• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫苗专家评估中经济学使用的比较。

A comparison of the use of economics in vaccine expert reviews.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2010 Apr 1;28(16):2841-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.056. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.056
PMID:20153796
Abstract

We reviewed how health economics has been included in the vaccine expert review processes in a sample of countries. We identified two kinds of review processes - those in which vaccines and drugs are assessed using a common process, and those in which vaccines are assessed within the infectious disease framework. In either process, the countries recommend that their national pharmaco-economic (i.e., guidelines developed for drugs) guidelines be used to conduct the studies, although the guidelines themselves differ between countries. As a result of these factors, the decision process and the study outcomes can differ between countries, but because the vaccine adoption process includes other criteria as well, economic factors will not necessarily alter the outcome.

摘要

我们回顾了在一系列国家中,卫生经济学是如何被纳入疫苗专家审查流程的。我们发现了两种审查流程——一种是使用共同流程评估疫苗和药物,另一种是在传染病框架内评估疫苗。在任何一种流程中,这些国家都建议使用其国家药物经济学(即针对药物制定的指南)指南来进行研究,尽管这些指南在各国之间存在差异。由于这些因素,决策过程和研究结果可能在各国之间存在差异,但由于疫苗采用过程还包括其他标准,因此经济因素不一定会改变结果。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the use of economics in vaccine expert reviews.疫苗专家评估中经济学使用的比较。
Vaccine. 2010 Apr 1;28(16):2841-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.056. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
2
Are economic evaluations an important tool in vaccine policy decisions?经济评估在疫苗政策决策中是否是一个重要工具?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Oct;11(5):507-11. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.58.
3
Decision support in vaccination policies.疫苗接种政策中的决策支持。
Vaccine. 2009 Oct 9;27(43):5923-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.105. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
4
Health economic research on vaccinations and immunisation practices--an introductory primer.疫苗接种与免疫实践的卫生经济学研究——入门指南。
Vaccine. 2005 Mar 18;23(17-18):2095-103. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.064.
5
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
6
Emerging issues in vaccine economics: perspectives from the USA.疫苗经济学中的新问题:来自美国的观点
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2002 Dec;1(4):433-42. doi: 10.1586/14760584.1.4.433.
7
Evidence for moxifloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: the impact of pharmaco-economic considerations on guidelines.莫西沙星用于社区获得性肺炎的证据:药物经济学考量对指南的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Oct;25(10):2447-57. doi: 10.1185/03007990903223663.
8
[Pharmaco-economic evaluations of new drugs: potential key to a more efficient allocation of the health care budget].[新药的药物经济学评估:实现医疗保健预算更有效分配的潜在关键]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 Jun 8;146(23):1068-71.
9
Do we fully understand the economic value of vaccines?我们是否完全理解疫苗的经济价值?
Vaccine. 2007 Aug 10;25(32):5945-57. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.04.070. Epub 2007 May 15.
10
Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.质量调整生命年在儿科护理中缺乏质量:对已发表的儿童健康成本效用研究的批判性综述。
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):e600-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2127.

引用本文的文献

1
National decision-making for the introduction of new vaccines: A systematic review, 2010-2020.国家决策引进新疫苗:系统评价,2010-2020 年。
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 1;39(14):1897-1909. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.059. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
2
Risk in vaccine research and development quantified.疫苗研发风险量化。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057755. Epub 2013 Mar 20.