Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2010 May;40(5):405-21. doi: 10.3109/10408441003610571.
As long as no effective malaria vaccine is available, chemotherapy belongs to the most important weapons fighting malaria. One of the most promising new drug developments is the sesquiterpene artemisinin (ARS) and its derivatives, e.g., artemether, arteether, and sodium artesunate. Large clinical studies and meta-analyses did not show serious side effects, although proper monitoring of adverse effects in developing countries might not be a trivial task. There is a paucity of large-scale clinical trials suitable to detect rare but significant toxicity. Therefore, a final and definitive statement on the safety of artemisinins still cannot be made. In contrast, animal experiments show considerable toxicity upon application of artemisinins. In the present review, the authors give a comprehensive overview on toxicity studies in cell culture and in animals (mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, monkeys) as well as on toxicity reported in human clinical trials. The authors emphasize the current knowledge on neurotoxicity, embryotoxicity, genotoxicity, hemato- and immunotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and allergic reactions. The lesson learned from animal and human studies is that long-term availability rather than short-term peak concentrations of artemisinins cause toxicity. Rapid elimination of artemisinins after oral intake represents a relatively safe route of administration compared to delayed drug release after intramuscular (i.m.) injection. This explains why considerable toxicities were found in the majority of animal experiments, but not in human studies. In addition, there are drug-related differences, i.e., intramuscular application of artemether or arteether, but not to artesunate, which is safe and gives good profiles after i.m. administration in severe malaria. Although there is no need to increase doses of artemisinins for uncomplicated malaria, this has to be taken into account for cerebellar involvement in severe malaria. It might also be important in determining dose limitations for treatment of other diseases such as cancer.
只要没有有效的疟疾疫苗,化疗仍然是对抗疟疾的最重要武器之一。最有前途的新药开发之一是倍半萜青蒿素(ARS)及其衍生物,例如青蒿琥酯、蒿甲醚和青蒿琥酯钠。虽然在发展中国家适当监测不良反应可能不是一项简单的任务,但大型临床研究和荟萃分析并未显示出严重的副作用。缺乏适合检测罕见但严重毒性的大规模临床试验。因此,关于青蒿素的安全性仍然不能做出最终和明确的结论。相比之下,动物实验显示青蒿素应用时有相当大的毒性。在本综述中,作者全面概述了细胞培养和动物(小鼠、大鼠、兔子、狗、猴子)中的毒性研究以及人类临床试验中报告的毒性。作者强调了目前关于神经毒性、胚胎毒性、遗传毒性、血液和免疫毒性、心脏毒性、肾毒性和过敏反应的知识。从动物和人体研究中得到的教训是,青蒿素的长期可用性而不是短期的峰值浓度会导致毒性。与肌肉注射(i.m.)后延迟药物释放相比,口服摄入后青蒿素的快速消除代表了一种相对安全的给药途径。这解释了为什么在大多数动物实验中发现了相当大的毒性,但在人体研究中没有发现。此外,还存在与药物相关的差异,即肌肉注射青蒿琥酯或蒿甲醚,但不是青蒿琥酯,青蒿琥酯在严重疟疾中肌肉注射后安全且具有良好的曲线。虽然在治疗无并发症疟疾时不需要增加青蒿素的剂量,但在治疗严重疟疾时需要考虑小脑受累的情况。在确定治疗其他疾病(如癌症)的剂量限制时,这也可能很重要。