Suppr超能文献

敌敌畏暴露会阻碍博物馆藏品中昆虫 DNA 的提取和扩增。

Dichlorvos exposure impedes extraction and amplification of DNA from insects in museum collections.

机构信息

Swedish Museum of Natural History, Entomology Department, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Zool. 2010 Jan 18;7:2. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-7-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The insecticides dichlorvos, paradichlorobenzene and naphthalene have been commonly used to eradicate pest insects from natural history collections. However, it is not known how these chemicals affect the DNA of the specimens in the collections. We thus tested the effect of dichlorvos, paradichlorobenzene and naphthalene on DNA of insects (Musca domestica) by extracting and amplifying DNA from specimens exposed to insecticides in two different concentrations over increasing time intervals.

RESULTS

The results clearly show that dichlorvos impedes both extraction and amplification of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA after relatively short time, whereas paradichlorobenzene and naphthalene do not.

CONCLUSION

Collections treated with paradichlorobenzene and naphthalene, are better preserved concerning DNA, than those treated with dichlorvos. Non toxic pest control methods should, however, be preferred due to physical damage of specimens and putative health risks by chemicals.

摘要

背景

敌敌畏、对二氯苯和萘等杀虫剂常用于从自然历史藏品中消灭害虫。然而,目前尚不清楚这些化学物质会如何影响藏品中的标本的 DNA。因此,我们通过从暴露于两种不同浓度的杀虫剂中的标本中提取和扩增 DNA,测试了敌敌畏、对二氯苯和萘对昆虫(家蝇)DNA 的影响。

结果

结果清楚地表明,敌敌畏在相对较短的时间内既妨碍了线粒体和核 DNA 的提取,也妨碍了其扩增,而对二氯苯和萘则没有。

结论

用对二氯苯和萘处理的藏品在 DNA 方面保存得更好,而用敌敌畏处理的藏品则不然。然而,由于标本的物理损伤和化学物质可能带来的健康风险,应优先采用无毒的害虫防治方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/774b/2819063/d3e21e469258/1742-9994-7-2-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验