• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种自酸蚀、自粘接树脂水门汀的吸水和溶解度。

Water sorption and solubility of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin luting agents.

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials, Section of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2010 Feb;12(1):39-43. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a17539.

DOI:10.3290/j.jad.a17539
PMID:20155229
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the water sorption and water solubility of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin luting agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four self-etching, self-adhesive resin luting agents (RelyX Unicem, Maxcem, Biscem, Multilink Sprint) and one classic resin luting agent (Multilink Automix) as a control group were used. Twelve disks (8 mm x 1 mm) of each material were prepared according to ISO 4049. Water sorption and solubility were calculated, using the formulae which the ISO 4049 specification provides.

RESULTS

Maxcem and Biscem were found to have very high water sorption values. RelyX Unicem and Multilink Sprint exhibited water sorption values only slightly higher than the control group. Regarding water solubility, the greater mass loss was found for Maxcem. Multilink Sprint exhibited no mass change. Biscem was found to have low solubility values, whereas RelyX Unicem and Multilink Automix exhibited negative solubility.

CONCLUSION

Multilink Sprint and RelyX Unicem were found to comply with the ISO requirements regarding water sorption and solubility, while Maxcem and Biscem did not. Materials of the same group exhibited very different behavior during their interaction with water.

摘要

目的

评估和比较 4 种自酸蚀、自粘接树脂水门汀的吸水和水溶性能。

材料和方法

使用 4 种自酸蚀、自粘接树脂水门汀(RelyX Unicem、Maxcem、Biscem、Multilink Sprint)和 1 种经典树脂水门汀(Multilink Automix)作为对照组。根据 ISO 4049 标准制备每种材料的 12 个圆盘(8mm×1mm)。采用 ISO 4049 规范提供的公式计算吸水率和溶解度。

结果

Maxcem 和 Biscem 的吸水率非常高。RelyX Unicem 和 Multilink Sprint 的吸水率仅略高于对照组。就溶解度而言,Maxcem 的质量损失最大。Multilink Sprint 没有质量变化。Biscem 的溶解度值较低,而 RelyX Unicem 和 Multilink Automix 的溶解度值为负值。

结论

Multilink Sprint 和 RelyX Unicem 的吸水率和溶解度符合 ISO 要求,而 Maxcem 和 Biscem 不符合。同一组的材料在与水相互作用时表现出非常不同的行为。

相似文献

1
Water sorption and solubility of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin luting agents.四种自酸蚀、自粘接树脂水门汀的吸水和溶解度。
J Adhes Dent. 2010 Feb;12(1):39-43. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a17539.
2
Water sorption and water solubility of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements.自酸蚀和自粘接树脂水门汀的吸水性和水溶性
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Nov;114(5):674-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
3
Effect of conditioner on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin.调节剂对自粘接树脂水门汀与牙本质微拉伸粘接强度的影响。
Stomatologija. 2010;12(3):73-9.
4
Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials.不同聚合粘结材料的吸水和溶解行为评估
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;13(17):2851. doi: 10.3390/polym13172851.
5
Curing efficiency of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements.四种自酸蚀、自黏结树脂水门汀的固化效率
Dent Mater. 2009 Sep;25(9):1104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.015. Epub 2009 May 8.
6
Regional bond strength to lateral walls in class I and II ceramic inlays luted with four resin cements and glass-ionomer luting agent.四类树脂水门汀和玻璃离子水门汀黏固体对Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类嵌体侧方粘结强度的影响
J Adhes Dent. 2011 Oct;13(5):455-65. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19816.
7
Evaluation of ISO 4049: water sorption and water solubility of resin cements.ISO 4049评估:树脂水门汀的吸水性和水溶性
Eur J Oral Sci. 2017 Apr;125(2):141-150. doi: 10.1111/eos.12339. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
8
Microleakage of all-ceramic crowns using self-etching resin luting agents.使用自酸蚀树脂粘结剂的全瓷冠微渗漏
Oper Dent. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(4):392-9. doi: 10.2341/07-101.
9
Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.IPS empress 2 嵌体修复体用自粘接树脂水门汀黏固后的微渗漏。
Oper Dent. 2012 Jul-Aug;37(4):417-24. doi: 10.2341/10-337-L. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
10
Influence of different luting concepts on long term retentive strength of zirconia crowns.不同粘结概念对氧化锆全冠长期固位强度的影响。
Am J Dent. 2009 Apr;22(2):122-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of bond strength of self-adhesive and self-etch or total-etch resin cement to zirconia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.自粘性、自酸蚀或全酸蚀树脂水门汀与氧化锆粘结强度的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Feb;27(2):113-125. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_225_23. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
2
Physical, Mechanical, and Adhesive Properties of Novel Self-Adhesive Resin Cement.新型自粘树脂水门汀的物理、机械和粘结性能
Int J Dent. 2022 Apr 8;2022:4475394. doi: 10.1155/2022/4475394. eCollection 2022.
3
Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials.
不同聚合粘结材料的吸水和溶解行为评估
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;13(17):2851. doi: 10.3390/polym13172851.
4
Effect of Two Immediate Dentin Sealing Approaches on Bond Strength of Lava™ CAD/CAM Indirect Restoration.两种即时牙本质封闭方法对Lava™ CAD/CAM间接修复体粘结强度的影响
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 26;14(7):1629. doi: 10.3390/ma14071629.
5
The effects of different surface treatments on the shear bond strengths of two dual-cure resin cements to CAD/CAM restorative materials.不同表面处理对两种双固化树脂水门汀与CAD/CAM修复材料之间剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Aug;12(4):189-196. doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.4.189. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
6
Cytotoxicity of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements on Human Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts.自粘接树脂水门汀对人牙周膜成纤维细胞的细胞毒性。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Nov 29;2018:7823467. doi: 10.1155/2018/7823467. eCollection 2018.
7
Self-adhesive resin cements: pH-neutralization, hydrophilicity, and hygroscopic expansion stress.自粘结树脂水门汀:中和 pH 值、亲水性和吸湿性膨胀压。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1735-1741. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1947-4. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
8
The Comparison of Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Four Different Resin Luting Cements in Different Storage Media.四种不同树脂粘结水门汀在不同储存介质中的吸附与溶解行为比较
J Dent (Shiraz). 2016 Jun;17(2):91-7.
9
Effects of coronal substrates and water storage on the microhardness of a resin cement used for luting ceramic crowns.牙冠基底和储水对用于粘结陶瓷冠的树脂水门汀显微硬度的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jul-Aug;22(4):287-93. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130455.
10
Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.一种用于陶瓷嵌体的自粘接水门汀的四年临床评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):739-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0762-9. Epub 2012 Jun 17.