Sessink Paul J M, Connor Thomas H, Jorgenson James A, Tyler Timothy G
Exposure Control BV, Wijchen, The Netherlands.
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2011 Mar;17(1):39-48. doi: 10.1177/1078155210361431. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
Surface contamination with the antineoplastic drugs cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and 5-fluorouracil was compared in 22 US hospital pharmacies following preparation with standard drug preparation techniques or the PhaSeal® closed-system drug transfer device (CSTD).
Wipe samples were taken from biological safety cabinet (BSC) surfaces, BSC airfoils, floors in front of BSCs, and counters and analyzed for contamination with cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and 5-fluorouracil. Contamination was reassessed several months after the implementation of the CSTD. Surface contamination (ng/cm(2)) was compared between the two techniques and evaluated with the Signed Rank Test.
Using the CSTD compared to the standard preparation techniques, a significant reduction in levels of contamination was observed for all drugs (cyclophosphamide: p < 0.0001; ifosfamide: p < 0.001; 5-fluorouracil: p < 0.01). Median values for surface contamination with cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and 5-fluorouracil were reduced by 95%, 90%, and 65%, respectively.
Use of the CSTD significantly reduces surface contamination when preparing cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and 5-fluorouracil as compared to standard drug preparation techniques.
采用标准药物配制技术或PhaSeal®封闭系统药物转移装置(CSTD)配制后,比较美国22家医院药房中抗肿瘤药物环磷酰胺、异环磷酰胺和5-氟尿嘧啶的表面污染情况。
从生物安全柜(BSC)表面、BSC机翼、BSC前方地板以及柜台采集擦拭样本,分析其中环磷酰胺、异环磷酰胺和5-氟尿嘧啶的污染情况。在实施CSTD几个月后重新评估污染情况。采用符号秩检验比较两种技术之间的表面污染(ng/cm²)情况并进行评估。
与标准配制技术相比,使用CSTD时,所有药物的污染水平均显著降低(环磷酰胺:p < 0.0001;异环磷酰胺:p < 0.001;5-氟尿嘧啶:p < 0.01)。环磷酰胺、异环磷酰胺和5-氟尿嘧啶的表面污染中位数分别降低了95%、90%和65%。
与标准药物配制技术相比,使用CSTD在配制环磷酰胺、异环磷酰胺和5-氟尿嘧啶时可显著降低表面污染。