Swedish Museum of Natural History, Entomology Department, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Zool. 2010 Jan 18;7:2. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-7-2.
The insecticides dichlorvos, paradichlorobenzene and naphthalene have been commonly used to eradicate pest insects from natural history collections. However, it is not known how these chemicals affect the DNA of the specimens in the collections. We thus tested the effect of dichlorvos, paradichlorobenzene and naphthalene on DNA of insects (Musca domestica) by extracting and amplifying DNA from specimens exposed to insecticides in two different concentrations over increasing time intervals.
The results clearly show that dichlorvos impedes both extraction and amplification of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA after relatively short time, whereas paradichlorobenzene and naphthalene do not.
Collections treated with paradichlorobenzene and naphthalene, are better preserved concerning DNA, than those treated with dichlorvos. Non toxic pest control methods should, however, be preferred due to physical damage of specimens and putative health risks by chemicals.
敌敌畏、对二氯苯和萘等杀虫剂常用于从自然历史藏品中消灭害虫。然而,目前尚不清楚这些化学物质会如何影响藏品中的标本的 DNA。因此,我们通过从暴露于两种不同浓度的杀虫剂中的标本中提取和扩增 DNA,测试了敌敌畏、对二氯苯和萘对昆虫(家蝇)DNA 的影响。
结果清楚地表明,敌敌畏在相对较短的时间内既妨碍了线粒体和核 DNA 的提取,也妨碍了其扩增,而对二氯苯和萘则没有。
用对二氯苯和萘处理的藏品在 DNA 方面保存得更好,而用敌敌畏处理的藏品则不然。然而,由于标本的物理损伤和化学物质可能带来的健康风险,应优先采用无毒的害虫防治方法。