Laboratoire de Neurobiologie de la Cognition, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Marseille, France.
Neuroimage. 2010 May 15;51(1):391-403. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
Falkenstein et al. (1991) first described a negative wave occurring just after an erroneous response in choice Reaction time tasks ("Error Negativity"-Ne or "Error Related Negativity"-ERN). Thanks to Laplacian transform of the data, Vidal et al. (2000, 2003a) described a wave on correct trials with similar topography and latency, although of smaller amplitude compared to the errors. A critical question is whether the Ne observed on errors and the negativity reported on correct trials reflect the same (modulated) activity, or whether they reflect completely different mechanisms. These two alternative possibilities were tested thanks to Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and source localization. ICA results showed that the waves recorded on errors and correct trials can be accounted for by the same independent component, corresponding to a dipolar source located within the Rostral Cingulate Zone. Source localization on the raw data also confirmed a common generator for correct and error trials. These data suggest that the waves on errors and correct trials reflect the same brain activity, whose amplitude varies as a function of the correctness of the response. The implications of this result for cognitive control are discussed.
法尔克斯坦等人(1991 年)首次描述了在选择反应时任务中,错误反应后立即出现的负向波(“错误负波”-Ne 或“错误相关负波”-ERN)。得益于数据的拉普拉斯变换,维达尔等人(2000 年,2003a)描述了在正确试验中具有相似拓扑和潜伏期的波,尽管与错误相比幅度较小。一个关键问题是,在错误中观察到的 Ne 和在正确试验中报告的负性是否反映了相同(调制)的活动,或者它们是否反映了完全不同的机制。这两种替代可能性通过独立成分分析(ICA)和源定位得到了检验。ICA 结果表明,错误和正确试验中记录的波可以由相同的独立成分来解释,该成分对应于位于额扣带区的偶极子源。原始数据上的源定位也证实了正确和错误试验的共同发生器。这些数据表明,错误和正确试验中的波反映了相同的大脑活动,其幅度随反应的正确性而变化。该结果对认知控制的影响进行了讨论。