Suppr超能文献

使用社区样本测试外部和内部线索对吸烟动机的影响。

Testing the influence of external and internal cues on smoking motivation using a community sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, and H. Lee Moffitt Center & Research Institute, 4115 E. Fowler Ave., Tampa, FL 33617, USA.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Feb;18(1):61-70. doi: 10.1037/a0017414.

Abstract

Exposing smokers to either external cues (e.g., pictures of cigarettes) or internal cues (e.g., negative affect induction) can induce urge to smoke and other behavioral and physiological responses. However, little is known about whether the two types of cues interact when presented in close proximity, as is likely the case in the real word. Additionally, potential moderators of cue reactivity have rarely been examined. Finally, few cue-reactivity studies have used representative samples of smokers. In a randomized 2 x 2 crossed factorial between-subjects design, the current study tested the effects of a negative affect cue intended to produce anxiety (speech preparation task) and an external smoking cue on urge and behavioral reactivity in a community sample of adult smokers (N = 175), and whether trait impulsivity moderated the effects. Both types of cues produced main effects on urges to smoke, despite the speech task failing to increase anxiety significantly. The speech task increased smoking urge related to anticipation of negative affect relief, whereas the external smoking cues increased urges related to anticipation of pleasure; however, the cues did not interact. Impulsivity measures predicted urge and other smoking-related variables, but did not moderate cue-reactivity. Results suggest independent rather than synergistic effects of these contributors to smoking motivation.

摘要

暴露于外部线索(例如香烟图片)或内部线索(例如负面情绪诱导)的吸烟者可能会引起吸烟的冲动以及其他行为和生理反应。然而,目前还不清楚当两种类型的线索近距离呈现时是否会相互作用,因为这在现实世界中很可能是常见的情况。此外,线索反应的潜在调节因素很少被研究过。最后,很少有关于线索反应的研究使用吸烟者的代表性样本。在一项随机的 2x2 交叉被试间因子设计中,本研究测试了一种旨在产生焦虑的负面情绪线索(演讲准备任务)和一种外部吸烟线索对社区成年吸烟者(N=175)的吸烟冲动和行为反应的影响,以及特质冲动性是否调节了这些影响。尽管演讲任务并未显著增加焦虑,但两种类型的线索都对吸烟冲动产生了主要影响。演讲任务增加了与预期负面情绪缓解相关的吸烟冲动,而外部吸烟线索则增加了与预期愉悦相关的吸烟冲动;但是,线索之间没有相互作用。冲动性测量预测了吸烟冲动和其他与吸烟相关的变量,但没有调节线索反应性。结果表明,这些导致吸烟动机的因素的作用是独立的,而不是协同的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验