Bilgin H, Ozyurt G
Department of Anaesthesiology, Uludag University Medical School, Bursa, Turkey.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998 Aug;26(4):382-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9802600407.
Three methods of predicting difficult intubation were compared prospectively. Mallampati test, Wilson risk-sum and thyromental distance were determined preoperatively and laryngeal views were graded in 500 patients. The sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values of each test were calculated. The incidence of difficult intubation was found to be 8%. The sensitivities of the Mallampati test, the Wilson risk-sum and the thyromental distance were 43%, 58% and 35% respectively, and the specificities were 93%, 91% and 95% respectively. Significant differences were seen between the sensitivities of the Mallampati test and the Wilson risk-sum (P < 0.001), the Wilson risk-sum and the thyromental distance (P < 0.001), the Mallampati test and the thyromental distance (P < 0.05). Among the different specificities, the only significant difference was observed between the Wilson risk-sum and the thyromental distance (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the positive and negative predictive values of the three screening tests (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the Wilson risk-sum was the most sensitive test and the thyromental distance has the highest positive predictive value for difficult intubation.
前瞻性比较了三种预测困难插管的方法。术前测定500例患者的Mallampati试验、Wilson风险总和及颏甲距离,并对喉镜视野进行分级。计算每项检查的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。发现困难插管的发生率为8%。Mallampati试验、Wilson风险总和及颏甲距离的敏感性分别为43%、58%和35%,特异性分别为93%、91%和95%。Mallampati试验与Wilson风险总和的敏感性之间(P<0.001)、Wilson风险总和与颏甲距离的敏感性之间(P<0.001)、Mallampati试验与颏甲距离的敏感性之间(P<0.05)存在显著差异。在不同的特异性中,仅在Wilson风险总和与颏甲距离之间观察到显著差异(P<0.05)。三种筛查试验的阳性和阴性预测值之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。总之,Wilson风险总和是预测困难插管最敏感的检查,而颏甲距离对困难插管具有最高的阳性预测值。