• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家长在西班牙儿科急诊侵入性操作过程中的存在情况:发生率、观点和相关焦虑。

Parental presence during invasive procedures in a Spanish pediatric emergency department: incidence, perspectives, and related anxiety.

机构信息

Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Passeig Sant Joan de Déu 2, Esplugues, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(4):202-7. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834490dc.

DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834490dc
PMID:21346581
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Family presence during invasive procedures (IPs) is infrequent in Spanish pediatric emergency departments (PEDs), despite the benefits of family presence.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the proportion of relatives who wish to be present during IP, to determine the percentage of relatives who stayed during IP in our PED, and to evaluate parental anxiety.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was carried out in a PED of an urban, tertiary-care university-affiliated hospital in Barcelona (Spain). A written survey was given to the relatives of children who were admitted to the PED during the month of November 2009.

RESULTS

Of the 365 given questionnaires, 213 (58.4%) were completed. Ninety-nine percent of surveys were answered by the parents. Mean age of respondents was 37 years (74.6% were women). IPs were performed on 73.3% of patients, and 97.4% of IPs were performed in the presence of relatives. Parents were present during blood sampling (98%), urethral catheterizations (97%), lumbar punctures (LP; 72%), simple wound repair (62%), and fracture reductions (37%). Parents wanted to stay during blood sampling (98%), urethral catheterization (89.9%), LP (82.4%), simple wound repair (88.6%), and fracture reduction (86.5%). Respondents (51.6%) believed that parents should decide on their own whether their presence was desirable. Parents were least anxious during blood sampling and were most nervous during LP.

CONCLUSION

Most of the parents wish to stay beside their children during IPs. In our PED, parents were present for more than 95% of IPs. The more invasive the procedure is, the more anxious parents feel.

摘要

背景

在西班牙儿科急诊部门(PED),尽管家属在场有诸多益处,但在侵入性操作(IP)中家属在场的情况却很少见。

目的

调查希望在 IP 中在场的亲属比例,确定在我们的 PED 中 IP 期间在场的亲属比例,并评估父母的焦虑程度。

方法

在巴塞罗那(西班牙)的一家城市、三级保健大学附属医院的 PED 中进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。在 2009 年 11 月期间,向入住 PED 的儿童的亲属发放了一份书面调查问卷。

结果

在发放的 365 份问卷中,有 213 份(58.4%)完成了调查。99%的调查是由父母回答的。受访者的平均年龄为 37 岁(74.6%为女性)。对 73.3%的患者进行了 IP,97.4%的 IP 是在亲属在场的情况下进行的。父母在场的情况为:采血(98%)、尿道插管(97%)、腰椎穿刺(LP;72%)、简单伤口修复(62%)和骨折复位(37%)。父母希望在采血(98%)、尿道插管(89.9%)、LP(82.4%)、简单伤口修复(88.6%)和骨折复位(86.5%)时在场。受访者(51.6%)认为父母应该自行决定是否希望在场。父母在采血时焦虑程度最低,在 LP 时最紧张。

结论

大多数父母希望在 IP 期间陪伴在孩子身边。在我们的 PED,95%以上的 IP 有亲属在场。操作越具侵入性,父母的焦虑感越强。

相似文献

1
Parental presence during invasive procedures in a Spanish pediatric emergency department: incidence, perspectives, and related anxiety.家长在西班牙儿科急诊侵入性操作过程中的存在情况:发生率、观点和相关焦虑。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(4):202-7. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834490dc.
2
[Are parents present during invasive procedures? Assessment in 32 Spanish hospitals].[侵入性操作过程中家长会在场吗?对32家西班牙医院的评估]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2010 Apr;72(4):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2009.11.014. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
3
Family presence during invasive procedures at the emergency department: what is the opinion of Spanish medical staff?急诊科侵入性操作期间家属在场:西班牙医务人员持何种看法?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Feb;27(2):86-91. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182094329.
4
Parents and procedures: a randomized controlled trial.父母与程序:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 1996 Nov;98(5):861-7.
5
Parental presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation: attitudes of health care professionals in Turkey.侵入性操作和复苏过程中家长在场情况:土耳其医护人员的态度
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Apr;22(4):230-4. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000210178.86504.80.
6
Parental expectations of care and charges in a tertiary care pediatric ED.
Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Nov;20(7):601-3. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.35452.
7
[Presence of parents in the emergency room during invasive procedures: do they prefer to be present?].[侵入性操作期间家长在急诊室的情况:他们更愿意在场吗?]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2009 Mar;70(3):230-4. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2008.10.017. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
8
Parental presence during procedures in an emergency room: results from 50 observations.急诊室操作过程中家长在场情况:50例观察结果
Pediatrics. 1991 Apr;87(4):544-8.
9
Tracheal intubation practice and maintaining skill competency: survey of pediatric emergency department medical directors.气管插管操作与维持技能胜任力:儿科急诊科医疗主任调查
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 May;24(5):294-9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31816ecbd4.
10
Change in parental reasons for use of an urban pediatric emergency department in the past decade.过去十年间城市儿科急诊科家长就诊原因的变化。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Mar;26(3):181-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181d1dfc7.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Affecting Family Presence During Fracture Reduction in the Pediatric Emergency Department.影响儿科急诊骨折复位时家属在场的因素。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;19(6):970-976. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.9.38379. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
2
Family presence during resuscitation: A Canadian Critical Care Society position paper.复苏期间家属在场:加拿大重症监护学会立场文件。
Can Respir J. 2015 Jul-Aug;22(4):201-5. doi: 10.1155/2015/532721. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
3
Pediatric fractures through the eyes of parents: an observational study.
从家长视角看儿童骨折:一项观察性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jan;94(2):e407. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000407.
4
Parents' participation in taking care of hospitalized children: A concept analysis with hybrid model.父母参与照顾住院儿童:基于混合模型的概念分析
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014 Mar;19(2):139-44.
5
Families' stressors and needs at time of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation: a Jordanian perspective.心肺复苏时家庭的压力源与需求:约旦视角
Glob J Health Sci. 2013 Dec 1;6(2):72-85. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v6n2p72.
6
Family-centred care for hospitalised children aged 0-12 years.以家庭为中心的0至12岁住院儿童护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004811. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004811.pub3.