• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宏观工效学与患者安全:对患者安全研究中理论、测量、分析和干预的层次影响。

Macroergonomics and patient safety: the impact of levels on theory, measurement, analysis and intervention in patient safety research.

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Room 3218, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2010 Sep;41(5):674-81. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.007. Epub 2010 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.007
PMID:20153456
Abstract

The study and practice of patient safety has seen a surge over the last 10 years. New resident training and staffing policies, health information technologies, error reporting systems, team models of care, training methods, patient involvement, information handoff strategies, just cultures, and many other interventions have been mandated or attempted to improve the safety of patient care. While some of these interventions focus on individual providers and others focus on organization-level changes, little, if any, patient safety research has purposefully sought to understand how variables at different levels, such as the provider level or organization level, interact to impact patient safety outcomes such as errors, adverse drug events, or patient harm. Looking at relationships across levels is important because adverse events might be related to variables at different levels; consider that adverse events may be nested within patients, patients nested within nurses and physicians, nurses and physicians nested within shifts, shifts nested within hospital units, and so forth. Because these nested levels exist, they may exert as yet untested influence on the levels below. In this paper the impact of levels on theory, measurement, analysis and intervention in patient safety research is discussed.

摘要

在过去的 10 年中,患者安全的研究和实践得到了迅猛发展。新的住院医师培训和人员配备政策、医疗信息技术、错误报告系统、护理团队模式、培训方法、患者参与、信息交接策略、公正文化以及许多其他干预措施已经被强制实施或尝试实施,以提高患者护理的安全性。虽然这些干预措施中的一些侧重于个体提供者,而另一些则侧重于组织层面的改变,但几乎没有任何患者安全研究有意试图了解提供者层面或组织层面等不同层面的变量如何相互作用,从而影响患者安全结果,如错误、药物不良事件或患者伤害。跨层次研究关系很重要,因为不良事件可能与不同层次的变量有关;例如,不良事件可能嵌套在患者中,患者嵌套在护士和医生中,护士和医生嵌套在班次中,班次嵌套在医院病房中,依此类推。由于存在这些嵌套层次,它们可能对下面的层次产生尚未经过测试的影响。本文讨论了患者安全研究中理论、测量、分析和干预的层次影响。

相似文献

1
Macroergonomics and patient safety: the impact of levels on theory, measurement, analysis and intervention in patient safety research.宏观工效学与患者安全:对患者安全研究中理论、测量、分析和干预的层次影响。
Appl Ergon. 2010 Sep;41(5):674-81. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.007. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
2
Improving safety for children with cardiac disease.提高患有心脏病儿童的安全性。
Cardiol Young. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 2:127-32. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001230.
3
Errors and the burden of errors: attitudes, perceptions, and the culture of safety in pediatric cardiac surgical teams.错误与错误负担:儿科心脏手术团队中的态度、认知及安全文化
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Apr;85(4):1374-81. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.024.
4
Patient safety event reporting in critical care: a study of three intensive care units.重症监护中的患者安全事件报告:对三个重症监护病房的研究
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1068-76. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259384.76515.83.
5
Detection of patient risk by nurses: a theoretical framework.护士对患者风险的检测:理论框架。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Feb;66(2):465-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05215.x.
6
Assessment of patient safety research from an organizational ergonomics and structural perspective.从组织工效学和结构视角评估患者安全研究。
Ergonomics. 2007 Sep;50(9):1451-84. doi: 10.1080/00140130701346765.
7
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科的事件报告。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001.
8
Electronic reporting to improve patient safety.电子报告以提高患者安全。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug;13(4):281-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.4.281.
9
The safety of hospital stroke care.医院中风护理的安全性。
Neurology. 2007 Feb 20;68(8):550-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000254992.39919.2e.
10
Status of quality initiatives, Part II.质量改进措施的现状,第二部分。
Mich Health Hosp. 2001 May-Jun;37(3):20-2.

引用本文的文献

1
A structural equation model for the patient safety competency of clinical nurses.临床护士患者安全胜任力的结构方程模型
PeerJ. 2024 Nov 26;12:e18462. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18462. eCollection 2024.
2
Human Factors Contributing to Infection Prevention in Outpatient Hemodialysis Centers: A Mixed Methods Study.人为因素对门诊血液透析中心感染预防的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Jul;84(1):18-27. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.12.024. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
3
Checklists to reduce diagnostic error: a systematic review of the literature using a human factors framework.
检查清单以减少诊断错误:使用人为因素框架对文献进行的系统回顾。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e058219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058219.
4
SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.SEIPS 3.0:以患者安全为中心的患者就医流程的人因工程设计。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
5
Toward a process-level view of distributed healthcare tasks: Medication management as a case study.迈向分布式医疗任务的流程级视图:以药物管理为例。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Nov;65:255-268. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
6
Occupational Macroergonomics: Principles, Scope, Value, and Methods.职业宏观工效学:原理、范围、价值与方法
IIE Trans Occup. 2015;3(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/21577323.2015.1027638. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
7
Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety.界定社会技术系统与安全有效科学所面临的方法挑战与机遇。
Ergonomics. 2015;58(4):565-99. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1015622. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
8
A systematic review of human factors and ergonomics (HFE)-based healthcare system redesign for quality of care and patient safety.基于人因工程学(HFE)的医疗系统重新设计以提高医疗质量和患者安全的系统评价。
Ergonomics. 2015;58(1):33-49. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.959070. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
9
Macroergonomics in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety.医疗质量与患者安全中的宏观工效学
Rev Hum Factors Ergon. 2013 Sep 1;8(1):4-54. doi: 10.1177/1557234X13492976.
10
SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients.SEIPS 2.0:一种用于研究和改善医疗保健专业人员和患者工作的人因学框架。
Ergonomics. 2013;56(11):1669-86. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.838643. Epub 2013 Oct 3.