Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-facial Surgery, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):739-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0762-9. Epub 2012 Jun 17.
The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the 4-year clinical performance of a self-adhesive resin cement, RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE), used for cementation of ceramic inlays. In addition, the influence of selectively acid-etching enamel prior to luting on the clinical performance of the restorations was assessed.
Sixty-two IPS Empress 2 inlays/onlays were placed in 31 patients by two experienced clinicians. The restorations were luted with RelyX Unicem with (=experimental group: E) or without (=control group: NE) prior enamel etching with phosphoric acid. At baseline, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 4 years after placement, the restorations were assessed by two calibrated investigators using modified USPHS criteria. Ten selected samples of each group were investigated under SEM regarding morphological changes at the cement-inlay interface.
The recall rate at 4 years was 97%. Two restorations (1 E, 1 NE) were lost, and one (E) had to be replaced due to inlay and tooth fracture resulting in a survival rate of 95%. No significant differences between the experimental and control group were noticed regarding all criteria (McNemar, p < 0.05). An obvious deterioration in marginal integrity was observed after 4 years as only 5% (E = 7%; NE = 3%) of the restorations exhibited an excellent marginal adaptation. In 90% of the restorations small, still clinically acceptable marginal deficiencies were observed. SEM of the luting gap showed an increased wear of the RelyX Unicem cement over the 4-year period.
The self-adhesive luting cement RelyX Unicem can be recommended for bonding of ceramic inlays/onlays. Additional selective enamel etching does not improve the clinical performance of the restorations within the 4-year period.
The self-adhesive resin composite RelyX Unicem showed acceptable clinical performance after 4 years of clinical service.
本随机对照临床试验的目的是评估自粘结树脂水门汀 RelyX Unicem(3M ESPE)用于粘结陶瓷嵌体 4 年的临床性能。此外,评估在粘固前选择性酸蚀釉质对修复体临床性能的影响。
由两名有经验的临床医生将 62 个 IPS Empress 2 嵌体/高嵌体放置在 31 名患者中。修复体分别用 RelyX Unicem(有=实验组:E;无=对照组:NE)粘结,粘结前釉质用磷酸酸蚀。在基线、6 个月、1 年、2 年和 4 年后,由两名经过校准的研究者使用改良 USPHS 标准对修复体进行评估。每组各取 10 个样本,用 SEM 观察粘结剂-嵌体界面的形态变化。
4 年后的召回率为 97%。有 2 个修复体(1 个 E,1 个 NE)脱落,1 个(E)因嵌体和牙体折裂而更换,存活率为 95%。实验组和对照组在所有标准方面均无显著差异(McNemar,p<0.05)。4 年后,边缘完整性明显恶化,只有 5%(E=7%;NE=3%)的修复体具有良好的边缘适应性。90%的修复体存在微小但仍可接受的边缘缺陷。粘结间隙的 SEM 显示,在 4 年的时间里,RelyX Unicem 粘结剂的磨损增加。
自粘结水门汀 RelyX Unicem 可推荐用于粘结陶瓷嵌体/高嵌体。在 4 年的临床应用中,选择性釉质酸蚀并不能改善修复体的临床性能。
自粘结树脂复合材料 RelyX Unicem 在 4 年的临床应用后表现出可接受的临床性能。