• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[侵入性操作过程中家长会在场吗?对32家西班牙医院的评估]

[Are parents present during invasive procedures? Assessment in 32 Spanish hospitals].

作者信息

Gamell Fullà A, Corniero Alonso P, Parra Cotanda C, Trenchs Sainz de la Maza V, Luaces Cubells C

机构信息

Hospital Universitario de Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, España.

出版信息

An Pediatr (Barc). 2010 Apr;72(4):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2009.11.014. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.anpedi.2009.11.014
PMID:20149769
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Parental participation in medical decisions involving their children is essential and family presence during invasive procedures (IP) is fundamental.

OBJECTIVES

  1. To determine the frequency of parental presence during different IP in Spanish Paediatrics Emergency Departments (PED). 2) To assess the reasons for restricting parental presence. 3) To evaluate the agreement of health care professionals with regards to parental presence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Descriptive multicentre study based on questionnaires sent to physicians in charge of different Spanish PED.

RESULTS

Thirty-two out of 43 questionnaires were replied. Family presence during IP is never allowed in 11 hospitals. In the rest, this varies depending on the type of IP: blood sampling (15 hospitals), wound suture (14), urethral catheterization (9), lumbar puncture (7), intubation (1) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (1), with no significant differences between hospitals. The main arguments for restricting parental presence are parental anxiety (26/30) and a lower performance by health personnel (23/30). Occasional problems, such as nausea (22/28), have arisen due to family presence. The interviewed physicians in charge think that health care professionals' agreement rates for parental presence decrease significantly with the increasing invasiveness of the procedure. Two hospitals have a working group and one a specific protocol to address parental presence.

CONCLUSIONS

Parental presence during IP is limited in Spanish PED, due to parental anxiety and is detrimental to the success of the procedure. Physicians and nurses disagree with family presence, especially during the most invasive procedures.

摘要

引言

父母参与涉及子女的医疗决策至关重要,侵入性操作(IP)期间家人在场是基本要求。

目的

1)确定西班牙儿科急诊科(PED)不同侵入性操作期间父母在场的频率。2)评估限制父母在场的原因。3)评估医护人员对父母在场的认同情况。

材料与方法

基于向西班牙不同PED的主管医生发放问卷进行描述性多中心研究。

结果

43份问卷中有32份得到回复。11家医院从不允许侵入性操作期间家人在场。在其他医院,这因侵入性操作类型而异:采血(15家医院)、伤口缝合(14家)、尿道插管(9家)、腰椎穿刺(7家)、插管(1家)和心肺复苏(1家),各医院之间无显著差异。限制父母在场的主要理由是父母焦虑(26/30)和医护人员操作表现降低(23/30)。因家人在场偶尔出现一些问题,如恶心(22/28)。接受访谈的主管医生认为,随着操作侵入性增加,医护人员对父母在场的认同率显著降低。两家医院有一个工作组,一家有专门的方案来处理父母在场的问题。

结论

在西班牙儿科急诊科,侵入性操作期间父母在场受限,原因是父母焦虑且不利于操作的成功进行。医生和护士不同意家人在场,尤其是在侵入性最强的操作期间。

相似文献

1
[Are parents present during invasive procedures? Assessment in 32 Spanish hospitals].[侵入性操作过程中家长会在场吗?对32家西班牙医院的评估]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2010 Apr;72(4):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2009.11.014. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
2
Parental presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation: attitudes of health care professionals in Turkey.侵入性操作和复苏过程中家长在场情况:土耳其医护人员的态度
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Apr;22(4):230-4. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000210178.86504.80.
3
Parental presence during invasive procedures in a Spanish pediatric emergency department: incidence, perspectives, and related anxiety.家长在西班牙儿科急诊侵入性操作过程中的存在情况:发生率、观点和相关焦虑。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(4):202-7. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834490dc.
4
[Presence of parents in the emergency room during invasive procedures: do they prefer to be present?].[侵入性操作期间家长在急诊室的情况:他们更愿意在场吗?]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2009 Mar;70(3):230-4. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2008.10.017. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
5
Parents and procedures: a randomized controlled trial.父母与程序:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 1996 Nov;98(5):861-7.
6
Witnessing invasive paediatric procedures, including resuscitation, in the emergency department: a parental perspective.从家长视角看在急诊科目睹侵入性儿科操作,包括复苏
Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Jun;17(3):244-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00730.x.
7
[Parental presence during invasive procedures in the emergency department].[急诊科侵入性操作期间家长在场情况]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2009 Mar;70(3):293-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
8
Parental presence during invasive procedures in children: what is the physician's perspective?儿童侵入性操作过程中家长在场:医生的观点是什么?
South Med J. 2003 Sep;96(9):884-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000087283.17069.98.
9
Change in parental reasons for use of an urban pediatric emergency department in the past decade.过去十年间城市儿科急诊科家长就诊原因的变化。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Mar;26(3):181-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181d1dfc7.
10
[Has the presence of parents during invasive procedures in the emergency department increased in the last few years?].[近年来,急诊科侵入性操作过程中家长在场的情况有所增加吗?]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2015 Jan;82(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental presence during invasive pediatric procedures: what does it depend on?家长在小儿有创性操作中的陪伴:取决于什么?
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2023 Jan-Dec;31:e3828. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6101.3828.
2
[Presence of relatives during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Perspectives of health professionals, patients and family in the Basque Country].[心肺复苏期间亲属的在场情况:巴斯克地区医疗专业人员、患者及家属的观点]
Aten Primaria. 2019 May;51(5):269-277. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.12.002. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
3
Family presence during resuscitation: A Canadian Critical Care Society position paper.
复苏期间家属在场:加拿大重症监护学会立场文件。
Can Respir J. 2015 Jul-Aug;22(4):201-5. doi: 10.1155/2015/532721. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
4
Family-centred care for hospitalised children aged 0-12 years.以家庭为中心的0至12岁住院儿童护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004811. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004811.pub3.