Discipline of Public Health, Flinders University, Australia.
Prev Med. 2010 Apr;50(4):165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
To review published literature on the equity of participation in colorectal cancer screening amongst different population subgroups, in addition to identifying factors identified as barriers and facilitators to equitable screening. Studies were included in the review if they included FOBT as at least one of the screening tests.
Relevant published articles were identified through systematic electronic searches of selected databases and the examination of the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Studies of the association with colorectal cancer screening test participation, barriers to equitable participation in screening, and studies examining interventional actions to facilitate screening test participation were included. Data extraction and analysis was undertaken using an approach to the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies called Realist Review.
Sixty-three articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria. SES status, ethnicity, age and gender have been found as predictors of colorectal cancer screening test participation. This review also found that the potential for equitable cancer screening test participation may be hindered by access barriers which vary amongst population sub-groups.
This review provides evidence of horizontal inequity in colorectal cancer screening test participation, but limited understanding of the mechanism by which it is sustained, and few evidence-based solutions.
综述已发表的文献,探讨结直肠癌筛查在不同人群亚组中参与情况的公平性,同时确定影响公平筛查的障碍和促进因素。本研究纳入了至少使用粪便潜血试验(FOBT)作为筛查检测方法之一的研究。
通过对选定数据库进行系统的电子检索,并查阅检索到的文章的参考文献,确定了相关的已发表文章。本研究纳入了与结直肠癌筛查检测参与情况相关的研究、公平参与筛查的障碍研究,以及旨在促进筛查检测参与的干预措施研究。采用一种称为“现实主义综述”的方法进行数据提取和分析,综合定性和定量研究。
共确定了 63 篇符合纳入标准的文章。社会经济地位、种族、年龄和性别已被确定为结直肠癌筛查检测参与的预测因素。本综述还发现,不同人群亚组之间存在获得障碍,这可能会阻碍公平的癌症筛查检测参与。
本综述提供了结直肠癌筛查检测参与情况存在水平不公平的证据,但对其持续存在的机制以及基于证据的解决方案的理解有限。