Suppr超能文献

疫苗专家评估中经济学使用的比较。

A comparison of the use of economics in vaccine expert reviews.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2010 Apr 1;28(16):2841-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.056. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

Abstract

We reviewed how health economics has been included in the vaccine expert review processes in a sample of countries. We identified two kinds of review processes - those in which vaccines and drugs are assessed using a common process, and those in which vaccines are assessed within the infectious disease framework. In either process, the countries recommend that their national pharmaco-economic (i.e., guidelines developed for drugs) guidelines be used to conduct the studies, although the guidelines themselves differ between countries. As a result of these factors, the decision process and the study outcomes can differ between countries, but because the vaccine adoption process includes other criteria as well, economic factors will not necessarily alter the outcome.

摘要

我们回顾了在一系列国家中,卫生经济学是如何被纳入疫苗专家审查流程的。我们发现了两种审查流程——一种是使用共同流程评估疫苗和药物,另一种是在传染病框架内评估疫苗。在任何一种流程中,这些国家都建议使用其国家药物经济学(即针对药物制定的指南)指南来进行研究,尽管这些指南在各国之间存在差异。由于这些因素,决策过程和研究结果可能在各国之间存在差异,但由于疫苗采用过程还包括其他标准,因此经济因素不一定会改变结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验