Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Apr-Jun;14(2):250-8. doi: 10.3109/10903120903572327.
The American Heart Association's (AHA's) Advanced Cardiac Life Support guidelines act as the national standards for termination of resuscitation (TOR) in cases of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, local emergency medical services (EMS) implementation of these guidelines has been nonuniform.
To identify the operational issues within local EMS systems that may serve as barriers or facilitators to full acceptance of national guidelines for prehospital TOR in appropriate circumstances. Methods. We conducted three focus groups at the January 2008 National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) annual meeting. Snowball sampling was used to recruit 19 physicians, two EMS providers, one research director, one nurse, and one medical student attending the conference. Two reviewers analyzed the data in an iterative process to identify recurrent and unifying themes.
We identified three distinct stakeholder groups whose current beliefs and practices may influence local implementation of TOR: EMS providers with variations in education and work culture; EMS medical directors with responsibility but little authority; and online medical control physicians who do not communicate effectively with the other groups. Our focus group participants suggested that national organizations, such as the AHA and the American College of Emergency Physicians, may serve a role in overcoming the overarching barriers of communication, standardized educational requirements, and coordination of local services.
We have identified operational barriers that may impede implementation of TOR guidelines. Three influential stakeholder groups will need to work with national organizations to overcome these local barriers.
美国心脏协会(AHA)的高级心脏生命支持指南是在难治性院外心脏骤停的情况下终止复苏(TOR)的国家标准。然而,当地紧急医疗服务(EMS)对这些指南的实施并不统一。
确定当地 EMS 系统中的操作问题,这些问题可能成为在适当情况下全面接受国家院前 TOR 指南的障碍或促进因素。方法。我们在 2008 年 1 月的国家急救医师协会(NAEMSP)年会上进行了三次焦点小组讨论。采用滚雪球抽样法招募了 19 名医生、2 名 EMS 提供者、1 名研究主任、1 名护士和 1 名参加会议的医学生。两名审查员以迭代方式分析数据,以确定反复出现的统一主题。
我们确定了三个不同的利益相关者群体,他们目前的信念和做法可能会影响 TOR 的当地实施:教育和工作文化存在差异的 EMS 提供者;对服务负责但几乎没有权威的 EMS 医疗主任;以及与其他群体沟通效果不佳的在线医疗控制医生。我们的焦点小组参与者建议,美国心脏协会和美国急诊医师学院等国家组织可能在克服沟通、标准化教育要求和协调当地服务等首要障碍方面发挥作用。
我们已经确定了可能阻碍 TOR 指南实施的操作障碍。三个有影响力的利益相关者群体将需要与国家组织合作,克服这些地方障碍。