• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展和评估一种针对经历糖尿病的儿童和青少年的心理社会干预措施(DEPICTED):一项针对与 1 型糖尿病青少年一起工作的医疗保健专业人员进行沟通技巧培训计划有效性的群组随机对照试验的方案。

Development and Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention for Children and Teenagers Experiencing Diabetes (DEPICTED): a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of a communication skills training programme for healthcare professionals working with young people with type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

South East Wales Trials Unit, Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 7th floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb 9;10:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-36.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-10-36
PMID:20144218
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2829553/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is the third most common chronic condition in childhood and poor glycaemic control leads to serious short-term and life-limiting long-term complications. In addition to optimal medical management, it is widely recognised that psychosocial and educational factors play a key role in improving outcomes for young people with diabetes. Recent systematic reviews of psycho-educational interventions recognise the need for new methods to be developed in consultation with key stakeholders including patients, their families and the multidisciplinary diabetes healthcare team.

METHODS/DESIGN: Following a development phase involving key stakeholders, a psychosocial intervention for use by paediatric diabetes staff and not requiring input from trained psychologists has been developed, incorporating a communication skills training programme for health professionals and a shared agenda-setting tool. The effectiveness of the intervention will be evaluated in a cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT). The primary outcome, to be measured in children aged 4-15 years diagnosed with type 1 diabetes for at least one year, is the effect on glycaemic control (HbA1c) during the year after training of the healthcare team is completed. Secondary outcomes include quality of life for patients and carers and cost-effectiveness. Patient and carer preferences for service delivery will also be assessed. Twenty-six paediatric diabetes teams are participating in the trial, recruiting a total of 700 patients for evaluation of outcome measures. Half the participating teams will be randomised to receive the intervention at the beginning of the trial and remaining centres offered the training package at the end of the one year trial period.

DISCUSSION

The primary aim of the trial is to determine whether a communication skills training intervention for specialist paediatric diabetes teams will improve clinical and psychological outcomes for young people with type 1 diabetes. Previous research indicates the effectiveness of specialist psychological interventions in achieving sustained improvements in glycaemic control. This trial will evaluate an intervention which does not require the involvement of trained psychologists, maximising the potential feasibility of delivery in a wider NHS context.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN61568050.

摘要

背景

糖尿病是儿童期第三大常见慢性疾病,血糖控制不佳会导致严重的短期和危及生命的长期并发症。除了最佳的医疗管理外,广泛认为心理社会和教育因素在改善糖尿病青少年的治疗效果方面发挥着关键作用。最近对心理教育干预措施的系统评价认识到需要与包括患者、他们的家人和多学科糖尿病医疗团队在内的主要利益相关者协商制定新方法。

方法/设计:在涉及主要利益相关者的发展阶段之后,开发了一种用于儿科糖尿病工作人员的心理社会干预措施,该措施不需要经过培训的心理学家的投入,包括针对卫生专业人员的沟通技巧培训计划和共享的议程设置工具。该干预措施的有效性将在一项群组随机对照试验 (RCT) 中进行评估。主要结局指标为经过培训的医疗团队完成后的一年内,评估至少患有 1 年 1 型糖尿病的 4-15 岁儿童的血糖控制(HbA1c)的影响。次要结局指标包括患者和照顾者的生活质量和成本效益。还将评估患者和照顾者对服务交付的偏好。26 个儿科糖尿病团队参与了该试验,共招募了 700 名患者评估结局指标。参与试验的一半团队将在试验开始时随机接受干预,其余中心在为期一年的试验结束时提供培训包。

讨论

试验的主要目的是确定针对专科儿科糖尿病团队的沟通技巧培训干预措施是否会改善 1 型糖尿病青少年的临床和心理结局。以前的研究表明,专门的心理干预措施在实现血糖控制的持续改善方面是有效的。本试验将评估一种不需要训练有素的心理学家参与的干预措施,最大限度地提高在更广泛的英国国家医疗服务体系背景下实施的可行性。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN61568050。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cfb/2829553/71d27171f4be/1472-6963-10-36-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cfb/2829553/71d27171f4be/1472-6963-10-36-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cfb/2829553/71d27171f4be/1472-6963-10-36-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention for Children and Teenagers Experiencing Diabetes (DEPICTED): a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of a communication skills training programme for healthcare professionals working with young people with type 1 diabetes.发展和评估一种针对经历糖尿病的儿童和青少年的心理社会干预措施(DEPICTED):一项针对与 1 型糖尿病青少年一起工作的医疗保健专业人员进行沟通技巧培训计划有效性的群组随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb 9;10:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-36.
2
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
3
Development and evaluation by a cluster randomised trial of a psychosocial intervention in children and teenagers experiencing diabetes: the DEPICTED study.通过群组随机试验开发和评估针对糖尿病患儿和青少年的心理社会干预措施:DEPICTED 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Aug;15(29):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta15290.
4
The effect of the Talking Diabetes consulting skills intervention on glycaemic control and quality of life in children with type 1 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial (DEPICTED study).“Talking Diabetes”咨询技能干预对 1 型糖尿病儿童血糖控制和生活质量的影响: 聚类随机对照试验(DEPICTED 研究)。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 26;344:e2359. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2359.
5
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
6
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
7
Maximising engagement, motivation and long term change in a Structured Intensive Education Programme in Diabetes for children, young people and their families: Child and Adolescent Structured Competencies Approach to Diabetes Education (CASCADE).最大化参与度、激发动机并实现儿童、青少年及其家庭的糖尿病结构化强化教育计划的长期改变:儿童和青少年结构化糖尿病教育能力方法(CASCADE)。
BMC Pediatr. 2009 Sep 15;9:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-57.
8
The impact of an intervention to increase uptake to structured self-management education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care (the embedding package), compared to usual care, on glycaemic control: study protocol for a mixed methods study incorporating a wait-list cluster randomised controlled trial.一项旨在提高 2 型糖尿病患者在基层医疗中接受结构化自我管理教育的干预措施(嵌入方案)的影响,与常规护理相比,对血糖控制的影响:一项混合方法研究的研究方案,包括等待名单聚类随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 7;20(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1038-0.
9
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
10
Guided self-determination-young versus standard care in the treatment of young females with type 1 diabetes: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial.引导式自主抉择——1型糖尿病年轻女性患者治疗中青少年组与标准治疗组的对比:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Nov 24;18(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2296-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The renal resistive index as a new complementary tool to predict microvascular diabetic complications in children and adolescents: a groundbreaking finding.肾阻力指数作为预测儿童和青少年微血管糖尿病并发症的一种新的辅助工具:一项开创性的发现。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(17):422. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.08.65.
2
Clinical study on cluster care to prevent multi-drug resistant infection in ICU patients with severe encephalopathy.集束化护理预防重症脑病ICU患者多重耐药菌感染的临床研究
Exp Ther Med. 2016 Dec;12(6):3948-3950. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3876. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
3
An online tool for obesity intervention and public health.

本文引用的文献

1
Communication skills of healthcare professionals in paediatric diabetes services.儿科糖尿病服务中医疗保健专业人员的沟通技巧。
Diabet Med. 2009 May;26(5):502-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02708.x.
2
Balance algorithm for cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验的平衡算法
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Oct 9;8:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-65.
3
A multicenter randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing in teenagers with diabetes.一项针对青少年糖尿病患者的动机性访谈多中心随机对照试验。
一种用于肥胖干预和公共卫生的在线工具。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 10;16:136. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2797-3.
4
Diabetes Distress Among Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: a Systematic Review.1型糖尿病青少年的糖尿病困扰:一项系统综述
Curr Diab Rep. 2016 Jan;16(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0694-2.
5
A Mobile Health Intervention for Self-Management and Lifestyle Change for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes, Part 2: One-Year Results From the Norwegian Randomized Controlled Trial RENEWING HEALTH.移动健康干预对 2 型糖尿病患者的自我管理和生活方式改变,第 2 部分:挪威随机对照试验 RENEWING HEALTH 的一年结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Dec 11;2(4):e57. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3882.
6
A Low-Intensity Mobile Health Intervention With and Without Health Counseling for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes, Part 1: Baseline and Short-Term Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in the Norwegian Part of RENEWING HEALTH.一项针对 2 型糖尿病患者的低强度移动健康干预措施,联合和不联合健康咨询:RENEWING HEALTH 挪威部分的一项随机对照试验的基线和短期结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Dec 11;2(4):e52. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3535.
7
Low-intensity self-management intervention for persons with type 2 diabetes using a mobile phone-based diabetes diary, with and without health counseling and motivational interviewing: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.使用基于手机的糖尿病日记对2型糖尿病患者进行低强度自我管理干预,有无健康咨询和动机性访谈:一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2013 Aug 26;2(2):e34. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2768.
8
The potential for motivational interviewing to improve outcomes in the management of diabetes and obesity in paediatric and adult populations: a clinical review.动机性访谈在改善儿科和成人糖尿病和肥胖管理结局中的潜力:临床综述。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 May;16(5):381-7. doi: 10.1111/dom.12195. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
9
The effect of the Talking Diabetes consulting skills intervention on glycaemic control and quality of life in children with type 1 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial (DEPICTED study).“Talking Diabetes”咨询技能干预对 1 型糖尿病儿童血糖控制和生活质量的影响: 聚类随机对照试验(DEPICTED 研究)。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 26;344:e2359. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2359.
10
Evidence into practice: evaluating a child-centred intervention for diabetes medicine management. The EPIC Project.实践证据:评估以儿童为中心的糖尿病药物管理干预措施。EPIC 项目。
BMC Pediatr. 2010 Sep 27;10:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-70.
Diabetes Care. 2007 Jun;30(6):1390-5. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2260. Epub 2007 Mar 10.
4
Psycho-educational interventions for children and young people with Type 1 diabetes.针对1型糖尿病儿童和青少年的心理教育干预措施。
Diabet Med. 2006 Sep;23(9):935-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01816.x.
5
Effects of brief counselling among male heavy drinkers identified on general hospital wards.综合医院病房中确诊的男性重度饮酒者接受简短咨询的效果。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 1996 Mar;15(1):29-38. doi: 10.1080/09595239600185641.
6
The Diabetes Continuity of Care Scale: the development and initial evaluation of a questionnaire that measures continuity of care from the patient perspective.糖尿病连续性照护量表:一份从患者角度衡量照护连续性的问卷的开发与初步评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2004 Nov;12(6):475-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00517.x.
7
Measuring adaptations of motivational interviewing: the development and validation of the behavior change counseling index (BECCI).衡量动机性访谈的适应性:行为改变咨询指数(BECCI)的开发与验证
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Feb;56(2):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.01.003.
8
The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial.单次动机性访谈对减少年轻人药物使用及药物相关风险和危害认知的效果:一项多中心整群随机试验的结果
Addiction. 2004 Jan;99(1):39-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00564.x.
9
Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals.整群随机试验的偏倚风险证据:对发表在三本综合医学期刊上的近期试验的综述
BMJ. 2003 Oct 4;327(7418):785-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7418.785.
10
Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes.动机性访谈期间的来访者承诺性语言可预测药物使用结果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Oct;71(5):862-78. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.862.