
8
Mailed Outreach and Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.针对农村医疗补助计划参保者的结直肠癌筛查邮件外展与患者导航服务:一项整群随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0928.
9
Implementing Mailed Colorectal Cancer Fecal Screening Tests in Real-World Primary Care Settings: Promising Implementation Practices and Opportunities for Improvement.在真实初级保健环境中实施邮寄结直肠癌粪便筛查检测:有前景的实施实践和改进机会。
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):124-135. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01496-3. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
10
Shared Decision-Making in Colorectal Cancer Screening for Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.老年人结直肠癌筛查中的共同决策:一项集群随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2429645. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29645.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision-making interventions in neuro-oncology practice: a systematic review.神经肿瘤学实践中的共同决策干预措施:一项系统综述。
J Neurooncol. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-05141-7.
2
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
3
Improvement of participation rate in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by training general practitioners in motivational interviewing (AmDepCCR).

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal cancer test use from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.2005年美国国家健康访谈调查中的结直肠癌检测使用情况。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jul;17(7):1623-30. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2838.
2
Use of colorectal cancer tests--United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006.2002年、2004年及2006年美国结直肠癌检测的使用情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008 Mar 14;57(10):253-8.
3
Value of patient time invested in the colonoscopy screening process: time requirements for colonoscopy study.患者投入结肠镜检查筛查过程中的时间价值:结肠镜检查研究的时间要求
通过培训普通科医生进行动机性访谈(AmDepCCR)来提高结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的参与率。
Trials. 2022 Feb 14;23(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06056-8.
4
Effects of a Community-to-Clinic Navigation Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Underserved People.社区到诊所导航干预对弱势群体结直肠癌筛查的影响。
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Apr 20;54(5):308-319. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz049.
5
A Review of Decision Aids for Patients Considering More Than One Type of Invasive Treatment.考虑多种侵袭性治疗的患者的决策辅助工具综述。
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:350-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
7
Randomized controlled dissemination study of community-to-clinic navigation to promote CRC screening: Study design and implications.社区到诊所引导促进结直肠癌筛查的随机对照传播研究:研究设计与启示
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;53:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
8
Implementation and spread of interventions into the multilevel context of routine practice and policy: implications for the cancer care continuum.干预措施在常规实践和政策的多层次背景下的实施与推广:对癌症护理连续统一体的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 May;2012(44):86-99. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs004.
9
Multilevel interventions: measurement and measures.多层次干预措施:测量与方法
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 May;2012(44):67-77. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs011.
10
Nonparticipation in a population-based trial to increase colorectal cancer screening.不参与基于人群的提高结直肠癌筛查的试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.11.014.
Med Decis Making. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):56-65. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07309643.
4
Effects of colon cancer risk counseling for first-degree relatives.对一级亲属进行结肠癌风险咨询的效果。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jul;16(7):1485-91. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0914.
5
Development and initial testing of a computer-based patient decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening for primary care practice.一种用于促进初级保健实践中结直肠癌筛查的基于计算机的患者决策辅助工具的开发与初步测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 Nov 28;5:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-36.
6
Academic detailing to improve antihypertensive prescribing patterns.学术推广以改善抗高血压药物的处方模式。
Am J Hypertens. 2003 Jun;16(6):508-11. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(03)00060-8.
7
An academic detailing intervention to disseminate physician-delivered smoking cessation counseling: smoking cessation outcomes of the Physicians Counseling Smokers Project.一项传播医生提供的戒烟咨询的学术推广干预措施:医生咨询吸烟者项目的戒烟成果。
Prev Med. 2003 Feb;36(2):185-96. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00018-x.
8
Academic detailing to improve use of broad-spectrum antibiotics at an academic medical center.在一所学术医疗中心开展学术推广活动以改善广谱抗生素的使用情况。
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(15):1897-902. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.15.1897.
9
Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial.基于录像带的结肠癌筛查决策辅助工具。一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Nov 21;133(10):761-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-10-200011210-00008.
10
An office systems approach to cancer prevention in primary care.基层医疗中癌症预防的办公系统方法。
Cancer Pract. 1997 Nov-Dec;5(6):375-81.