• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从组织工效学和结构视角评估患者安全研究。

Assessment of patient safety research from an organizational ergonomics and structural perspective.

作者信息

Schutz A L, Counte M A, Meurer S

机构信息

Saint Louis University, School of Public Health, Salus Center, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2007 Sep;50(9):1451-84. doi: 10.1080/00140130701346765.

DOI:10.1080/00140130701346765
PMID:17654036
Abstract

The aim of this study is to review patient safety improvement initiatives within a conceptual framework that builds upon principles of organizational ergonomics and emphasizes structural factors that influence patient safety. The literature review included 131 English language published studies of patient safety improvement strategies extracted using Medline, Ovid Healthstar, PubMed and CINAHL searches. Keywords for the search included: 'patient safety'; 'medical errors'; 'adverse event'; 'iatrogenic'; and truncated options for 'improve'. The multilevel, hierarchical framework offered in this paper integrates quality management principles and organizational ergonomics theory and organizes patient safety initiatives according to sociotechnical system elements within three structural levels: health policies and associated health care organizations; health care delivery organizations; and health care microsystems. Utilizing the conceptual framework, this review of patient safety improvement initiatives highlights the need for consideration of the impact of all improvement proposals on each structural component within health care systems. The review also supports the need for patient safety research to evolve from exploratory, 1-D reporting to multi-level, integrated research.

摘要

本研究的目的是在一个基于组织工效学原理并强调影响患者安全的结构因素的概念框架内,回顾患者安全改进措施。文献综述纳入了131项以英文发表的关于患者安全改进策略的研究,这些研究是通过检索Medline、Ovid Healthstar、PubMed和CINAHL获取的。检索关键词包括:“患者安全”;“医疗差错”;“不良事件”;“医源性的”;以及“改进”的截断选项。本文提供的多层次、分层框架整合了质量管理原则和组织工效学理论,并根据社会技术系统要素在三个结构层面上对患者安全措施进行了组织:卫生政策及相关医疗保健组织;医疗保健服务组织;以及医疗保健微观系统。利用该概念框架,本次对患者安全改进措施的综述强调了需要考虑所有改进建议对医疗保健系统内每个结构组成部分的影响。该综述还支持患者安全研究需要从探索性的一维报告发展为多层次的综合研究。

相似文献

1
Assessment of patient safety research from an organizational ergonomics and structural perspective.从组织工效学和结构视角评估患者安全研究。
Ergonomics. 2007 Sep;50(9):1451-84. doi: 10.1080/00140130701346765.
2
Struggling to invent high-reliability organizations in health care settings: Insights from the field.在医疗环境中努力创建高可靠性组织:来自该领域的见解。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1618-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00568.x.
3
Macroergonomics and patient safety: the impact of levels on theory, measurement, analysis and intervention in patient safety research.宏观工效学与患者安全:对患者安全研究中理论、测量、分析和干预的层次影响。
Appl Ergon. 2010 Sep;41(5):674-81. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.007. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
4
Risk management systems for health care and safety development on transplantation: a review and a proposal.移植医疗保健与安全发展的风险管理系统:综述与建议
Transplant Proc. 2010 May;42(4):1014-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.03.100.
5
Continuing education meets the learning organization: the challenge of a systems approach to patient safety.继续教育与学习型组织:采用系统方法保障患者安全面临的挑战。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2000 Fall;20(4):197-207. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340200403.
6
Improving safety for children with cardiac disease.提高患有心脏病儿童的安全性。
Cardiol Young. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 2:127-32. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001230.
7
Incorporating organisational safety culture within ergonomics practice.将组织安全文化纳入人体工程学实践中。
Ergonomics. 2010 Oct;53(10):1167-74. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2010.512981.
8
Action to improve patient safety: "safety" prone health care systems.改善患者安全的行动:“安全至上”的医疗保健系统。
Ambul Outreach. 2000 Spring:6-13.
9
Dermatological patient safety: problems and solutions.皮肤科患者安全:问题与解决方案。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2010 Mar;21(2):86-92. doi: 10.3109/09546630903085310.
10
Knowledge management as a mediator for the efficacy of transformational leadership and quality management initiatives in U.S. health care.知识管理作为美国医疗保健领域变革型领导与质量管理举措成效的调解因素。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Apr-Jun;34(2):129-40. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31819e9169.

引用本文的文献

1
Security or Safety: Quantitative and Comparative Analysis of Usage in Research Works Published in 2004-2019.安全性:对2004年至2019年发表的研究著作中用法的定量与比较分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2019 Dec 9;9(12):146. doi: 10.3390/bs9120146.
2
On the integration and standardization of medication error data: taxonomies, terminologies, causes and contributing factors.关于用药错误数据的整合与标准化:分类法、术语、原因和促成因素。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2010 Dec;1(2):53-63. doi: 10.1177/2042098610389850.
3
SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients.
SEIPS 2.0:一种用于研究和改善医疗保健专业人员和患者工作的人因学框架。
Ergonomics. 2013;56(11):1669-86. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.838643. Epub 2013 Oct 3.