• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

夫妻之间同理心的测量:夫妻人际反应指数的效度和信度。

Measuring empathy in couples: validity and reliability of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for couples.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2010 Mar;92(2):146-57. doi: 10.1080/00223890903510399.

DOI:10.1080/00223890903510399
PMID:20155564
Abstract

This article includes three studies aimed at adapting the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis, 1980), a measure of general cognitive and emotional empathy, to assess empathy expressed within a romantic relationship. We examined the factorial structure of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Couples (IRIC). Results supported the use of the 2-factor measure (Dyadic Perspective Taking and Dyadic Empathic Concern) in 3 independent samples (individuals in heterosexual relationships, individuals in same-sex relationships, and partners of heterosexual couples). The IRIC also demonstrated good convergent, discriminant, concurrent, predictive, and incremental validity as well as adequate internal consistency and stability over 18 months.

摘要

这篇文章包含了三项研究,旨在改编人际反应指数(Davis,1980),这是一种衡量一般认知和情感同理心的方法,以评估浪漫关系中表达的同理心。我们研究了人际反应指数在夫妻关系中的因子结构(IRIC)。结果支持在 3 个独立样本(异性恋关系中的个体、同性恋关系中的个体和异性恋伴侣的伴侣)中使用 2 因素测量方法(对偶视角和对偶共情关注)。IRIC 还表现出良好的聚合、区分、并发、预测和增量有效性,以及在 18 个月内足够的内部一致性和稳定性。

相似文献

1
Measuring empathy in couples: validity and reliability of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for couples.夫妻之间同理心的测量:夫妻人际反应指数的效度和信度。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Mar;92(2):146-57. doi: 10.1080/00223890903510399.
2
Measuring offence-specific forgiveness in marriage: the Marital Offence-Specific Forgiveness Scale (MOFS).测量婚姻中针对特定冒犯行为的宽恕:婚姻特定冒犯行为宽恕量表(MOFS)。
Psychol Assess. 2009 Jun;21(2):194-209. doi: 10.1037/a0016068.
3
Dyadic coping in Latino couples: validity of the Spanish version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory.拉丁裔夫妇的对偶应对:对偶应对量表西班牙语版的有效性。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2013;26(4):447-66. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2012.699045. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
4
Three-year follow-up of same-sex couples who had civil unions in Vermont, same-sex couples not in civil unions, and heterosexual married couples.对在佛蒙特州缔结民事结合的同性伴侣、未缔结民事结合的同性伴侣以及异性已婚伴侣进行的三年随访。
Dev Psychol. 2008 Jan;44(1):102-16. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.102.
5
Dyadic empathy in Polish samples: validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Couples.波兰样本中的二元共情:夫妻人际反应指数的验证
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2021 Feb 12;9(4):354-365. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2021.103541. eCollection 2021.
6
Assessing how much couples work at their relationship: the behavioral self-regulation for effective relationships scale.评估夫妻在维持关系方面付出的努力程度:有效关系的行为自我调节量表。
J Fam Psychol. 2005 Sep;19(3):385-93. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.3.385.
7
Relational factors in understanding satisfaction in the lasting relationships of same sex and heterosexual couples.理解同性伴侣和异性伴侣持久关系中满意度的相关因素。
J Homosex. 2004;47(1):111-36. doi: 10.1300/J082v47n01_07.
8
The assessment of empathy in adolescence: A contribution to the Italian validation of the "Basic Empathy Scale".青少年共情能力评估:对《基本共情量表》意大利语版效度验证的一项贡献
J Adolesc. 2009 Apr;32(2):393-408. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
9
The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior.童年中期共情的结构及其与亲社会行为的关系。
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1997 Aug;123(3):303-24.
10
Construct validity of the Perceived Criticism Measure.感知批评量表的结构效度。
Behav Ther. 2009 Jun;40(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Dispositional and communicated dyadic perspective-taking during conflicts and intimate partner violence perpetration in young adult couples.青年夫妻在冲突和亲密伴侣暴力行为中的性格和交流性二元观点采择
J Soc Pers Relat. 2025 Jun 4;42(10):2729-2752. doi: 10.1177/02654075251349349. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Measuring cognitive and affective empathy across positive and negative emotions: psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Perth Empathy Scale.测量积极和消极情绪下的认知共情和情感共情:珀斯共情量表的心理测量特性和测量不变性
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 11;16:1533611. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1533611. eCollection 2025.
3
Genetic variations as predictors of dispositional and dyadic empathy-a couple study.
遗传变异作为个体和对偶同理心的预测指标:一项夫妻研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 9;14(1):27411. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78857-7.
4
Psychometric properties of the SocioEmotional Skills Instrument for Teachers using network approach: English and Spanish version.运用网络方法的教师社会情感技能量表的心理测量特性:英语和西班牙语版本
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 20;15:1421164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1421164. eCollection 2024.
5
Synchrony within, synchrony without: establishing the link between interpersonal behavioural and brain-to-brain synchrony during role-play.内部同步,外部同步:在角色扮演过程中建立人际行为与脑对脑同步之间的联系。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Sep 24;11(9):240331. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240331. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Exploring Compersion: A Study on Polish Consensually Non-Monogamous Individuals and Adaptation of the COMPERSe Questionnaire.探索共情:对波兰自愿非一夫一妻制个体的研究及 COMPERSe 问卷的改编。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Aug;53(8):3285-3307. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02930-5. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
7
Culture, sex and social context influence brain-to-brain synchrony: an fNIRS hyperscanning study.文化、性别和社会背景影响大脑间同步:一项功能近红外光谱学超扫描研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Jun 14;12(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01841-3.
8
Empathy and support exchanges in couples coping with early-stage Alzheimer's disease.夫妻应对早发性老年痴呆症过程中的同理心和支持交流。
Aging Ment Health. 2024 Jul;28(7):995-1002. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2326958. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
9
Dyadic empathy in Polish samples: validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Couples.波兰样本中的二元共情:夫妻人际反应指数的验证
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2021 Feb 12;9(4):354-365. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2021.103541. eCollection 2021.
10
Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses.在 32 门大学课程中对会话式人工智能的感知、性能和可检测性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 24;13(1):12187. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38964-3.