Suppr超能文献

两种预测困难插管方法的比较。

Comparison of two methods for predicting difficult intubation.

作者信息

Oates J D, Macleod A D, Oates P D, Pearsall F J, Howie J C, Murray G D

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics, Victoria Infirmary, Glasgow.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1991 Mar;66(3):305-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/66.3.305.

Abstract

Two methods of predicting difficult laryngoscopy were compared prospectively. Mallampati class and Wilson risk-sum were determined before operation and laryngeal view graded in 675 patients. Both tests identified five of 12 difficult laryngoscopies; twice as many patients were predicted to be difficult by Mallampati classification than by Wilson risk-sum. Inter-observer variation was minimal using Wilson risk-sum, but considerable for Mallampati classification. We prefer the Wilson risk-sum for assessment of the airway, while noting that both tests have poor sensitivities.

摘要

前瞻性地比较了两种预测困难喉镜检查的方法。在手术前确定Mallampati分级和Wilson风险总和,并对675例患者的喉镜视野进行分级。两种检查方法均在12例困难喉镜检查中识别出5例;Mallampati分级预测为困难的患者数量是Wilson风险总和预测的两倍。使用Wilson风险总和时观察者间差异最小,但Mallampati分级的差异相当大。我们更倾向于使用Wilson风险总和来评估气道,同时注意到两种检查的敏感性都较差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验